Why call the religion "climate change" when it declares only one ideal climate?

Author: fauxlaw

Posts

Total: 62
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Not once an ideal is reached, assuming it can be. But that is absurdity of their argument. There is not one, stable climate to be reached in the first place, as I've alleged in the title of this string, and I mock it by calling it a religion, which is a concept of a future stability by whatever brand you call it. Climate, by it's very nature, is unstable, always has been, and always will be.
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@fauxlaw
If they were seeking a golden ideal then the answer to the question in post 56 would be "yes".

You correctly pointed out that the answer to the question in post 56 is actually "no".

Pretty simple.