First corrupt FBI to plead guilty. Russiagate exposed.

That’s besides the point. When did he know about? Why did he know about it in the first place? According to you you shouldn’t have known right?

there is no “collusion” in the law books. What’s your point?

Mueller exonerated Trump and the campaign on criminal conspiracy charges which is the closest to “collusion.”

Not to mention you’re changing the topic.

information about the steele dossier and Carter Page had been public knowledge for months at that point. Everyone knew about it. You are surprised that the President knew about things that had been in the news?

this is exactly my point. Trump's team did collude with the russians. That is well established. But collusion is not criminal. That is exactly why trump popularized using that term rather than a more accurate one. Because no matter what information came to light, he could spin it as not being "collusion".

so he colluded with the foreign power that has been proven to have interfered in the election to help trump. That is established. It was not able to be proven he committed a crime while doing this.

you brought up mueller, not me.

The first investigation into Michael Flynn was set to close the day before that specific White House meeting. And no one knew of FISA abuses till at least 2018 lol. That shit was classified till at least 2018. But it still doesn’t answer the question of when he knew Crossfire Hurricane had started.

Why did Susan Rice write an email to herself about that meeting two weeks after it happened, minutes before Trump’s inauguration? Either way, the meeting implicates Jim Comey if not Barack Obama.

So what’s your point? He did nothing illegal?

So he did nothing wrong cause a crime can’t be proven.

Therefore exoneration cause the prosecution can’t prove a crime occurred?

the email you are using as evidence makes no mention of FISA or Crossfie hurricane. It doesn't say anything that anyone who watches the news would have known. 

it appears to be basically just notes for herself. It doesn't appear to implicate anyone of anything.

lol you appear to be confusing "wrong" with "criminal". If you scream obscenities at a child it might not be a crime. But it is still wrong.

still no. Mueller showed the trump team committed multiple counts of obstruction of justice, which is a crime. 

Obstruction of justice was left for Mueller to prosecute but he did not. He could’ve reccomended a crime to Congress for impeachment like Ken Starr did but he didn’t. Cause he knew there wasn’t enough evidence to do so.

So you’re telling me the investigation into Michael Flynn that was supposed to close a day earlier because the FBI found no wrongdoing continued because of Barack Obama and Jim Comey right? No American knew of that White House meeting lol

Who writes notes to themselves two weeks after the meeting, right before the inauguration saying Obama did nothing wrong and Jim Comey did everything. Why aren’t you in support of bringing Jim a Comey to testify?

But everything he did was legal right? 

If it’s not a crime per your logic and Mueller’s logic then Trump took advantage of the law just like rich people take advantage of tax laws.

Well thanks for conceding with regards to collusion no prosecutor would’ve pursued a case.

what are you talking about? The email you referred to did refer to anything that wasn't public knowledge. It was a person sending themselves an email about a discussion where publicly available information was discussed. Why do you think this is evidence of something?

Do you think you're making sense? You're not. You are just stating random things and seem to be convincing yourself that it is evidence of something. 

no. obstruction of justice is a crime. 

so your argument is that if a politician conspires with a foreign power against the interests of america, as long as it isn't technically illegal we should all just be fine with that? 

because collusion isn't a crime. Trump was the one who constantly repeated the line about collusion specifically because it wasn't a crime. There was never any question about whether he would be charged with "collusion".

They went with obstruction of Congress instead of obstruction of justice for grounds for impeachment since the evidence bar is so much lower for that.