MEEP: Doxxing, Spam, Ban Log

Author: bsh1

Posts

Archived
Read-only
Total: 62
#31
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@bsh1
Would it be okay to clarify:

A spam debate would be an obvious commercial advertisement, or one of a set of multiple debates that appear to be solely created in order to flood the system with new debates rather than legitimate attempt to engage in debates?

I think its worthwhile pointing out debates should only be removed when it’s obviously spam or an attempt to flood the system with multiple debates a- rather than an odd debate here and there.

#32
Club
Club's avatar
Debates: 26
Posts: 296
1
3
9
Club's avatar
Club
1
3
9
2. Should "for spam" threads be prohibited?

Yes

3. Should accepted spam debates be prohibited?

No

#33
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
1.  Yes
2. Yes and remove all spam related post that are constant spam of the same thing. This includes Dr. Franklin's YEETs and his We are all gonna dies! And all of omar2345 posts. Most of them are frauds. 
3. No
4. Yes
#34
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Vader
This includes Dr. Franklin's YEETs and his We are all gonna dies! And all of omar2345 posts. Most of them are frauds. 
Fraud? 

#35
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,305
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@bsh1
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
#36
WaterPhoenix
WaterPhoenix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,094
3
3
10
WaterPhoenix's avatar
WaterPhoenix
3
3
10
2. No
3. Yes
#37
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@bsh1
I think that spam threads should be prohibited.

Debates with banned users should definitely not be permitted. They give super easy wins to some people who skyrocket in the leaderboards. This then undermines the leaderboard of any real meaning.(I'm looking at you RM)
Topic's author
#38
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
Question 1

Yes - 13
No - 0

Question 2

Yes - 7
No - 5

Question 3

Yes - 9
No - 3

Question 4

Yes - 12
No - 3
#39
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. No
4. Yes

#40
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@bsh1
1. Should anti-doxxing protections be extended to nonusers whose identity is not already publicly known?

Yes

2. Should "for spam" threads be permitted?

Yes

3. Should accepted spam debates be permitted?

No

4. Should there be a public ban log primarily for permanently-banned users and with some information on temporarily-banned users?

Yes
#41
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 5,626
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@bsh1
1. We should have anti-doxxing measures put in place for non-members.
2. Spam threads should be allowed.
3.Spam debates should be prohibited.
4. There should be a public ban log.
#42
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 5,626
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
You should respect DDO’s culture. Without it, this site may not be the last haven for debating as it is today.

Who were the first to join the site? DDO users.
Who still makes up most of the site’s active base? DDO users.
Who gave this site its culture simply by carrying over their culture? DDO users.     
#43
spacetime
spacetime's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 206
0
1
3
spacetime's avatar
spacetime
0
1
3
-->
@bsh1
These administrative notifications are literally worse than DDO spambots.
#44
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,465
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
  1. Yes,
  2. Yes,
  3. Yes, and
  4. Yes.
As a reminder, giving admins permission to act against these problems, does not mean they will act against everything resembling them. Like with votes, borderline are noted as such, but left in place. So Mafia threads while resembling spam threads, should be unaffected.
Topic's author
#45
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
Question 1

Yes - 16
No - 0

Question 2

Yes - 10
No - 6

Question 3

Yes - 11
No - 5

Question 4

Yes - 15
No - 3

Topic's author
#46
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@spacetime
Sorry you feel that way.
#47
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,698
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
#saveourspam
#48
dustryder
dustryder's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,080
3
2
4
dustryder's avatar
dustryder
3
2
4
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. No

Topic's author
#49
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
Question 1

Yes - 17
No - 0

Question 2

Yes - 11
No - 6

Question 3

Yes - 12
No - 5

Question 4

Yes - 15
No - 4


Topic's author
#50
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
Time Check

About 7 hours and 15 minutes remain to cast or alter your vote in the MEEP.
#51
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,283
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
-->
@bsh1
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Yes
  4. Yes


#52
Castin
Castin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,266
3
2
7
Castin's avatar
Castin
3
2
7
1. Should anti-doxxing protections be extended to nonusers whose identity is not already publicly known?
2. Should "for spam" threads be prohibited?
3. Should accepted spam debates be prohibited?
4. Should there be a public ban log primarily for permanently-banned users and with some information on temporarily-banned users?
1. Does this mean I can't tell a story about my mother assaulting a claw machine at the arcade in 1997, spitting invectives like "give me my daughter's fucking toy" and "tear you apart you goddamn cheatie piece of shit."

4. I really don't think any information on a ban log should be on permanent display, even permabanned users. The log should be for people to whom this is recent and relevant information. Nothing needs to be up there longer than a matter of months.
#53
sigmaphil
sigmaphil's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 12
0
1
6
sigmaphil's avatar
sigmaphil
0
1
6
-->
@bsh1
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. No
#54
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
Yes to all.
Topic's author
#55
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
The MEEP voting period has now since closed. I will be double-checking the vote count to ensure there are no inaccuracies, and then I will be declaring the results. Please be patient.
Topic's author
#56
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
Final Vote Count

Question 1

Yes - 20
No - 0

Question 2

Yes - 14
No - 6

Question 3

Yes - 14
No - 6

Question 4

Yes - 16
No - 6

Results

Out of 20 votes, the binding threshold for a MEEP is 12-8, while out of 22 votes, the binding threshold for a MEEP is 13-8. As such, all of the referendum questions have passed. Implementation of these new policies will be effectuated when the Code of Conduct and Extended Moderation Policies documents have been updated to reflect the changes.

Thank you again to all who have participated. As always, it was good to get the community's feedback on these important issues, and we hope this overhaul of the voting policies will foster more robust and honest voting practices in the future. This MEEP will be switched to read-only sometime within the next 24 hours.

#57
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,698
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
This website is officially under fascist rule
#58
DapperMack
DapperMack's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 72
0
1
4
DapperMack's avatar
DapperMack
0
1
4
-->
@Dr.Franklin
It was never going to be especially great to begin with, and will die soon if it hasn't already. (Not speaking about the MEEP in particular) 

#59
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,698
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@DapperMack
This website is not dead, I think it will grow.
#60
DapperMack
DapperMack's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 72
0
1
4
DapperMack's avatar
DapperMack
0
1
4
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Yeah maybe but I still don't think it will ever be a great site. 

If I am wrong then that would be nice.