Try again. What right do you have to know what growth is being removed from her body?
Do you support the death penalty?Did you support the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Because that "growth" is a living human being, and people don't have the right to kill innocent human beings.
If I oppose bodily autonomy for the sole reason that I oppose abortion, then by the same logic women oppose their own bodily autonomy. If they don't oppose their own autonomy, then I don't oppose it either. Which is it?
I don't need to invade their bodies to find out that they're trying to remove a child. The very fact that they're seeking an abortion tells me that.And how do you know that it's a fetus (not a living human being) and what gives you a right to invade a woman's body to make that determination?
You don't understand your objection to abortion and don't understand the patriarchal system in which all American women are suppressed.
Answer the question or prove that you are a lying hypocrite.
I don't need to invade their bodies to find out that they're trying to remove a child. The very fact that they're seeking an abortion tells me that.
How do you know that said woman is seeking an abortion? If a woman uses a hospital how can you invade their body?
What do you do to decide that a woman is having a tumor removed, you deluded sub.
I don't understand my own objection?
Different procedures have different names, and people have to tell the doctors what procedure they're there for. No invasion necessary.
I am defending existing human life. I have presented a strong case that the unborn are alive and human? Why don't you refute it?
If I oppose bodily autonomy for the sole reason that I oppose abortion, then by the same logic the majority of women oppose their own bodily autonomy. If they don't oppose their own autonomy, then I don't oppose it either. Which is it?
Of course not. You're a godist aren't you?
How do you determine what a woman is having removed from her body and why should you have a say in it?
This question is as meaningless as it gets.
BTW do you support the death penalty?
Because in order for her to seek an abortion, she has to tell the doctor what operation she wants. I have a say in it for the same reason I have a say in outlawing other types of murder.
<br>Also....You are forgetting that a sizable amount of women are against abortion as well. So should the elected politician completely ignore and refuse to represent those women? And yes, you don't need to be a slave to be involved in slavery. You also don't have to be a woman or aborted child to be involved in abortion. There are entire businesses, doctors, etc that stand to profit from it.
If you want to stray away from hypothetical situations, would you say that Sharia Law is a valid framework? One in which they abuse women and kill homosexuals?
But personhood means absolutely nothing! It is not based in any sort of science whatsoever. It is some arbitrary, fabricated concept that can be used to justify any human-rights abuse.
I've already answered these questions. You won't get different responses if you keep asking. It is up to you to engage with my answers if you don't understand or disagree, not move on and then cycle back to the same questions as before which is what you seem to be doingThat does not answer the question. What are the characteristics of personhood? At what point does one gain personhood?
Not one word of this is true. I can't tell if you're maliciously misrepresenting me or too stupid to understand what I've written as it seems rather clear.You said you don't know when personhood starts and it can't be defined. How then can you claim aborting unborn babies is ok because they don't have "personhood," but you yourself don't even know what personhood is?
When do you draw the line?
Answer these questions- Is it ok to abort a 1st trimester baby?-Is it ok to abort a 2nd trimester baby?-is it ok to abort a 3rd trimester baby?-is it ok to kill a born baby?
