You missed the point. My point is there is no consensus on what is hate speech, or even if hate speech exists.
No consensus in Christianity given there are so many sects. Have you got better criticism?
It depends on whether or not the user who said it is joking.
So you expect a moderator to understand a person is joking without them saying it? You know there is of course a better way of doing things like state it is satirical and make sure it goes in the lines of what is acceptable. That is it. Wylted did neither.
This is a red herring.
Demonstrate to me how me saying "Who is to state there is a God or isn't?" is a red herring?
And this is an ad hominem.
Ad hominem: typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
Yes I did but earlier I already gave you a response.
Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater puts public safety at risk. Calling someone a "nigger" does not. Your comparison is invalid.
Shouting fire causes harm to people. Call someone the n-word also causes harm. Do you disagree?
Should we ban the use of the word "fucker" to describe another person too?
If it carried the same impact as the n-word then yes but it doesn't.
No. Where did you get that from? In fact, the legal system protects a person's right their own beliefs.
Just in America and in most cases. Across the world it is not the case. You also neglected to mention the other things the government is responsible for like protecting and managing the well being of their citizens. There is no point having freedom of speech when you are too busy being violently or verbally oppressed is there?
That assumes they are a criminal in the first place.
That statement was made after the fact.
Just because someone believes black people are inferior doesn't mean that they're going to start lynching black people. A person could believe something absolutely horrible but still seek legal means to acheive their goals.
So we should give white nationalists a platform because they might not want to kill black people just you know get gullible people to join their group and make them act like the soldier carrying out their bidding?
