Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1

Author: Lucky

Posts

Read-only
Total: 804
Lucky
Lucky's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 117
0
1
3
Lucky's avatar
Lucky
0
1
3
Official Vote Count

Ragnar [4]: Danielle (180), sui_generis (184), coal (339), Lunatic (424),
Danielle [1]: oromagi (80),
Lunatic [1]: Zaradi (204),
sui_generis [1]: Ragnar (332),
Objectivity [0]:
oromagi [0]:
coal [0]:
Zaradi [0]:
airmax1227 [0]:

Not Voting [2]: airmax1227, Objectivity,

With 9 in play, it takes 5 votes to lynch.

Day 1 ends at 7:10pm EST Friday, May 22nd.

coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@airmax1227
Ok, that is helpful.  Read what I wrote in 448.  There is no way in my view you had read enough of the DP to know what was going on when you wrote 443 and the fact that you posted clearly from a position of having not read the DP suggests an informed perspective.  As scum you should have continued to lurk and made a more calculated response rather than post the response you did.  So yes I am not even considering VTLing you at the moment.  If you're scum then you're going to be more methodical and not take the risk of speaking without knowing what you're wading into, but if you're town you have less to hide.  You also didn't beat around the bush.  So I can see where you are coming from as town more easily than I can see you writing 443 as scum.  I am not town reading you, but I'm not scum reading you at this point either. 

Read the DP and update your thoughts.  I would like a list of reads and a statement of why you think those are your reads.  Indicate your thoughts on the Ragnar lynch.  
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
-->
@Zaradi
I want your thoughts on 273 as well, but I could only tag 5 people at once because...*shrug*
You make some very well articulated arguments re Luna's behavior... I'm going to have to go back and read through his posts while I read through the whole DP and keep your pointin mind. My only reservation is that I find DP1 difficult to take some of what people say too seriously sometimes because it is often to force themselves or others into activity or to illicit a response... But I do find what you have said here compelling and it's worth consideration. I'll get back to you on this further later
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@airmax1227
Edit to correct a typeo.

Ok, that is helpful.  Read what I wrote in 448.  There is no way in my view you had read enough of the DP to know what was going on when you wrote 443 and the fact that you posted clearly from a position of having not read the DP suggests an UNinformed perspective.  As scum you should have continued to lurk and made a more calculated response rather than post the response you did.  So yes I am not even considering VTLing you at the moment.  If you're scum then you're going to be more methodical and not take the risk of speaking without knowing what you're wading into, but if you're town you have less to hide.  You also didn't beat around the bush.  So I can see where you are coming from as town more easily than I can see you writing 443 as scum.  I am not town reading you, but I'm not scum reading you at this point either. 

Read the DP and update your thoughts.  I would like a list of reads and a statement of why you think those are your reads.  Indicate your thoughts on the Ragnar lynch.  

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,788
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@airmax1227
man, I don't know... I mean if I had a solid #1 scum read on DP1 and I knew there wasn't going to be any chance to lynch them or get further pressure on them, then I'd probably be fine going in a different direction... For better or worse, and it's probably the latter, I'm inclined to almost give everyone the benefit of the doubt DP1 and just assume any statement is an attempt at just finding something to point a finger somewhere and trying to get a result out of it...
Is this a long winded way of saying you think DP1 is kinda pointless?

The amount of discussion about inactivity proves that.
I wouldn't focus on that too much. First of all this game is very active considering we are only halfway through DP1, and two there hasn't really been all that much talk about inactivity. I've seen way worse.

 I mean at some points in this DP the main scum reads seem to be myself and Dani, and if I'm not mistaken the two of us happen to be the oldest and perhaps busiest individuals here.

Quite honestly I didn't get that vibe at all. Dani is pretty well town read, but wasn't here the first day so I can see why she was suspected a little bit. Also if I didn't personally know your situation with activity so well I would probably be a bit more worried about your activity. That is to say, I think your OMGUS on Coal is a bit un-justified. Weird to hear me type this, but I actually think Coal has had some pretty good analysis this game, and his playstyle seems to be a lot different than I remember. He seems to be prioritizing scum hunting to endless pages of argumentation that goes nowhere. I think your scum read on him is wrong, and I think you should re-consider a bit. That said, are you caught up? I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on stuff when you have had a chance to sit down and read the day phase. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,788
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@coal
Airmax's last post is very defensive, though he also goes on the attack to some degree with veiled threats that, I think, once he reads the DP he will likely re-evaluate.  In his post he makes some allusion to having sort of read the DP but this post suggests that he in fact has no idea what is happening, and likewise does not realize what has happened up to this point.  That is consistent with his claims of working all day, and reaffirms my judgment that he was not the ideal candidate for a lynch today.  He is also active now to at least post a multiparagraph response to a fairly aggressive activity prompt, and willing to take the risk of sticking his neck out even though he has not read the DP.   That suggests an uninformed perspective.  He has no idea, it seems, that I did not pursue his lynch.  That is, unless it turns out that he tells me he had read the DP in totality before posting 443 in which case I will need to consider further.  In any case this confirms my thinking that Airmax was not the best lynch, as is evidenced by the fact that I did not pursue Max's lynch despite expressing a willingness to do so. 
I too am getting "un-informed" vibes, considering he still think him and Dani are the most scum read people in the game. I figure his scum buddy might have at least told him that wasn't the case. 
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
-->
@Barney
I'm a firm believer in there being two types of scum. There are mafia who are forced to be scum, and townsmen who choose to be scum.

sure.

Getting rid of the first is how the game is won,  but removing the second isn't so bad.

Fair enough, though I hope we can see past the strategic scummyness and actually lynch scum.

Of course I did not know you were at work. Sorry about that, i did not mean to be an ass.
No worries man, it was tongue in cheek, I didn't mean to imply in any way that you were being an ass... good to see ya btw...

I'll keep your schedule in mind the remaining days.
I just don't want to be lynched for inactivity during the day time which is how it's going to be... but at the point where my inactivity is detrimental to town, a lynch on me is understandable and I'd expect as much... it is how the game goes. We certainly don't want to give scum a free pass just cuz they are lurking and creating excuses, so I'll do my best to keep any anti-town inactivity to a minimum.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,788
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@airmax1227
You make some very well articulated arguments re Luna's behavior... I'm going to have to go back and read through his posts while I read through the whole DP and keep your pointin mind. My only reservation is that I find DP1 difficult to take some of what people say too seriously sometimes because it is often to force themselves or others into activity or to illicit a response... But I do find what you have said here compelling and it's worth consideration. I'll get back to you on this further later
Please lord, do not take his case at face value without reading the context. First of all much of that is built on his lack of understanding. A big part of it suggests that I was "afraid" of pressure because I asked Danielle what her intentions for pressuring was, given she listed a bloc of four people. She later admitted she was looking for character claims and didn't realize that this was a themeless game. Zaradi should know this, but still based a case around mis-representing my "What are you pressuring for" as me being overly defensive, or scared of pressure lol. 
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@Lunatic
I too am getting "un-informed" vibes, considering he still think him and Dani are the most scum read people in the game. I figure his scum buddy might have at least told him that wasn't the case. 
Yes I agree and we are not lynching Max today.
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@Lunatic
Please lord, do not take his case at face value without reading the context. First of all much of that is built on his lack of understanding. A big part of it suggests that I was "afraid" of pressure because I asked Danielle what her intentions for pressuring was, given she listed a bloc of four people. She later admitted she was looking for character claims and didn't realize that this was a themeless game. Zaradi should know this, but still based a case around mis-representing my "What are you pressuring for" as me being overly defensive, or scared of pressure lol. 
We are also not lynching you today.  I think Max should come to the same conclusion I have come to on Zaradi's case for at least the same reasons.  
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@Lucky
Thank you.
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
-->
@Lunatic
Is this a long winded way of saying you think DP1 is kinda pointless?
I feel like it's generally not all that useful on DP1, though in the future, DP1 is very useful as a reference... but yeah, I don't take DP1, especially in a themeless game all that seriously. As I point out earlier, and I may be entirely wrong about this, it's just how I play I guess, I tend to give benefit of the doubt to DP1 posts since players are often creating posts not out of sincerity but forced play and attempts at interaction and response. I mean, we need to get some info and activity, so less than entirely well thought out posts are inevitable... When overanalyzed this can appear scummy when they are not. Heck, I'm not thinking too deeply about any posts I've made so far, and I can probably be called out on something I've said already if analyzed in a particular way.

I wouldn't focus on that too much. First of all this game is very active considering we are only halfway through DP1, and two there hasn't really been all that much talk about inactivity. I've seen way worse.
My bad then... I just know I was called out for it at least once... perhaps it isn't a thing in this game... I'll have a better idea of what the actual issues are once I've actually read through the DP more thoroughly.

Quite honestly I didn't get that vibe at all. Dani is pretty well town read, but wasn't here the first day so I can see why she was suspected a little bit. Also if I didn't personally know your situation with activity so well I would probably be a bit more worried about your activity. That is to say, I think your OMGUS on Coal is a bit un-justified. Weird to hear me type this, but I actually think Coal has had some pretty good analysis this game, and his playstyle seems to be a lot different than I remember. He seems to be prioritizing scum hunting to endless pages of argumentation that goes nowhere. I think your scum read on him is wrong, and I think you should re-consider a bit. That said, are you caught up? I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on stuff when you have had a chance to sit down and read the day phase.
I think it's probably fair to say at this point that I don't know what I'm talking about... I'm gona read through the DP now and offer some thoughts once I'm finished
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@airmax1227
Please continue to post those stream of consciousness updates like you have been doing as you read.   That is helpful. 
Zaradi
Zaradi's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 705
2
3
7
Zaradi's avatar
Zaradi
2
3
7
I dont think I'm ever hammering Ragnar unless the day's about to end in a NL. Like I just don't realistically see it. Sure coal there's a possible world where you're right and he's scum but why aren't we also pressuring Oro for the same reasons we're pressuring Ragnar?

His posts just read like apathetic townie who doesn't see value in behavioral analysis gathered during d1 but knows that town needs to be proactive to generate content but doesn't know how to actually go about doing that without analyzing behavior. To be perfectly honest playstyles like ragnar's and oro's are part of why I stopped playing on DART, but that's a rant for another day.

I dont expect my defense to save him, but if Ragnar flips green then Lunatic's vote should come under a *lot* of scrutiny.
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
Meh, now that I've read the OP I'm not all that thrilled about this game. A game with mostly vanilla townies is lame to me. It doesn't give the town much to go on. I know people think they can read behavior to an extent and perhaps these set ups have become the norm, but I prefer games with more roles so you can catch people lying in role claims, or lying about the action they took during the night. I guess we'll see what happens.

I agree with all of this... I already hate DP1' s and we can't even get a couple of mostly meaningless character claims to tie people down to... limits everything beyond behavior

Airmax's post felt forced, though not necessarily scummy.

It most certainly was forced... I had no thoughts on anything, and just posted whatever... I was literally forcing activity to serve the game in some way and also so that I wouldn't get mod-killed... Hopefully I can offer something more substantive today


Thoughts on possibly no lynching today just to avoid a (very likely) mislynch? 

I'm inclined to lean this way at this point since I don't think we'll have a great chance to hit scum... although by the end of reading the DP perhaps I'll feel differently..


Lucky
Lucky's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 117
0
1
3
Lucky's avatar
Lucky
0
1
3
Official Mod Ruling

As per post 11,

It seems that DebateArt allows you to edit your own posts. Use of this feature will result in an immediate modkill.
Objectivity has since used this feature twice. First, in post 286. Second, in post 376. After consulting with two outside sources, the unanimous decision has been reached to modkill Objectivity. As of now, Objectivity is dead. The day phase continues.

Objectivity, a vanilla townie, was modkilled day 1.

Official Vote Count

Ragnar [4]: Danielle (180), sui_generis (184), coal (339), Lunatic (424),
Danielle [1]: oromagi (80),
Lunatic [1]: Zaradi (204),
sui_generis [1]: Ragnar (332),
Objectivity [0]:
oromagi [0]:
coal [0]:
Zaradi [0]:
airmax1227 [0]:

Not Voting [1]: airmax1227,
With 8 in play, it takes 5 votes to lynch.

Day 1 ends at 7:10pm EST Friday, May 22nd.
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@Zaradi
But if we reach the end of the DP and the wagon remains, you prefer to hammer Ragnar than go to a no lynch?  You are willing to commit to this?  
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@Lucky
I don't think modkilling Adam was fair.  He obviously didn't know, and if he had have known would not have done that.  Now town is down another player and even though he was a vanilla townie this is highly prejudicial to the town. 
Zaradi
Zaradi's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 705
2
3
7
Zaradi's avatar
Zaradi
2
3
7
-->
@coal
I mean any lynch is strictly better than a NL, so yeah. 
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@Zaradi
Good.  Your point on Oro is also well stated, but Oro actually took a position whereas Ragnar did not.  I also have much lower expectations of oro than I do of Ragnar, who is a sophisticated and experienced player.   Oro may be that, but I don't have any independent knowledge of that.  

I maintain my town read of you.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
Fair or not, Objectvity is dead so now we have to figure out what to do. I believe he said we can mislynch 3x before mafia wins. His death is effectively us mislyching (down 1 townie) so if we mislynch today, then 1 more mislynch tomorrow might mean we lose -- correct?

In that case, do people still want to vote Ragnar or vtl today? I would say yes. We can probably learn more from that wagon than without. 

I'd also like to note that TUF feels a bit less town than he did earlier (mostly in his responses to Airmax). But I think at this point I'd like to hear from Oro, Sui and then probably move on. If Ragnar has anything insightful to add, now's the time...
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
-->
@coal
You mean beyond the fact that the few posts he's made are totally inconsistent with his town meta? 
I'll refrain from making a case against this for now, as I did in my initial response to you (which was just reactionary) since having read through a few more pages of the DP has swayed me a bit... but what even is my town meta? I mean I don't even understand how such a statement can mean anything at all (as it pertains to me), and you've said it at least twice... if it isn't just an attempt at prompting a specific reaction from me, then I honestly have a hard time as viewing as other than what I described earlier...
Lucky
Lucky's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 117
0
1
3
Lucky's avatar
Lucky
0
1
3
On the Modkill

Post editing is a highly exploitable feature. If I did not modkill Objectivity for editing multiple posts, then I both undermine the integrity of the game and create a world where other players can edit posts in the future and I have to start considering whether edits are worthy of a modkill on a case-by-case basis. The modkill had to be done as policy. Many other reasons went into the decision, but none of them are game-relevant. The decision was discussed with two other people and we reached the unanimous conclusion that a modkill was necessary. That is all that I will disclose about the decision-making process at this time.
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
Scum team is Coal and Lunatic... let's just lynch them this DP and the next and get the win

The modkill was unfortunate, but it's the rule, what can you do
Zaradi
Zaradi's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 705
2
3
7
Zaradi's avatar
Zaradi
2
3
7
-->
@airmax1227
Scum team is Coal and Lunatic
That's spicy. So then where's your vote?
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
-->
@Danielle
Does anyone think Airmax has a scum tell? (You don't have to say what it is - just if you think he has one.) 
I think I probably do, at least I knew a couple bad habits I had in those early days when I was scum... now I probably don't... it's been so long since I've been scum in forum mafia, and I've played so much live mafia that I've really honed my bullshittery
coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 1,950
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
-->
@airmax1227
Note for the record I am replying to 472. 

Further note for the record that your town meta requires many things.  At least one of those things is to be active and engaged.  At least one other is to be posting fairly insightful reads and moving the ball forward.  I don't see the utility in elaborating further because it is really at that low level of resolution that your pre-entry tonight play was inconsistent with your town meta.  There are more specific things I could say but I don't care now because you're doing what I think you should be doing, and I took a chance on TUF's suggesting that there was a good explanation (independent of mod psych) that I shouldn't be pursuing your lynch.  Plus other better options presented, hence the vote count.  

My thinking on you has clearly changed just as it did with TUF, but do continue to post these stream of consciousness updates.   This is helpful for me to understand what you are thinking and why at various points of the game. 
airmax1227
airmax1227's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 230
2
2
4
airmax1227's avatar
airmax1227
2
2
4
I think I probably do, at least I knew a couple bad habits I had in those early days when I was scum... now I probably don't..
This seems contradictory... what I mean is that I know I used to, and now I don't really know since I haven't played forum mafia as scum in forever, but live mafia has thought me some skills to avoid tells
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@airmax1227
Where do you play Live Mafia? That's what I thought this was. I thought we were setting up a Live game during quarantine because everyone was home. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,788
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Danielle
Fair or not, Objectvity is dead so now we have to figure out what to do. I believe he said we can mislynch 3x before mafia wins. His death is effectively us mislyching (down 1 townie) so if we mislynch today, then 1 more mislynch tomorrow might mean we lose -- correct?

In that case, do people still want to vote Ragnar or vtl today? I would say yes. We can probably learn more from that wagon than without. 
I am kind of leaning towards no lynching now with Objectivity being vanilla. Part of my read on Ragnar had to do with them being potential scum buddies. While the remaining points on Ragnar still hold true, I am not sure I want to risk a mis-lynch at this juncture. 

Unvote. VTNL