Choosing Best or Likely Candidated to Win Presidency

Your mostly focused only on that part of my rational.  I think a moderate has a better chance against Trump.

Warren and Bernie I would prefer, but doubt their most liberal polices to sell to greater USA.  I dunno. Time will maybe tell.

This is critical to bringing out the vote for those who do not trust anything electronic.  Some where recently some district tried out their new electronic voting and it was debacle. 

And who is more likely to cheat. Republicans or democrats?  Putin or China?

I feel like for democrats the real question in deciding a candidate is figuring out your main goal. 

Biden, for example, has great odds at beating Trump however has little to offer in terms of the policy. At least in my view. 

Bernie, however, is almost the exact opposite, he doesn't have a good chance at beating Trump due to his socialistic policies. However, at least in my view, he has a lot more to offer than Biden has. 

Overall if you're a democrat before you consider a candidate you'd like to support I'd advise you to first figure out what your goal for the 2020 election is. 

Why? That is what the corporate media keeps telling everyone, but the evidence says that isn't true. Sanders has the best favorability rating of anyone. He speaks to the 10's of millions of Americans who can't stand the democrats or the republicans. Hilary was the quintessential "moderate" candidate and she lost. Why would we re-do that mistake?

The much bigger issue is the voter suppression laws that keep people from voting. I think the number of people who would avoid voting because of electronic voting machines is extremely limited and getting smaller all the time.

I agree that election security should be taken seriously, but that is far from the biggest priority. 

Hillary was more popular than Bernie.  That was why she was the candidate. Why she lost to Trump is a differrent issue.

We will never know how well Warren or Bernie will do against Trump, if hey are not the candidate. I place Warren above Bernie for reasons I gave.

Age { and no heart attacks yet },

 woman { tho men favor men }

 similar polices as Bernie,

has Teddy Roosevelt's rough rider enthusiasm.

Some aspect gerry mandering got overturned by the courts a few months back. 

Amy is not the only one pushing for paper ballots. Her proposed law just goes a little further and calls for additional verification process to be included.  Paper ballots cannot be hacked and that will gain trust of those voters who dont trust electronic systems, and for good reason.

We are already there. State controls 90% of the media.

Yep, they are part of the 10% resistance.

I don't want any president to get 90% unfavorable reporting, no matter what the source is when 90% of the people don't hate him.

Media shouldn't create outrage and narratives, that's not democratic.

Especially when that outrage is purchased by hedge fund managers on the left (Soros) and right (Singer) that are ready to make money when the country fails due to the paralytic fear-mongering.

you are mistaking 2 unrelated things. Unfavorable reporting should happen when a president does something bad. Whether or not uninformed, racist, cultist etc people like the bad things he is doing should not shield him from that reporting..... And on fox news it is virtually 100% positive coverage. That is because they aren't even trying to be news. They are just propaganda.

I'd say Fox is about 70% favorable after they lost Shephard Smith, but it's not all bad considering Fox gets high ratings.

So the media still isn't near close to fair nor balanced in proportion to public support of the president.

At least USA doesn't tax the poor at 40%

Don't be silly.