Tyranny at Lafayette Park

Especially considering Joe Biden though Bill Barr was a great guy...

1.What reports

The shooting of the munitions came without warning, or according to multiple witnesses, without any provocation from the crowd.

"There was no warning. The crowd was entirely peaceful," Jackson Proskow, the Washington bureau chief for the Canadian outlet Global News, posted on Twitter.

On this occasion, however, the president's visit was unannounced, and church authorities were furious that the White House did not bother to alert them.
"There was no reaching out, no sense that it would require some sort of authorization before using the church as a backdrop in that way," said the Right Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, Episcopal bishop of Washington, with oversight responsibilities for the church.

"These are acts of domestic terror," Trump said in a Rose Garden speech Monday, moments after heavily armed troops and riot police advanced without warning on the largely peaceful protesters across the street from the White House.

The Rt. Rev. Mariann Budde, the bishop of Washington who helped organize the clergy presence at the church, said Trump’s arrival at St. John’s happened without warning and left her “outraged.”

Julia Dominick, a seminarian with the Virginia Theological Seminary in Alexandria, Va., and a former emergency room nurse, was tending to a hurt protester when a police line advanced.

“There was not a warning,” she said.

White House spokesman Judd Deere said in a statement that “the perimeter was expanded to help enforce the 7 p.m. curfew in the same area where rioters attempted to burn down one of our nation’s most historic churches the night before. Protesters were given three warnings by the U.S. Park Police.”
However, both reporters who were on the scene and protesters said they could not make out any audible warnings.

2.Sure, it was a riot that burned a church

3.it was different message

• Public health/safety
  

This one clearly. The order to move the perimeter back was given in the morning after the riots and destruction of the previous night. Come on man

Were the public's health and safety directly adversely affected by that specific protest?

Bill Barr is innocent because he said he is.

Is this a valid statement, especially given his aforementioned penchant for lying?

I read the intro to the lawsuit against Trump. It's total garbage and is probably going to be tossed out. I'll try to follow what happens with it.

I have video evidence that projectiles were thrown at the police and that the police gave warnings. Would you like them? Or would you prefer to hear what the media said?

If you have it, then show it.

13:55 Final warning given to back up

I heard it but it's hard for most people to hear when they are busy screaming "FUCKTRUMP"

24:17...instant karma as a protester gets hit with a frozen waterbottle aimed at the police.

Were the public's health and safety directly adversely affected by that specific protest?

Yes since the decision to do it was ordered early morning after the riots of the night.

You gave a transcript. Where is he lying?

A US Park Police spokesperson said Friday in an interview it was a “mistake” to insist in a statement on Tuesday that the agency didn’t use tear gas the day before in a Washington, DC, park to disperse a crowd ahead of President Donald Trump’s photo op, explicitly noting that pepper balls shot by officials irritate the eyes and cause tears.

“The point is we admitted to using what we used,” Sgt. Eduardo Delgado said. “I think the term ‘tear gas’ doesn’t even matter anymore. It was a mistake on our part for using ‘tear gas’ because we just assumed people would think CS or CN,” two common forms of tear gas.

This doesn't answer my question. Were the public's health and safety directly adversely affected by that specific protest?

This doesn't answer my question. Were the public's health and safety directly adversely affected by that specificprotest?

When they met resistance, yes. They announced three times. They didn't move. By the way, there was no tear gas used. The tear gas was used Sunday when they had to clear H Street to allow the fire department to come in to save St. John's Church. That's when tear gas was used.

Dude watch the video. Fucking waterbottles and bricks are flying everywhere, even hitting their own protesters.

This doesn't answer my question. Were the public's health and safety directly adversely affected by that specific protest?

Dude watch the video. Fucking waterbottles and bricks are flying everywhere, even hitting their own protesters.

This doesn't answer my question. Were the public's health and safety directly adversely affected by that specificprotest?

Seems to me you didn’t watch the video.

Even if they used the tear gas it would have been justified because there were projectiles being thrown at the cops.

You think pepper spray is tear gas? Cause that’s what your article is claiming. Irritation of the eyes was caused by pepper balls not tear gas. The smoke cane from smoke canisters.

The U.S. Park Service used pepper balls and smoke canisters, which irritate the eyes and throat and cause coughing, to disperse the protesters. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says, “Riot control agents (sometimes referred to as ‘tear gas’) are chemical compounds that temporarily make people unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin.”

The video you linked to was about the protest that took place on June 1st. I’m asking you for evidence for violence specifically on the June 2nd one. If you have a shred of evidence that there was violence in the specific protest on that day (June 2nd), then I will retract everything I said in this thread. Then, and only then. 

The U.S. Park Service used pepper balls and smoke canisters, which irritate the eyes and throat and cause coughing, to disperse the protesters. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says, “Riot control agents (sometimes referred to as ‘tear gas’) are chemical compounds that temporarily make people unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin.”

Protesters dindu nuffin. ignore the burned church and flying objects.

Might wanna check your dates. The “tear gassing” happened on the 1st not the 2nd. Please retract everything.

You left out this part: “Several different compounds are considered to be riot control agents. The most common compounds are known as chloroacetophenone (CN) and chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile (CS). Other examples include chloropicrin (PS), which is also used as a fumigant (that is, a substance that uses fumes to disinfect an area); bromobenzylcyanide (CA); dibenzoxazepine (CR); and combinations of various agents.”

Where is Pepper spray listed as tear gas?

Let me ask you this: When did the president take his photo?

Even if we assume that they just used pepper spray (which is not the case), are you saying that just because pepper spray isn't explicitly listed as tear gas, means that it isn't one? It says the most common compounds, not all of them.

As your article mentions it becomes a semantical argument. But if I get pepper sprayed by a girl, me claiming I got tear gassed is misleading even if it’s semantically correct. But all of this is besides the point. It was warranted as shown in my video.

The one with the Bible? Monday June 1st, 2020.

Please retract everything dude.