What do you guys think of the American election's candidates so far?

Author: DynamicSquid

Posts

Total: 62
DynamicSquid
DynamicSquid's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 182
1
3
11
DynamicSquid's avatar
DynamicSquid
1
3
11
With the recent 5th debate airing a couple days ago, I formulated a new thought on the candidates...

Joe Biden
- seemed kinda dull this time
- forgot what he was going to say at one point

Cory Booker
- seems like a cool guy
- nothing special though

Pete Buttigieg
- He's actually pretty good
- I like the way he spoke

Tulsi Gabbard
- She's actually doing pretty good
- Still nothing special though...

Kamala Harris
- More of a emotional speaker
- Nothing special here

Amy Klobuchar
- kinda forgot she existed...

Bernie Sanders
- His ideas about government reform are so good
- Although he's a bit old...

Tom Steyer
- Climate change, cool
- Still new to the debate, but made a good impression

Elizabeth Warren
- Doing pretty good
- Although still nothing special

Andrew Yang
- Favourite candidate by far
Hope he gets more media coverage though...


What do you guys think?
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@DynamicSquid
The only people who have a snowball's chance are Warren, Sanders, Biden, and (a huge maybe) Buttigieg(but really really doubt it).

Sanders, Warren, and Harris are utter psychopaths.

Gabbard, Biden, Buttigieg, and maybe Klobuchar can sometimes make a lick of sense.

The rest I don't really care to dignify with a response.
DynamicSquid
DynamicSquid's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 182
1
3
11
DynamicSquid's avatar
DynamicSquid
1
3
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
Really? You think Sanders has a chance?

His ideas are great, but his only downside is his health, and that's a major one (https://fortune.com/2016/09/14/hillary-clinton-health-poll-concerns/).

I also think that Biden is dying down, and might not be the front runner soon.

And what about Yang? Why don't you like him?

bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@DynamicSquid
Sanders has the same base as Warren, so whichever takes the lead in the primary states will take over that radical base. 

Yeah, Warren is the most likely in my opinion. Sanders' health isn't helping him.

Biden is dying down, but he basically owns the moderate base.

Yang is just kinda lame. "I'm an Asian, so I know math." Very cringy. Doesn't measure the opportunity cost of the UBI. When you redistribute wealth, how will it affect producers that have to pay for all of that? He keeps talking about automation, but I have yet to hear his plan on how to accommodate those changes. 

UBI: $1,000  per adult per month, correct? We have 209,128,094 adults. So, that is $209,129,094,000/month. $2,509,537,128,000 (so $2.5 trillion per year). Seems rather expensive. How will the benefits exceed those costs and how will taxes rise to pay for this?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,963
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@DynamicSquid
I'm still hoping Warren pulls through.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@DynamicSquid
The dems will not pick the person to most likely be able to beat Trump. They will fall from in party politics, just like in 2016.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
As a conservative it's not surprising that you can ignore the FACT that almost every developed country has universal health care. You won't find any fascist countries who do, telling ain't it?
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
Sanders has the same base as Warren, so whichever takes the lead in the primary states will take over that radical base. 
Actually, they have very different bases. Sanders' base is mostly working class and multi ethnic. Warren's base is mostly upper middle class white people. Warren and Butigieg actually have very similar bases. This is why as Pete has risen lately, Warren has been falling. Sanders and Biden also have very similar bases. 

Yeah, Warren is the most likely in my opinion. Sanders' health isn't helping him.
At this particular moment, I would say the most likely is Biden if he can hold on, which is far from certain. He has been really low energy, he constantly loses his train of thought and often just says stuff that doesn't make sense. Sanders is 2nd most likely, he has actually passed warren in the polls. Her terrible healthcare plan(s) have really hurt her. Buttigieg is a seriously long shot because he has no appeal among black or latino people. 

no one else has even a remote chance. 
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@disgusted
There aren't currently any fascist nations in the world, so.... no?

Plus, fascism isn't right-wing. It you actually knew what it was, you would understand that.

bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@HistoryBuff
I meant that Warren and Sanders have similar platforms. Whoever drops out, the other will likely inherit that base. It may currently be divided socioeconomically and racially right now, but if they care about policy, the base will run to the other.

Yeah, Buttigieg really has no chance. I have heard he is doing well in primary states and the first two are crucial. I heard Warren is falling behind because of her grossly unpopular tax plans to pay for healthcare and other programs. Biden has been falling in the polls, but people still like Obama and most centrist Democrats like him.
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
I meant that Warren and Sanders have similar platforms. Whoever drops out, the other will likely inherit that base. It may currently be divided socioeconomically and racially right now, but if they care about policy, the base will run to the other.
If you look at the 2nd choices of candidates in polls you will see this is not the case. The top 2nd choice for Biden supporters is Bernie. The top 2nd choice for Bernie supporters is Biden, not warren. The top 2nd choice for warren was Bernie though. If warren dropped out, that would probably help Sanders. If sanders dropped out, that wouldn't really help warren. 


Buttigieg really has no chance. I have heard he is doing well in primary states and the first two are crucial.
Pete is dumping huge amounts of money into the early states. They are kind of his wheelhouse, IE overwhelmingly white. He might be able to do well in the 1st few states. He will get destroyed on super tuesday though. And with Duval Patrick and Bloomberg jumping in, that might undermine pete and drop him back. 

I heard Warren is falling behind because of her grossly unpopular tax plans to pay for healthcare and other programs.
I would agree with that assessment. Her plan to pay for it was a cop out. It relied on savings from immigration reform and a head tax on companies that will obviously fall on workers. But it lets her say the magic words that she won't raise taxes on workers, at least directly. Her implementation plan is also really dumb. 

Biden has been falling in the polls, but people still like Obama and most centrist Democrats like him.
Biden's support is tricky. He is kind of the candidate for old people. If you look at his support, it is almost exclusively from people over 50. Basically, people who have already built up their life in the current system and are afraid of change. But there are very few people who are excited about him. If you go to a Sanders or Warren or even a Butigieg rally, you will see lots of people who are excited by their candidate. You see almost none of that from biden supporters. It will be interesting to see what kind of turnout he supporters will have. 
DynamicSquid
DynamicSquid's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 182
1
3
11
DynamicSquid's avatar
DynamicSquid
1
3
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
Seems rather expensive. How will the benefits exceed those costs and how will taxes rise to pay for this?
Hmm... It's no question that a UBI would help the society, but I hate to see when people talk about the cost of a UBI.

It's cheaper than you think.

bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@DynamicSquid
So, you don't think that higher taxes will have any negative impact?

I showed the costs according to his math.

Your source says we currently pay $500 to $600 billion every year. I showed how it would cost more. $2.5 trillion if every adult can get $1000. If this costs less, I would prefer it to regular welfare programs. But, poor people use drugs a lot. Could we be subsidizing drug addictions of poor people by giving them money?

Supposedly a 10% VAT will cover it. I would have to look into how a VAT influences consumer spending.

bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@HistoryBuff
If you look at the 2nd choices of candidates in polls you will see this is not the case. The top 2nd choice for Biden supporters is Bernie. The top 2nd choice for Bernie supporters is Biden, not warren. The top 2nd choice for warren was Bernie though. If warren dropped out, that would probably help Sanders. If sanders dropped out, that wouldn't really help warren. 
Ok, that is interesting that Bernie supporters would go for Biden instead of Warren. Biden's policies are much different than Bernie's, while Warren is just a slightly more moderate version of Bernie. Doesn't make much sense to me, but if that is what the polls are saying, I guess that is how it is.

Pete is dumping huge amounts of money into the early states. They are kind of his wheelhouse, IE overwhelmingly white. He might be able to do well in the 1st few states. He will get destroyed on super tuesday though. And with Duval Patrick and Bloomberg jumping in, that might undermine pete and drop him back. 

I felt Pete might have a chance if he wins Iowa because historically, that is how it has gone with Democrat primaries. The only anomalies have been Bill Clinton and Howard Dean. I don't feel like the demographics are a big player because this is the trend and the demographics of those states haven't radically changed as they have in Texas, Arizona, and California.

I would agree with that assessment. Her plan to pay for it was a cop out. It relied on savings from immigration reform and a head tax on companies that will obviously fall on workers. But it lets her say the magic words that she won't raise taxes on workers, at least directly. Her implementation plan is also really dumb. 

Yeah, I read what you said about her implementation. Two-part plan? Seems really dumb to me because she will miss the initial push you get from the election. Based on the Senate, I don't know if any Democrat could push any plan they want, though. At least Bernie admits that he will raise taxes on the middle class.

Biden's support is tricky. He is kind of the candidate for old people. If you look at his support, it is almost exclusively from people over 50. Basically, people who have already built up their life in the current system and are afraid of change. But there are very few people who are excited about him. If you go to a Sanders or Warren or even a Butigieg rally, you will see lots of people who are excited by their candidate. You see almost none of that from biden supporters. It will be interesting to see what kind of turnout he supporters will have. 


Yeah, Obama was the "Change" man. Biden doesn't really act like he wants to deviate from the status quo, so I doubt that he will get Obama's turnout.
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
Ok, that is interesting that Bernie supporters would go for Biden instead of Warren. Biden's policies are much different than Bernie's, while Warren is just a slightly more moderate version of Bernie. Doesn't make much sense to me, but if that is what the polls are saying, I guess that is how it is.
That isn't really true. Warren and Sanders are quite different. She has also been fairly inconsistent on issues. She was also a republican for most of her life. Many progressives don't trust her. 

I felt Pete might have a chance if he wins Iowa because historically, that is how it has gone with Democrat primaries. The only anomalies have been Bill Clinton and Howard Dean. I don't feel like the demographics are a big player because this is the trend and the demographics of those states haven't radically changed as they have in Texas, Arizona, and California.
Recent polls have put butigieg at less than 1% support among black people. He recently put out a plan for how he would help black people, then sent out a letter showing all the black people who supported the plan. The problem was that half the people on the list were white. And of the 4 headline people they were touting, literally none of them endorsed Pete, 1 had already endorsed Sanders. Only 1 even supported his plan. He outright lied about having black support, to make it look like he had black support. With numbers like that, he has no chance at all. 

Yeah, Obama was the "Change" man. Biden doesn't really act like he wants to deviate from the status quo, so I doubt that he will get Obama's turnout.
It's also a little weird that so many black people like him. Obama picked him because he was as white as they come. He is also pretty right wing in the democratic party. I mean he pushed Reagan further right in the war on drugs, which was catastrophic for black people. But the media basically wont say a bad word about him. Biden pushed policies for decades that cracked down on black people. 
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@HistoryBuff
That isn't really true. Warren and Sanders are quite different. She has also been fairly inconsistent on issues. She was also a republican for most of her life. Many progressives don't trust her. 

They both want a wealth tax, higher taxes on the rich, higher corporate taxes, and ultimately, universal healthcare, loan forgiveness of some sort(Bernie wants all forgiven), and free college. I don't think Warren was ever a Republican. I personally hate both, but I like Bernie a little better. He seems genuine, and I think that he would actually do some good attacking special interests. It is just that I hate about 9/10 of his other policies and therefore couldn't see myself ever supporting him.

Recent polls have put butigieg at less than 1% support among black people. He recently put out a plan for how he would help black people, then sent out a letter showing all the black people who supported the plan. The problem was that half the people on the list were white. And of the 4 headline people they were touting, literally none of them endorsed Pete, 1 had already endorsed Sanders. Only 1 even supported his plan. He outright lied about having black support, to make it look like he had black support. With numbers like that, he has no chance at all. 

I mean, if Pete wins the primary, he gets de facto support because of voting demographics. African Americans vote over 90% Democrat since the 1960s. Maybe turnout would be lower, but they wouldn't vote for Trump.

It's also a little weird that so many black people like him. Obama picked him because he was as white as they come. He is also pretty right wing in the democratic party. I mean he pushed Reagan further right in the war on drugs, which was catastrophic for black people. But the media basically wont say a bad word about him. Biden pushed policies for decades that cracked down on black people. 

Yeah, he has a really good record on women's rights, I have heard and choppy on supposedly "racist" policies. Why does making drugs illegal necessarily have to be anti-black? Do black people use drugs more often?
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
Still ignoring the FACT that almost every developed country has universal health care.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,963
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@disgusted
Just the ones that tax the poor at 40%.

This is why I support Warren, because she will mirror the tax codes of the EU.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
@pollywanna
Try to find some education.
I'm not about to converse with someone who is proud of ignorance and continually displays that pride.
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@disgusted
Are you ignoring the FACT that we have a more competitive economy than most of those countries? The only ones that are more competitive have lower corporate tax rates than us, Hong Kong and Singapore. And your loony lefty Bernie Sanders is intent on raising that. 
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
Your economy is crap if it supports the plutocracy rampant in your country.
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@disgusted
Well, we have the strongest economy in the world. If ours is crap, I shudder to think of what yours is.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,963
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@bmdrocks21
It's an economy where the poor are taxed at 40% rates so the government can provide mandatory services.

That will never happen in the land of the free. Taxes are still optional for the poor in the USA through Lottery games and Powerball, and none of the services are mandatory.

Socialism died with the Obama-lie about keeping existing choices for services.
Americans are way too hooked on choices.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
Plus, fascism isn't right-wing. It you actually knew what it was, you would understand that.


disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
It's an economy where the poor are taxed at 40% rates so the government can provide mandatory services.
Do present the figures in support of this.

That will never happen in the land of the free. Taxes are still optional for the poor in the USA through Lottery games and Powerball, and none of the services are mandatory.
Fairy tale land.

Socialism died with the Obama-lie about keeping existing choices for services.
Americans are way too hooked on choices.
Americans don't understand the words used by the rest of the world, Americans have been indoctrinated into paranoia for 70yrs. Americans are hooked on the ignorance your leaders have been feeding you for decades.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
Read post #21
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
They both want a wealth tax, higher taxes on the rich, higher corporate taxes, and ultimately, universal healthcare, loan forgiveness of some sort(Bernie wants all forgiven), and free college. I don't think Warren was ever a Republican. I personally hate both, but I like Bernie a little better. He seems genuine, and I think that he would actually do some good attacking special interests. It is just that I hate about 9/10 of his other policies and therefore couldn't see myself ever supporting him.
They have some overlap in policies. But they are radically different in their approaches. Warren wants to cozy up to the democratic establishment. Bernie wants their corrupt asses to actually do what the people want. Warren will bend when the establishment refuses to play along. Sanders wont. 

I mean, if Pete wins the primary, he gets de facto support because of voting demographics. African Americans vote over 90% Democrat since the 1960s. Maybe turnout would be lower, but they wouldn't vote for Trump.
That's a bit of a catch 22. he needs to win the primary to get any kind of support from black people. but he needs support from black people to win the primary. He can't win unless black people decide to support a small town white mayor whose short political history does not show him doing well for black people. 

Yeah, he has a really good record on women's rights, I have heard and choppy on supposedly "racist" policies. Why does making drugs illegal necessarily have to be anti-black? Do black people use drugs more often?
Making drugs illegal isn't necessarily anti-black. But setting harsh punishments is. White people, and especially white people with money are much less likely to have the harshest penalties enforces on them. Black people, and especially poor black people, are much more likely to have the book thrown at them for drug crimes. So the war on drugs fell disproportionately hard on people of color. It has destroyed alot of lives in those communities. Highlighting Biden's role in pushing for the harshest war on drugs he could get would be really bad for him if he managed to win the primary. 
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@disgusted
Well, Fascists have historically been socialists, so.... there's that. Are you arguing that socialism is right-wing?

bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@disgusted
Read post #22
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@HistoryBuff
They have some overlap in policies. But they are radically different in their approaches. Warren wants to cozy up to the democratic establishment. Bernie wants their corrupt asses to actually do what the people want. Warren will bend when the establishment refuses to play along. Sanders wont. 

Only time will tell.

That's a bit of a catch 22. he needs to win the primary to get any kind of support from black people. but he needs support from black people to win the primary. He can't win unless black people decide to support a small town white mayor whose short political history does not show him doing well for black people. 

Yeah, but you mentioned how Iowa is incredibly white, and I said that those who win Iowa typically win the primary.

Making drugs illegal isn't necessarily anti-black. But setting harsh punishments is. White people, and especially white people with money are much less likely to have the harshest penalties enforces on them. Black people, and especially poor black people, are much more likely to have the book thrown at them for drug crimes. So the war on drugs fell disproportionately hard on people of color. It has destroyed alot of lives in those communities. Highlighting Biden's role in pushing for the harshest war on drugs he could get would be really bad for him if he managed to win the primary. 

Ok, so your issue is with enforcement and not necessarily the war on drugs?