-->
@fauxlaw
So:
How many individuals make up the total population of the U.S.A?
And how many individuals make up the Electoral College?
Now there's a simple statistic and a very unbalanced one at that.
The Irish have always been pretty good at bullying themselves.Don't be fooled by American Irish propaganda.
My point is that individual States have their own systems headed by a Senator.
Whereas the President is the head of state for the total "immaterial" population, representing a single system.
It would therefore be more logical if individual States were regarded as "immaterial" when electing the National head of state.
One person one vote
Why do you regard the people of the U.S.A. as immaterial?
One person one vote....A President elected by a majority of the people of the U.S.A....No contrived Electoral College vote necessary.
The Founding Fathers specifically advocated against majority rule because of its capacity for tyranny on the minority
Why do you regard the people of the U.S.A. as immaterial?
<br>So instead we have tyranny on the majority?.. and this is better how?
6 million votes of NYC out of 300 million is not enough for a majority. So your point is moot.
No, they are equally representative. 6 million lives in one place doesn't suddenly make them have fewer rights than if they chose to live spread apart.
6 million voters in two places don’t decide the course of the nation. Location does matter because each region’s culture is different obviously there are going to be some that are alienated. But the goal is to get a majority of the cultures which Trump did. He got the South, Maine 2nd, Midwest, Great Plains, Southwest. The only region he didn’t get is the West Coast. Democrats got Northeast, West Coast, A bit of Midwest, and some of Southwest. Trump has more appeal representatively.