How Much More Of This Nonsense Are We Supposed To Take?

Hey ET there aren't any names you are worthy of.

(The genius dodges the question again)

Try spamming your old post again, maybe it'll confuse people into not noticing you're using hypocritical fakery.

You're delivering messages for Satan now? Moving up in the world aren't you Dee Dee?

Still hooked on the troll all caps and bolding compulsion huh? What is it with you geniuses?

Let me give you an example. Say RationalMadman and myself had an RO, and I wanted to engage in a thread he is active in, so I start randomly insulting Ramshutu; but for some unfathomable reason I don't simply tag Ramshutu; but refer to him as "R." Then when a mod steps in I claim I was intentionally violating the CoC toward Ramshutu instead of RationalMadman... That in no way excuses the behavior.

Again, "Should this continue, we of the moderation team will be forced to more directly assist you in obeying the CoC."

So you are a fucking LIAR and hypocrite. I never referred to the thang and your post is absolute bullshit. I respond to etrnlwhatever as I fucking like, run away and masturbate on someone else you cock sucker.

What is continuing cock sucker?

You have the right to do as you wish, and as an adult take the consequences. This is your final warning: Any more violations to the personal attacks section of the CoC (be it toward EtrnlVw, ethang5, or anyone else), will result in the moderation team directly assisting you with your inability to obey the CoC you agreed to when you signed up for this site.

Before making any more posts, read the following:

Now show everyone where I have made a personal attack.

Explain how calling someone a troll is not a personal attack.

You were ignorantly incorrect in post 27 so in order that you don't admit that and in a pathetic attempt at saving face you resort to lying about me, run away.

So I re-read the whole thing. The CoC is much better. It's clearer and has guts.

1. See quoted text in message #27.

2. I have not called you a troll. You imagining persecution because you're not being persecuted enough, is however fascinating.

3. You have failed to show any inaccuracies in #27. You used personal attacks with ambiguous naming of the person you were attacking.

You really are a soft cock. In post 27 you accused me of referring to the thang thing and I corrected you in that stupidity so you needed to attack me in order that such a pathetic individual could preserve face. You're a primary example of power corrupting. You were fucking wrong and you lack the guts to admit to it. You are a non entity as you've proved. Fuck off

Inaccuracies? Absolute lies. Look here soft cock

You were fucking as wrong as you can get but as a nazi given power you are incapable of admitting it and so abuse your power as such as you would. Run away coward.

ET called me a troll is that a personal attack, cocksucker?

I see your pet has responded regarding me.

You won't do anything and we all know why.

YA DOBBED ON. 

That's SOFT AS.....

Take it back.

Why?

Well the OP was.  HOW MUCH MORE OF THIS NONSENSE ARE WE SUPPOSED TO TAKE?

So what he said was a simple test. 

He has shown to me and I'd say a few here EXACTLY how much nonsense one is supposed to take. 

Point proven. 

Saying that two times to Mopac, doesn't make it true.

Anyway.    Are we to "love" our brothers and sisters or are we to "hate" our brothers and sisters?

Anyway, Is Mopac a sheep or is he a human being?

They will as soon as you do.

Can barnyard animals post to the board or can they not? Its your comment, why is it so difficult for you to make up your mind?

https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/3524/how-much-more-of-this-nonsense-are-we-supposed-to-take?
 
Posts 94, 96,97,98,99,100
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/3347/one-of-the-most-enigmatic-verse-in-all-christianity?page=4

After all that blather, you still dodge the question. Why?

Still no answer. The question is from this thread.

You're upset about the bibles use of the words "hate" and "love". But you do the same thing with words too.

Words can have more than one meaning, and can be used in different ways. But when you are asked about it, you run crying to the mods.

I asked you repeatedly because you dodged. So this is the correct thread. Tell us, how come you can use simile but you object when the bible does?

Talk about a double standard.

Jesus is not teaching a new commandment of hating people. He is teaching about the cost of following Him.
The clue is in Luke 14:33 when Jesus says:“In the same way, any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple.”
It’s about what we must be prepared to do to follow Jesus. It’s about giving up everything, even our very lives for Him. He doesn’t say, “by doing this you will get into heaven”. Jesus clearly teaches that through faith in Him we have eternal life (John 3:16). Through His death on the cross, we have the forgiveness of sins (Romans 6:23).
However, as His followers, are we willing to place Him in first position and place the most important people in our lives in second place?
Let’s paint the scene. In Luke 14:25, large crowds were travelling with Jesus because they had seen him healing people, feeding people and teaching people at no cost. Why not follow Jesus? You can get something for nothing. However, in this passage we see Jesus turn around to them that following him is not without cost - you have to place him before other important people in your lives. You even have to place him before yourselves.
To get his point across he uses very emotive and challenging language - you must hate everyone else. In so doing he is not saying that you do it literally but you must be prepared to put everything else second. So if your parent forbids you from following him then you must disobey them and so on.
Thankfully many of us have never been put in a situation where we have had to choose between Christ and our loved ones. But imagine if you had been captured by religious terrorists and they demand that you deny Christ or watch one of your friends die what would you choose? Jesus is saying you must choose him.
But it can be more subtle than this. In the stress of working and making ends meet we can be tempted to cut down of church activities, reading the bible or praying because we don’t have time. It may be the things you are working hard for are good things that will allow (say) your kids to have a better education. Jesus is saying don’t pursue these things at my expense - nothing, not even your wife and kids, is more important than following me and obeying me.
Its not easy but Jesus promises that he will provide for all our needs. See Matt 6:25-34 and also Mark 10:17-31. Both these passages talk of God’s rich provision for those who seek to follow Jesus above and beyond everything else.

I see.

Just like you're doing the bible.

But the two words are not in the same verse Otis. Why couldn't "hate" in Luke 14:26 be like "sheep" in your comment? Having a different meaning?

But only one word is used in each verse Cletus.

You used sheep, but did not mean barnyard animal.

Why can't you see that the bible used hate, but did not mean dislike?

Why are you the only one who can use simile? Neither of the verses use two words. They do not contradict unless you insist on saying "hate" has only one meaning and take the word out if context.

What if I had another comment by you where you used "sheep" to mean a barnyard animal. Could I then claim you contradicted yourself?

How can you not be embarrassed to post such stupidity? Is the rush you get from castigating the bible worth being a public fool? Really?

congrats. I can see too

Good post Doc.