-->
@Athias
Provide me a direct reference.
I can’t because as I’m typing this, this isn’t the future.
If that's your premise, then you should not argue that magic doesn't exist.
I didn’t argue magic doesn’t exist.
Yes. So why are trying to shift the burden of proof? You are the one who made the claim that the flood was a "made up" story. And then when asked to support your claim, you attempted to shift the burden of proof by asserting that only those who claim that it happened have an onus using a bastardized logic. Can you support your claim? Will you support your claim? If not, then drop your argument.
What argument?
What is "my" belief system?
The belief system you’ve espoused.
That's on you. And so far the only waste of time is this posturing you've continued after I've demanded several times that you support your claim. If you're not going to support your claim, you are within your discretion to refuse me a response. But I will consider it a dropped argument.
What claim? What argument?
Your convenience doesn't matter; that which you are "all for" doesn't matter; logical consistency matters since you are invoking onus probandi. And thus far, you haven't applied any logical consistency to your arguments. Support your claims or drop them. It's a simple task.
What’s the task?