Well, let's recall QAnon is supposed to be a single individual working for the Dept. of Energy with a Q clearance. One would assume that individual would represent core Q and 8kun certainly represented itself as the portal for that individual 2019-20. Now that that claim is debunked, I'm not sure what would represent core QAnon (or even how a religion persists after their prophet has been exposed as a fraud). I have read that the most popular QAnon site this summer is QSear.ch, and as the .ch domain demonstrates that site is being run by China. I think the 8kun server is in a backyard shed in Portland now but the site security is being run by the Russian military out of St. Petersburg. There's little to suggest that any core American interest is generating content now.
How many people have you actually had conversations with who claim to be part of Q ? That's all I'm saying.
I wouldn't trust a Muslim to describe all Christians, and in the same way I wouldn't trust a Christian to describe all Muslims.
The "story" you've been fed about the origin and existence (and demise) of Q is not the same story you get from individuals who self-identify as Q.
Agreed. But that very fact invalidates QAnon’s credibility. The whole point of the religion was that there was a high ranking official within the dept of energy who was leaking information that nobody else in the Trump administration dare say. Since that story is discredited, QAnon itself is discredited and all the false assertions based on that source discredited.
To use your analogy, if we later discovered that the man who died on the cross was Jesus’s twin brother, Christ and his assertions would stand generally discredited. Sure James and Peter might try to change the story and claim that they self-identify as Christ now but why should anybody give a shit?
The story we’ve been fed about the origin and existence of Q came from Q. I guess conspiracy theorists can go back to making up their own lies but it is important that we that we keep exposing them as corrupt liars, right?
I think I would trust a Muslim to define Christianity more than I would a Baptist or catholic- more objective, no specific dogma to defend. Likewise, I would trust a Christian to describe Islam better than a Sunni or a Shi’a