why should we improve our world due to climate change?

Author: n8nrgmi

Posts

Total: 41
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
then who's going to do all the cheap and dirty manufacturing work that "Americans" just  aren't  interested in any more.

So pay more for that kind of work. Easy fix for a retarded 1 solution mindset.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,078
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Greta is as Greta does....To be taken seriously and not to be taken too seriously.

Why are you fixated on a 17 year old Swedish school girl?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,078
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
#31.

Nope.    It just doesn't work like that....

Pay more = cost more.... Which isn't what the consumer wants...The consumer will happily buy cheaper Chinese imports.




Death23
Death23's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 618
3
4
7
Death23's avatar
Death23
3
4
7
-->
@n8nrgmi
Geoengineering is cheap and doesn't require hundreds of nations to all agree. Too bad people are too chicken to do it.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
I dunno...seems like the consumer is pissed about not being employed anymore. looks like 40 years of outsourcing has its own price. Make China great again isn't actually popular anymore.

Just ask Biden about that.
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
the consumer will take the cheapest thing he can buy.... it's the worker you're talkin about. he's pretty pissed to be havin his jobs outsourced. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
That's why we have tarriffs. If you wanna support China and you wanna see China great again, you can pay a sin tax for that. 

How's that  for cheap stuff?


n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
i do support targeted protectionism... which is the liberal goal, remember. but i dont support full scale trade wars. some people say trump is just playing hard ball to get what he wants, but he's even said if china wants to walk away from negotiation, he's cool with an indefinite trade war. that's not cool 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
he's cool with an indefinite trade war. that's not cool 

The alternative is appeasement and getting your elected politicians paid to shut up about China.

Absolutely not cool.
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
that's not the only alternative. traditional conservatives support free trade, traditional liberals support targeted protectionism... only trump supports a full scale trade war. that means we have two general alternatives here. laissez fair trade, or targeted protectionism. this second one sounds much more moderate, reasonable, and such. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi

Fuck China, and if the trade war hurts China, fuck them.