Origin of Poverty

The origin of poverty stems from the fact that people have incompatible ideologies. There are two types of people in the world. Those that wait and those that don't and those that earn wealth and those that don't. The fractional reserve system was created in 1668 by greedy bankers.

How is the fractional reserve unethical one might ask?  

Originally, the markets of the world had a gold standard and resource value resembled the scarcity of supplies in the markets.

The banks invented money without wealth through the fractional reserve system. That is counterfeit by definition. 

Because credit goes to capital investment and consumer purchases, this means that a finite resource pool is used to initiate a chain of resource transactions for future projects, homes and consumer purchases. Supply is limited though so inflation increases. 

Wealth perpetuates new wealth creation. A finite number of resources can create more resources in the future in a capitalistic environment that places emphasis on the immediate consumer products that people want.

Credit Creation without wealth distributes resources unevenly to many projects that reveal themselves as bad investments in the future.

Keynesian Economics is flawed because it bankrupts people's incomes and money which isn't wealth. These Bankers are greedy and think that they do a service to society when they invest into projects, however, when the economy is booming and everyone has money, the most damage is done because banks keep lowering standards of credit and the economy comes over-heated with employment and activity that is utterly useless. 

A depression or a recession then develops a country and capitalism redirects the mismanagement of resources into projects that immediately satisfy the consumer and not the whims of the robber barons that like counterfeiting money.  

you have quite an imagination.

Poverty exists only for men though, no society wants women to fail but are willing to dispose men, it's why there is a push for women in fortune 500 companies and tech industries but not for the military,cops,coal mines, and general blue collar jobs

feminism is cancer

"Feminism is cancer" - axiom of truth

Males are more aggressive because of necessity for survival and they need to move up the dominance hierarchy.

Females are greedy. They want males to provide everything for them. Its selfish behavior. Biologically programmed.

It's their nature. But they give us sexual drive and babies so its a good trade-off. I love women and only accept monogamy because it increases happiness and nurtures care for mates. 

Only aggressive females should be in positions of power and not greedy selfish ones.

But back then they needed a man to provide otherwise they would starve

good post

Greed is the origin of poverty.

And feminism evolved and men couldn't do anything about it.

And cancer is cancer....axiom of truth.

"Monogamy increases happiness"?

Happiness is a temporary state of mind....Contentment is the permanent solution....And contentment doesn't require wealth or monogamy

Whereas greed festers discontent.

Greed exists from inequality. Genetic Uniformity makes egalitarianism. People like themselves.

Separation of like minded people of similar attributes is how I see people cooperating in unions temporarily until evolution begins again.  

I don't want to talk about inequality because it comes from aggression.

The universe seems inflationary so maybe enough distance will keep life from becoming hostile against different life.

Finding separation would be good.

Spys should be dynamic to avoid trust of a single women. She seduces man but man can resist. 

Resistance is futile!....Only joking....We have acquired strategies.....Though resistance is sometimes a struggle.

Social inequality is greed and poverty. Social inequality is also contentment and anxiety, good health and poor health etc.

Genetic uniformity breeds weakness and people may or not be happy with themselves. Happiness is temporary whereas contentment is permanent under relatively normal conditions…..Whatever relatively normal might be.

Separation is and likemindedness may or may not lead to cooperation.... Temporariness is relative to durability.....and evolution is.... and evolution is more than flesh and blood.

Too late the talking has begun and aggression is internal, whereas inequality may or may not be internal.

The universe is only speculation and life is either life or not.

Find separation, though one may not find contentment.

And spying begets knowledge and knowledge is key.

There's an easier gage of the kinds of people: Those who make things happen, those who watch what happens, and those who wonder what happened.

The makers are those who can create wealth for themselves and for others so some others, those who have a paradigm shift, can shift from watchers to makers. This is possible because what Oba'a told us, "There comes a time when you have made enough money," which implies that there is a stagnant money supply. He was completely wrong. The free-market capitalist system says there is no limit to the money supply, nor to those who know how to seek its increase. Does the result of such a system create an imbalance of relative wealth? Of course it does, because makers will make, regardless. Watchers may remain watchers, and may still benefit from makers, and potentially can become makers, themselves. But wonderers must change their paradigm before they will ever have the skills to become watchers, and only by that skill, elevate to become makers. 

You will notice one blatantly obvious lack of mention in the above: entitlement. Wealth entitlement is just my term for redistribution of wealth, which is nothing but entitlement. Giving a man a fish will feed him for a day. Teach him to fish, he feeds himself for a lifetime. Education. Acquisition of skills. Learning to do more than just work for money; learn to put money to work for one's self, and others.

So, it is not a measure of how much a person can earn at minimum wage. Why do Democrats push such a low goal? Because they want to keep you as a wonderer or a watcher. They want to be the only makers. That's not a capitalist system; that's what socialism is. It is a measure of whether you perceive a limit to the money supply, or an unlimited vista. Again, Democrats would have you perceive the limit as the only goal available.

Wonderers rule nothing. Watchers can at least see their are beneficial rules. Makers make the rules. So, be a maker, stop complaining that they exist, and become one. Yes, there are limitations, and some argue for them constantly. Familiarity breeds contempt; it all depends on what we do with our mirrors, which only sees what is behind us, plus us. We can't go through life driving while looking in the rearview mirror. That's why the windshield is always bigger.

The origin of poverty is when God created the Joneses to keep up with.