-->
@SirAnonymous
I've debunked this so many times. This is so ridiculous. There were several different possibilities that were obvious and fairly likely.
No you ain't debunk nothin. Everytime you "debunk" this theory you just contradict yourself more and more. Of the "several different possibilities" you came up with a grand total of TWO, both of which would mark Grey as scum! And you called one "obvious," the other "highly likely," which linguistically leaves little room for another probably scenario!
That may have something to do with the fact that I am usually wrong. Here's an interesting statistic for you: I have a 0% success rate at scum hunting. I have only lynched scum twice. One time, the mafia conceded. The other time, the mafia failed to vote, leaving me no choice but to lynch them. I have never caught scum of my own volition. Long story short, you shouldn't be surprised that I expect to be wrong.
Alright first of all I've been known to go back and dig up people's read accuracy and then call for others to "inverse" that person's reads. I now recognize that's an asshole move. But, the point here is you can't be ambivalent no matter how "good" you reason is, because the better reason from my perspective is that you're ambivalent because you're scum. You have to commit to something so you can be held accountable later in the game. The worst thing you can be in this game is to be afraid of being wrong. If you're wrong, no big fucking deal. It's a game and human behaviour is fluid.