-->
@Elminster
or if it even is used correctly
I'm beating a dead horseThe trade is2 shots vs 1But implies second shot has to be accurate if we miss 1---------------1 shot but with the option of 2nps of results to analyzeI prefer the latter.
Policy lynching millers was not created by Pie. I'm sure if you look at any other person they'd policy lynch millers too. You are just the first person on DART who uses the meta, you didn't invent it.
I like that pie is buddying drafter but I'm getting scum read because they think I'm buddying Elm. Racists
WoofI'm just gonna do the math out loud to orient my thoughts. 9 peeps here so assuming it's 6 v 3, that's a 33% chance to catch scum. VTNL twice, two scum kills, we get to 4 v 3, that's a 43% chance to get them, but really it's higher than that b/c of investigative results. So I'm not understanding your argument that it benefits mafia to VTNL?
Also gonna pull a mikal read with Pie and say that he's been on Discord a lot more on his phone. He only hops on Discord when pinged. Not gonna read anymore into that but it's just a note
Because you didn't invent it :)
The interaction part is where I see the most red flags. Why is Pie pointing out something drafterman said a year ago and looking at him to test his reaction? How does he know what drafterman is thinking at the time this is going. What would be the motive for Pie to focus in on something from a year ago just to ask for Drafter's opinion on something. To me, it doesn't add up in anyway. The only reason that post would've been brought up if drafter told Pie about the post, which leads me to believe they have some form of communication with each other. Drafter even says it wasn't recently where he said Miller claims. Why would Pie remember this info at all? These don't add in anywayIt doesn't add up if you posit us both as scum, either. Does it make sense that a scum-pair would do that?
Tunneling on one person when there's no concrete evidence of whether or not he's scum is extremely rash and reactionary versus him last game, where while he voted Water, he was much more cautious of his vote versus now, where he is voting Elm off of less information. Water had bad plays and sus moves constantly, and it didn't take Drafter til page 6 to vote him, where he didn't even go through with the vote because of Elm. This tunneling where he disregards the case on Pie and only focuses on one character is anti town, and anti town is usually scum. I maintained the position that bad town and anti town are different in various definitions and regards. The fact he is willing to throw Pie in the pile after he did not claim Dp1 in the time he had. He isn't considering any options, versus town drafter, where in the last game, he considered Elm an option as well. Why isn't he doing the same hereIt's not anti-town to tunnel on scum and get scum lynched.
I've made a big case about this but drafter left the site in March this year. He then states his belief of Millers are confirmed town because of the site and shouldn't be trusted. Yet when he left the site and came back, he is now suddenly changing his opinion on claimed Millers, even when they don't claim right away?YOU said many things change in a year. Now you're saying things can't change in a year. (Also you said things may or may not change in a year). Which is it. Can you preface each post with the specific mutually exclusive position you're artbirarily picking for that point in time? It'll make things easier.
What changed about his behavior since? He didn't participate in any mafia games during this time? He rage quit another mafia game,No I didn't.
why is he suddenly having this drastic change of heart? To me, his reads are not consistent of his play. Drafter is not someone to change based on a meta or belief or wave, yet he decides to drastically change the style he preached. It's out of character, and would coorelate with drafter forcing a potential mislynch on Elm and then when it's MYLO, he goes an attacks me for being aggressive and gets enough of town validation to get a mislynch since it is the funny trend to hate on Supa and just push the narrative that Supa is an idiot and should be lynched cuz idiots are scummy.The funny thing is all of this is based ONLY on stuff I've told you about myself. You haven't done any of your own thinking on the subject, it's based on what I've told you, here in this game, about my own past behavior. You haven't independently verified any off it.
All the more amusing because - as I said - the behavior you are alleging I've changed from IS FROM WHEN I WAS SCUM. So you're entire argument is:"Drafter is scum now because he has drastically changed from his behavior when he was scum in a game a year ago. I know this because he told me this now and I trust what he is telling me now even though I think he's scum."
Also gonna pull a mikal read with Pie and say that he's been on Discord a lot more on his phone. He only hops on Discord when pinged. Not gonna read anymore into that but it's just a note
You go on Discord when you are pinged for something on phone. I noticed this morning and yesterday you were on phone when I didn't ping. Like I said, it's only a note and not a read, but a little thought