-->
@DBlaze
There is a reason it is against the law.
The question is are those reasons actually good? Do they actually address the problems they are suppose to or do they make them worse? The war on drugs has been going on for decades yet today they are more easy to obtain are far more potent. "Just Say No", the D.A.R.E program, mass incarceration - all massive failures to meet the goal they've set out.
You think people just arbitrarily make laws?
Arbitrary in the sense that there is literally no sense or purpose for the law to exist? No. But if by arbitrary you mean based on ones own personal whim and motivation regardless of the common good - it would be entirely ignorant to say anything other than yes, people do make arbitrary laws that only suit their interests. Bad and immoral laws can be passed, it's not that difficult. Republicans do it all the time.
We are not dogs that understand reward training more than discipline, that is why we don't get rewarded for not doing anything wrong.
This sentence does not logically follow. Humans are like any animal and are susceptible to reward training and cognitive feedback loops. In fact discipline is just a more sophisticated/mature feedback loop.
We understand the consequences of breaking the law.... if you don't want to go to jail, don't do it. It's that simple.
An unjust law is no law at all - and it is ones civic duty to protest such a law even if it means breaking it. It's obviously not that simple when you care out an exception for opinion users but condemn every other drug user - who's to say trying to medicate emotional pain with drugs is worse than trying to medicate physical pain? Clearly when one gets addicted after the pain is gone they're taking the pills for greater reasons than mere pain relief.
As for the article, you'll have to explain why certain aspects wouldn't work. So far your refutation of drug use has come down to a blind loyalty to the law and some vague appeal about divorce rates.