-->
@RationalMadman
For sure, the original development of religion as an hypothesis was not irrational.
Though the continued adherence to such archaism does seem somewhat irrational, given our current levels of understanding.
But there again, I suppose that the continued transfer of information, archaic or otherwise is just human nature.
So in general I would have to agree and say that despite the known insubstantiality of archaic religious hypotheses, the development and ongoing transfer of religious data is only to be expected.
