-->
@Castin
I am not someone who believes in scripture.
Well this is where many here misunderstand me, and do so purposely and out of sheer bloody-mindedness for argument,sake. I do believe these scriptures I just do not accept them in the state that they have come down to us. I am not religious but believe that Jesus existed. I also believe that he would have been appalled that a whole new religious ideology had sprang up in his name. I believe that he was king come to regain a throne that he (as did others) believed was rightfully his.
The Christian invention of literal "miracles" that Jesus was said to have performed can all be explained. Water into wine for instance was an initiation ceremony. Think ` silk purse from a sows ear` in todays language.
Seriously, ask yourself, what kind of god would waste his maiden "miracle" on making sure the " wedding" guests got drunk? Who was Jesus and his mother to all of a sudden take over catering arrangements at a "wedding" that wasn't even his own(?) and when there was a perfectly good and capable steward(master of ceremonies) on hand to send out for more refreshments? No this was no miracle. It was an initiation ceremony en masse. As was the feeding of the 4-5 thousand.
If this was indeed miracle ,why would Jesus rebuke his mother and tell her "his time had not yet come" but then perform it anyway? Why didn't the steward or anyone else even comment on this "miracle " .
Why cure just a few leapers when this god man could have eradicated all of leprosy from the face of the earth? Because this too was an initiation to a higher degree in the Jesus movement. As was making the "blind" see.
I ask questions that Christians don`t , won't or cannot think to ask for themselves and questions that they certainly don`t like to be confronted with.
John the baptist: "the greatest prophet that ever lived" according to Jesus himself and the forerunner paving the way for Jesus, for reasons known only to himself suddenly believed that Jesus was supposed to be baptising him!?? - after all those years apparently doing nothing but preaching about "the one to come" And when that little bit of confusion was sorted and after John heard the voice of god himself saying this "is my son", John is arrested and has serious doubt as to who Jesus is and sends his own disciples to ask Jesus if he was the one prophesised about! "Are you the one to come after me or shall we wait for another?" seriously !!! didn't he know?? If John the greatest prophet that ever lived had his doubts, then what chance did Jew public and the lost sheep of Israel have of believing it?
Why didn't Jesus raise John "the greatest prophet" from the dead as he did his mere friend Lazarus? Why didn't Jesus shed a single tear on hearing about John's death as he did for his friend Lazarus?
If my probing questions, my criticizing and scrutinizing of these scriptures happen to offend or upset Christians , I am not sorry. They should be able to defend them with proof and logic and not by inserting words into the text that are not there and by putting words into the mouths of the biblical authors and characters in poor attempts to explain away these biblical anomalies.
Christian always turn nasty and show their true colours when confronted with these types of questions.
I can also see that Christians view Jesus's sacrifice as a miracle
And I see how they have been lied to and have been lying to themselves for millennia.
I have found that the OT is more truthful and honest than the New. I take the Old Testament as an history of one single bloodline.. When it is scrutinized we can see that this "Lord" had only the interests and concerns of one single family and one single bloodline in mind.
I answered your question here, by the way >>#42