let's say you had lived as a contemporary of Joan of Arc, a devout Christian who claimed that God spoke to her, telling her it was his will that she help lead France to victory against England. Judging her claim against the "blueprint" of the Bible, would you have believed her?
I do not know enough of her story to make a decision at present. I have not done much reading on her or the culture of the time.
That's a valid answer. I don't consider it a dodge. Intimate knowledge of the situation is necessary to make an informed judgment.
Yeah, I would botch it up.
You say you believe some wars are just, and I agree -- well, more like I think some wars start for reasons that are just. But do you think that God ever truly supports the sociopolitical goals of certain nations or powers, ever favors one side over another in a political conflict? He was known to do this in the Bible. Do you believe he takes sides in post-biblical history?
I see Him blessing nations that honor Him. I believe the USA is one of those nations. I see similarities when nations forget or turn from Him to what happened with OT Israel.
I used to have a friend who claimed to be a "Word of Faith" or what some call a "name it and claim it" believer. I struggled with his teachings for years, questioning them and praying about them and their truth content. Finally, after much prayer and answers, the Bible became clearer to me on such teachings and I rejected these claims. I did not see any witness of what he claimed believers should be able to do, yet he had claimed to have done some of these acts he spoke of. He believed that one day he would be able to go into a hospital and do what the first-century disciples did in healing the sick, and yes, even raising the dead. He also believed that believers should be the richest people on earth, yet he lived a pretty meager existence.
I'm not really clear on what the "Word of Faith" movement is. But why does conditional salvation mean it must be you who saves you?
There is always truth in false worldviews because they related to God in some way but I see the "word of Faith" movement it as aberrant Christianity. They twist the gospel message into something it is not. One of its many teachings is that we should be able to do the miracles that Jesus commisioned the early church to do. Another is that we as Christians should be the richest people on earth. Another is the gift of tongues.
Conditional salvation was the message of the Old Covenant. It is the message of all world religions, but one. Conditional salvation is whether or not you can measure up to God's requirements. Christianity is about the One who has, and what He has done for those who will believe.
She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”
Again, there is nothing of ourselves in the Gospel message of salvation. It is by His grace that we are saved.
Ephesians 2:8-10 (NASB)
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.
We, as Christians, cannot boast of what we have done, our good works, before God as merit in His eyes to earn our salvation because we fall short of His perfection and purity.
Two beautiful works give an understanding of this if you are ever interested: