-->
@Buddamoose
But his role may not a huge PM analysis depending on the character...
no way a game like this is going have SO MUCH detail to have roles based off a script. While you disprove him script wise, storyline wise. He has a better point
But his role may not a huge PM analysis depending on the character...
Jeez for christ sake just because I am not posting every 10 seconds like taking a shit on laxative doesn't mean I'm not paying attention to the game
But I'm not using it, nor is rational as he de facto admitted to despite implying that's what he was using to falesly add authority to his analysis. Nobody here is.
He said that his role was just a town enforcer. How would you know that there has GOT to be more than just that?
What is your reason for FoS'ing Drafter? I understand you might otherwise have stated it, please go back over it.
What is your reason for believing Hammer is town and not scum? Understanding you might have already stated it, please go back over it.
Understanding there might be slight differentiations. But vast ones? Even last DP you didn't even agree with me about your own PM analysis(which is just based off your PM not mentioning Sally) and now you don't see that Hammers claim is starkly different than what every other person but Vaarka has claimed theirs to be like?
Then consider that you are misplacing your trust in Rational, especially in light of the numerous things I found some things to be entirely, or just in part, innaccurate.
When theres 2 similar roles, and its likely one is false, almost always the 1st person to claim is the true claim.
Honestly, I don't know how you can defend Drafter...he didn't role claim before Hammer role claimed.
If Drafter flips scum, this is going to make you look susp.
This is true, it's not like GP is bad. But also consider that such advocacy would generally bring undue attention upon oneself. Something mafia is generally disincentivized to do.
Vaarka isn't stellar, but fmpov he is good enough to have an understanding of how anti-town that is. It more seems like he was trying to keep doc off me so they could target me DP2 without worrying about doc being on me and making the save.
If could be that vanilla has the relative same PM to everyone. You don't know about any other roles.
Even if Draft sounds like our PM, that doesn't mean he's town. If a role like cop is a key role here, then there should be key differences in PMS
I don't think Lenny Pots is more of a viable cop than an Officer.Yes i know he was hired, but there is more to pots than investigative. He is one of the most honest people in the show. This could be implied to another role not cop.
Would you trust an administrative state cop or "personal detective".
He never gave a viable reason for RFDing me,
and just seemed to hop on the Hammer bandwagon last DP than
Dani already stated she is sure Hammer is scum. (whatevs)
It makes no sense...1st person to claim is almost 100% town...jani or no jani....if Earth was cop...why are there 3 cops in the game? It just seems like a long shot that Hammer is scum.
I just realized Meg could be the Mafia lawyer... it wouldn't fit the mechanics but it would the theme
Assuming you get mod confirmed....Right now I can't understand why our reads continue to be polar opposite...Why are you banking on character claim analysis? I've never seen it reliably implemented before.
I told ya'll I saw season 2 but don't remember it much. I think she leaves and returns? If she does leave for good, it must be in season 3 of after I stopped watching. I'm pretty sure I finished season 2. I'm gonna watch season 3 when I have time... this game has piqued my interest.Meg leaves during Season 2 though no?
If in fact Budda is scum, he should just come out now for the sake of everyone instead of delaying the game for no reason...
So everyone is lying? Because that's what this implies.
Omfg, it's not just a few people. It's every claimed PM is one way, and Hammers is entirely different.
Why are you operating as if both are telling the truth? Hammer or Drafter could be lying. Which person would you find most likely to be lying in a situation where everyone but one person corroborates X and Y thing.
Your definition of "viable" is suspect. The reasons for suspecting you were mostly more than viable. They continue to be viable. I disagreed with them, but that's my interpretation of your actions, not others. Nor is your interpretation of your own actions, the necessarily accurate one.
What are you talking about. Seriously, you say you aren't sheeping rational but you repeated, yet again, the same exact thing he did, which was nonsense. Drafter wasn't viewing Hammer as scum even through me trying to convince him. He ultimately found an independent reason that I hadn't yet to hold him as scummy.