My vote will remain on Intelligence until someone convinces me of a better candidate. He's our best bet to lynch at the moment IMO due to his behavior in general. I see no other person who has posted enough substantive content to read them as town or scum besides Pie.
Satire Mafia DP1
Posts
Read-only
Total:
343
-->
@Mharman
I would prefer a shorter DP.
I'll have to think through who I want to lynch tonight. I don't have the time right now.
-->
@Intelligence_06
i gave my reasoning for every single vote i gave lmao
which vote didnt i give good reasoning on?
VTL Intelligence cuz 09 > 06
Well you can argue that it is of course "reasoning", but a very weak one nonetheless.
-->
@Mharman
i dont mind
-->
@Intelligence_06
that was a joke in the first dp we normally joke around an vote for ppl for dumb reasons
also,
u still havent answered my question so ill ask again
Lean-scum, actually. Either he doesn't know what he is doing or he is just trying to trick us.
can u please elaborate on how i lean scum?
-->
@skittlez09
This is why I say he is scummy, bad logic in general and bandwagoning lynches
-->
@Vader
@Intelligence_06
honestly it wouldnt surprise me but this seems just like noob town
idk how many games has intelligence been in?
-->
@skittlez09
2. He was less bandwagony in those two
-->
@Vader
ur right that is pretty suspicious an he hasnt answered my question yet either
-->
@Vader
This is why I say he is scummy, bad logic in general and bandwagoning lynches
Bad logic isn't a scum tell. It's just as common for town to use bad logic as it is for mafia. I'll have to look into the bandwagoning bit.
-->
@SirAnonymous
Fair but sometimes it becomes so prevalent it's anti town
-->
@Vader
That's very true, but anti-town doesn't mean scum. That being said, it is sometimes worthwhile to lynch anti-town elements.
-->
@SirAnonymous
I would disagree. Anti town is usually scummy in a lot of aspects. Anti town goals are scum goals IMO. Bad town =/= anti town
-->
@Vader
Bad town =/= anti town
Well, if you're going to split it up that way, then I see Intelligence more as bad town than anti-town.
-->
@SirAnonymous
I see him as more anti-town IMO, which leads to him being scummy
Welp, I guess this game has gone dead for a bit.
I'll come back in an hour
-->
@skittlez09
Oh so if that doesn’t count and it is a joke then there is no problem.
-->
@Intelligence_06
the games hella dead rn
what are ur current reads?
-->
@skittlez09
Well there is always a chance that everyone could be scum but all 3 of the suspicious ppl are cleared. So far there is no one exactly really scummy.
-->
@Intelligence_06
if the game doesnt pick up soon i say we vtl croc for inactivity
-->
@skittlez09
So far all people here doesn't seem scummy really. There is a 2/9 raw chance that Croc is mafia. This is what mafia is. You legit can't tell if my argument is town-on-town or town-on-scum. Of course the other guy wants to let us believe that he is town so all of us will spare his life, regardless of who they are. But the fact is that we will never know.
Unless through cheating such as hacking the other's IP and such, which is cheating and defeats the whole reason this game exists. The only reason we should just "vote" for an inactive player is if every other person is evidently pro-town. Honestly if someone is scum, he would 100% try to be as unsuspicious as possible. Croc at least gave opinions. Oro seems more suspicious in this way as he had given zero useful info that is subjective. Croc doesn't have a lot of time, but at least he is trying to play something whereas Oro had the time to play but posted nothing in the last 2 pages. To my standards, oro is much scummier than croc.
-->
@Intelligence_06
im not saying that croc is scum its a pretty big longshot
regardless croc has barely been active and may cause us problems in the future
if anything if he's town this will be much worse as we'll be short another vote
i forget who said it but a wise man once said that an inactive town will kill itself
-->
@skittlez09
I don't know if Croc is scum or not, although he is highly inactive. I'm a little more concerned about Bullish. In every game I've played in with him, he's been reasonably active. Not this time. However, the few things he has said are consistent with a town Bullish. I'm not really sure who to suspect right now. Of course, I rarely am sure in DP1. That's why players like Bullish (when active) are useful because they're willing to sus people in DP1 and be aggressive. Even when they're wrong, the discussion provides plenty to analyze.
-->
@skittlez09
It is probably more reasonable to vote him because he is inactive than that he looks like scum.
-->
@SirAnonymous
i think ive had bullish in a game or two so idk what his play is usually like
i dont scum read him rn cuz like u said from what he has said like when he answered my questions he gave a pretty good justification
-->
@Intelligence_06
yee
-->
@skittlez09
So this all comes down to the age-old question: what is more important, the cause or the effect? We can just tell that Croc is trying to do something but didn’t, and on the other side we have Oro who has the tendency to be very active but did nothing, playing so suspiciously unsuspicious that it is actually suspicious. Croc’s inactivity seems like a good reason to vote him, and in turn even if his position in this game is kept he is most likely going to not contribute much, even though he is trying to do something.
The same story with Pie. Nothing scummy but inactive.
Oro’s messages are all non-hostile, but the fact he has the motive to post on other threads and not this one would mean he is playing like this on purpose. It is more likely that Oro is scum but we will possibly lose more if Oro is actually town because he posts at will whereas there are people who does nothing because of real life struggles.