-->
@DebateArt.com
With the new inclusion of the moderation options when creating debates, it would be fantastic if there was a "Moderation lite" option.
I view this as along the lines of voter BoP still being required, while the trinity paradigm is optional... Basically actual shit votes can still be deleted, but a vote falling short of specifying one side being polite or not having sources is fine.
The specifics would need to be agreed upon by the moderators as something they're willing to do, with a MEEP for verification with the general population.
...
I was going to suggest a "Moderation extreme" option, but at that point people should just decide what judges they'll tolerate votes from. Regarding elected judges, I hold the opinion that unless their votes prove to be utter shit, they should be moderated (so moderation ultra-lite) by virtue of the debaters pre-screening them.