Everybody Is An Atheist

Author: Salixes

Posts

Read-only
Total: 37
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,081
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@BrotherDThomas
If you think about it logically the whole flood thing and the big boat and the subsequent regeneration thing just doesn't stack up.

So is it really worth getting hung up about?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,081
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mopac
Just as you are unwilling to entertain the idea that you might just be barking up the wrong tree.


Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@zedvictor4
I speak of things I know. I have spent plenty of time entertaining folly.

BrotherDThomas
BrotherDThomas's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,140
3
3
7
BrotherDThomas's avatar
BrotherDThomas
3
3
7
-->
@zedvictor4



zedvictor4,

YOUR REVEALING QUOTE: "If you think about it logically the whole flood thing and the big boat and the subsequent regeneration thing just doesn't stack up. So is it really worth getting hung up about?"

YES! With you stating what you did, it is even more important to bring this to light!  Get it?  It is a part of the scriptures, and since Jesus, as Yahweh God incarnate doesn't lie or change His mind, then it has to be taken as the truth, period! Therefore, it is to be discussed in no matter what the logical outcome is presented.

"God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?" (Numbers 23:19)

.

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,081
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mopac
You speak of things that you think you know.

Rather than things that you actually know.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Salixes
I have heard this "ultimate reality"argument before and Mopac is steadfast for a reason. He has absolutely no reason or argument in defence of his idiosyncratic belief.
Sure he does. And he answers when asked. You on the other hand, have absolutely no reason or argument in defence of your idiosyncratic hate.

I say this because I have seen this pattern quite a number of times.
Where Sal?

In each case the answer is the same and on each occasion, when answering a challenge, the answer is identical.
Sounds like you.

It (stating the ultimate reality) is no more than a smokescreen to hide a weak constitution.
Is racism the sign of a strong constitution?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,081
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
@ BrotherDThomas

You can take it as the truth if you wish. That's your prerogative.

I certainly cannot accept mythology as being wholly truthful.

There certainly may have been a Jesus character.

But the flood and the big boat thing just doesn't realistically stack up.

Therein lies the mythology.

A fact and fiction human contrived pseudo-hypothesis.

And the Christian pseudo-hypothesis is but one of many.