"the greater good"

Author: 3RU7AL

Posts

Total: 177
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
and yet they push hard for the electric cars, lol, yeah no special interest there I'm sure.
There's "special interest" on all sides. [LINK]

locally, there are advertisements for natural gas generators, so as with hydrogen cars, that would work in the same way to generate household electricity.  No ugly, expensive panels or wind turbines,
Just beautiful generators?  Is this really a quibble about aesthetics?

...and yet again they push hard for these things.......  Follow the money.
There's tons of MONEY on all sides.  Isn't that called, "free-market-competition"? [LINK]

Are you suggesting MONEY = EVIL?
Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,320
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
-->
@Greyparrot
Also how are we supposed to stop the predicted fossil fuel increases in China, India, and Africa...all of which are experiencing their own industrial revolutions requiring massive amounts of fossil fuels but their usage is magnified by their relatively much larger populations than the USA...at least 5 times more people in those emerging economies than those living in the USA and Europe combined....

Do we just docilely accept the damage these countries are inevitably going to do to the planet while we ride our bicycles in the snow munching on soyburgers?
We won't stop people from rising out of poverty around the world, but maybe we can choose trade policies that respect our values, deal more closely with countries that respect those values, and encourage manufacturing in the US and its allied countries where it is most accountable. 
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
I was looking at that graph and noticed something neat. China currently has 2 times the CO2 output of the USA, and is on track for 3x CO2 output within your lifetime.

Even if USA went to "zero" CO2, the planet is already fu*@!ed.
Perhaps we should pioneer the first sustainable underground bio-dome human scale terrarium? [LINK]

Do you really think "doing nothing" is the best option?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
If you are all in on climate change destroying the planet, we should already be at war with India and others.
How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,' when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye. [LINK]
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Are you willing to put 5 billion people in prison for destroying your planet?
It's not the individuals that are at fault for any of this.

It's the classic "free-rider problem".

First, do it yourself to prove that it can be fixed and then share the technology and "best practices" with the rest of the world as CHEAPLY AS POSSIBLE (possibly open-source, open-patent).
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Christen
There are strategies that you can use to compensate for their variability.
What kinds of strategies?
Batteries, hydraulic energy storage, compressed air energy storage, "smart" power grids.

Individual consumers can do almost nothing to "stop" pollution.
Maybe not, but we can plant trees, clean up trash, clean up litter, throw out garbage, avoid hoarding useless items for years, try to live a minimalist lifestyle, and keep our homes as clean as we reasonably can. That doesn't necessarily "stop" pollution, but it does drastically reduce it.
Not really.  If you want to live a minimalist lifestyle you should do it for personal reasons, you're not "saving the planet".

(1) Significantly dial back industrial petroleum use.

(2) Significantly dial back industrial pollution.

(3) Plain paper, aluminum and glass can replace plastic in 90+% of consumer packaging.  But this is NOT the consumer's responsibility.
I'm against banning plastic because plastic is easy, cheap, and versatile.
That's great.  I'm not advocating "banning all plastic".  Plastic is actually more "sustainable" for many "not-single-use-disposable" products.

Furthermore, how does plastic cause climate change? Plastic isn't a fossil fuel.
PLASTIC IS MADE OUT OF OIL.

Should everyone stop going to church because that doesn't stop murderers from slaughtering innocents?
Yes, everyone should stop going to church not only because it doesn't stop murderers but also because it's a waste of time and money and they could be doing much better things with their lives as opposed to worshipping their "god" for the sake of going to this magical fantasy land called "heaven".
Going to church does apparently have some psychological benefits. [LINK]

Have you ever heard of the "free-rider problem"?
Who are the ones free-riding here? It can't be the producers because they have to put in work to produce things using energy. It can't be the consumers either because they usually have to pay for things, not free-ride.
Here's an example that "clicked" for me.

Imagine you live in an apartment building where the water is only metered to the building and not to each individual apartment.

The water bill for the building is divided evenly by the number of occupied apartments.

If you use almost no water, your bill barely changes.

If you use a ton of water, your bill barely changes.

HowEVer, if everyone ran their water constantly, everyone's bill would go up.

This is the "free-rider" problem.  How do you incentivize conservation?
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
Why is this devolving into a climate change topic... jeez. It's really simple, both sides arguing are right. Climate change will happen (so we can prepare for it)... but since it's going to happen a bunch of a-hole humans that crave power will use it to gain said power politically / otherwise (therefore there are likely exaggerations). It's funny to me how just bc this issue became a left issue (which i agree is likely to gain political power), the side that doesn't like the left outright is skeptical... freaking politics. Climate change will happen... best to prepare for it. But honestly, i also wouldn't be surprised if we don't even have to prepare for it and it will just be something we will deal with when it starts affecting our lives. If we have to move to cooler places... then, that's just what humans will have to do. 

Vaccinations is way more interesting... In relation to this topic. If i truly believed something would harm someone i care about... i wouldn't do it unless i was forced to (but then same mentality on the reverse - if a non-vaccd kid harmed someone i care about). So, if not being vaccinated truly becomes a problem, we will have to force people to do it... or, keep them away from society. Maybe make a colony of people that don't want to vaccinate. 
TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
Just beautiful generators?  Is this really a quibble about aesthetics?
they can be installed in basements, their footprint is a fraction of solar panels, they don't require rare metals that are mined in China, nor do they require the special and extensive wiring and other support devices solar needs.  Quibble?  yeah ok

Are you suggesting MONEY = EVIL?
not at all, 'climate change' isn't immune to the special interests and money influence no matter how some try to paint it.  I was explaining the many reasons 'climate change' sounds more like a conspiracy than factual.


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
China and India are clearly free-riding by increasing Fossil fuel consumption while the USA decreases.

What are you going to do about those free-riders?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
Well said.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
What we should be doing is what Outplayz suggested.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
China and India are clearly free-riding by increasing Fossil fuel consumption while the USA decreases.

What are you going to do about those free-riders?
First, do it yourself to prove that it can be fixed and then share the technology and "best practices" with the rest of the world as CHEAPLY AS POSSIBLE (possibly open-source, open-patent).
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
What we should be doing is what Outplayz suggested.
I'm on board with "preparing for the worst".

HowEVer, this doesn't do anything to solve "the greater good" problem.

Do you force people to move to higher ground and build hurricane-proof (self-sustaining) homes?

Do you cancel their insurance and dissolve FEMA?

What about the companies that will inevitably profit from these policies?

Will you automatically discredit them because they are making money (like your "Big Green" "conspiracy")?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
USA is already "doing" it by decreasing CO2.

What are you going to do about China and India? Why are you willing to sit back and watch them destroy the planet while doing nothing to stop them?

Even if the USA went carbon zero, China will still have 3x the current USA CO2 emissions in your lifetime. Let that sink in, that is THREE USA's worth of CO2.
What are you going to do about it?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
Just beautiful generators?  Is this really a quibble about aesthetics?
they can be installed in basements, their footprint is a fraction of solar panels, they don't require rare metals that are mined in China, nor do they require the special and extensive wiring and other support devices solar needs.  Quibble?  yeah ok
That sounds promising, but can't we have a mix?

If you don't like what my solar panels and windmill looks like, why should I care?

Are you suggesting MONEY = EVIL?
not at all, 'climate change' isn't immune to the special interests and money influence no matter how some try to paint it.  I was explaining the many reasons 'climate change' sounds more like a conspiracy than factual.
I don't believe anyone suggested that any company and or policy is "immune to special interests". [LINK]

I'd love to believe that "climate change" is a conspiracy.  Seriously.  Please link your best evidence for this and I'll definitely check it out.
TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@Outplayz
Why is this devolving into a climate change topic
there is actual evidence for vaccines, climate change is prediction/speculation, you can see the effects of disease on unvaccinated children.

TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
If you don't like what my solar panels and windmill looks like, why should I care?
again look at how and what is needed to make solar panels (batteries) then look at what is needed for the generator, which is more environmentally friendly?  
Have you ever looked into cobalt mining?  If not that could be a real eye opener for you.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
This is where the whole "greater good" argument falls apart. There is no nation on the planet in a position to force China to not emit 3x USA's CO2 emissions. So it doesn't matter what the greater good is, only what is possible matters.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
there is actual evidence for vaccines, climate change is prediction/speculation, you can see the effects of disease on unvaccinated children.
And of the well documented evidence of the negative reactions a minority of patients suffer from the vaccine itself. [LINK]
TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
yep that does happen no link required, same is true for all medications, procedures and even foods, being alive is dangerous.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
If you don't like what my solar panels and windmill looks like, why should I care?
again look at how and what is needed to make solar panels (batteries) then look at what is needed for the generator, which is more environmentally friendly?  
Have you ever looked into cobalt mining?  If not that could be a real eye opener for you.
Have you ever looked into natural gas fracking?  I'm not looking forward to well water that tastes like paint.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,986
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Most well water naturally tastes like crap. Nature is full of natural toxins.

If you aren't getting water from a water treatment plant, you are retardedly trusting nature to keep you healthy.

Nature is deadly.
TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
I was thinking of hydrogen, like for the cars.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
climate change is prediction/speculation
Sure, but there is evidence and i would at least heed some of the predictions.

In regard to Vaccines... should they be mandatory? 

TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@Outplayz
I don't see enough evidence to pay it much heed, I mean like G.P. said how are you going to stop other countries etc

Non vaccinated people are only a risk to themselves and other non vaccinated people, it's a choice.  Though i find it ironic those who want mandatory vaccination but want more people from other countries who probably aren't vaccinated.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
I don't see enough evidence to pay it much heed, I mean like G.P. said how are you going to stop other countries etc
I think that's a bigger problem... the world's division and the collective forgetting we live in this reality together. Maybe climate change is destined to teach us a lesson. 

Non vaccinated people are only a risk to themselves and other non vaccinated people, it's a choice.  Though i find it ironic those who want mandatory vaccination but want more people from other countries who probably aren't vaccinated.
Can't it be a problem for older people or some others with at risk immune systems? 

dustryder
dustryder's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,080
3
2
4
dustryder's avatar
dustryder
3
2
4
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
Non vaccinated people are only a risk to themselves and other non vaccinated people, it's a choice.  Though i find it ironic those who want mandatory vaccination but want more people from other countries who probably aren't vaccinated.
Vaccines don't confer complete immunity and vaccinated people are still at risk from non-vaccinated people given enough exposure. Of course, the amount of exposure is markedly less for those who cannot get vaccines or are otherwise immunocompromised. Which is the point of herd immunity as a result of mandatory vaccination.

So it's not just a matter of placing yourself and others who have made a conscious choice to not get vaccinated, it's also a matter of placing those who have not made that conscious choice at risk

TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@Outplayz
Can't it be a problem for older people or some others with at risk immune systems? 
no really, if you are immune you are immune otherwise people who work in pediatric offices and the like would be fk'd  People who are immuno compromised should already be taking precautions.  we are responsible for our own health.

TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,383
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
-->
@dustryder
if you look at the modes of transmission for many of these diseases you take the proper precautions.  there was a time we didn't have wipes for grocery card handles. ooohhh the horror.  the risk may not be as dire as you think.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,167
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Al Gore and Barack Obama - deniers of climate change. They don’t think water levels will rise. They’re deniers folks. DENIERS