There'll never be closure on whether God exists

It's an open ended question and we will never truly know the answer. 

Define "exist". Define "god".

It's an open ended question and we will never truly know the answer.

It's an open ended question and we will never truly know the answer.

"open ended} = infinite and there exists only two kinds of infinite this or that.

1} macro-infinite non-occupied space that embraces/surrounds our finite occupied space Universe, and,

2} conceptual infinite ex there exist infinite set of numbers.

We deduce truth from other truths.  We only observe a finite occupied space Universe.

Finite = integrity --systemic and structural integrity ergo naught { occupied space } can be created nor destroyed and only existent in eternal transformable configurations { shapes/patterns } recyclable { closure } existencte

Infinite = lack of integrity i.e. no closure.

Yet people assume he exists.

And "he" stems from patriarchal religious base.

If people want to follow a rational, logical common sense pathway of thought they need look no further than the 5{phi}-fold icosa{20}hedron to grasp how 5{ phi } contains 4 { VE }, 3{ structure }, 2 { four kinds of unity } and 1 { " U "niverse }

See LINK to understand how geometrically the 5-fold contains 4-fold and this also applys to any linear numerical system 

And the 4-fold cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron  ---7 opening axi--  aka the Vector Equlibrium { VE } is representative of zero and .."the closet we will ever come to knowing God"...Bucky Fuller

The 4-fold VE is based 12-around-one{ -in the oven } ergo the VE is pregnant with the 13th spherical in its womb.

If the 13th one-in-the-oven is born outward   ---as ex electron tunneling--- the VE via is jitterbugging transformable abilities --due to its square openings---  contracts to a quasi-5{phi}-fold icosahedral configuration. LINK

4-fold VE is representative of Female that is pregnant ergo matriarchal systems not patriarchal and representative of stability of structural fermionic matter of Universe.

5-fold icosahedron is representative of the stability of  female { Xx }structural as bosonic forces of Universe.

The 5-{fold} pentagonal dodeca-hedron that  is representative of the less stable male { Xy } because it has not triangulation.

In conceptual equality we have three X chromosome for every y chromosomes in Universe

A black hole may consist of both 5-fold ergo contains 4-fold, 3-fold 2-fold and 1-fold. LINK and this is just the primary set. We can take the number of new axi produced to get another higher set and the set of spinable axis only increases if not an exponential increase.

However, Archmedes discovered that the the four internal hexagonal areas of a spherical cubo-octahedron is equal to the outer convex surface area of that same cubo-octahedron and this is abstraction that approximates the mathematics of Jacob Bekenstiens black hole and holographic mathematics ---later confirmed by S Hawking---. See LINK to see how a 3-fold tetrahedron when brought to zero volume, ---as it maintains{ not lost } its four surface planes---   a VE is defined with 12 extending triangles { EMRadiation from a black hole??? }

Black holes evaporate and again, naught { occupied space } is naught lost.

Belief in God does not imply belief in books.

Never said that. 

Belief that God exists is belief that there is Ultimate Reality.

And the 4-fold cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron  ---7 opening axi--  aka the Vector Equlibrium { VE } is representative of zero and .."the closet we will ever come to knowing God"...Bucky Fuller

To clarify on why God is closet we will ever come to knowing God, is because of the equanitmity --perfect balance---  between two primary forces of Universe;

1} OUTward distintgrations forces ex EMRadiation and dark energy )(,
......24 radii of VE{ 12-around-1 sphericals cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron..........

2} INward integration forces ex magnetism and gravity ( )
.......24 chords of VE { 12-around-1 sphericals of the cubo-octahedron........

When the VE is constructed four hexagons ---spherical or Euclidean---   we find 24 radii anad 24 chords are involved.

Digging up a 17th century Philosopher and attempting to confound with definition and gobbledygook, doesn't prove a sausage.

You are talking about books again.

The word "God" with a capital "G" means "Ultimate Reality". So you are wrong to say that accepting God is to reject Ultimate Reality.

And you don't understand my religion. If I explained it to you, you would call me a liar because you prefer to believe what you think you already know.

You want me to prove something when you refuse to accept what it is being proven. This is not rational.

Also, you presume to understand my faith when you are very much in the dark about it. This is not reasonable.

You are creating this false dichotomy of the bible and science. You are accusing me of being closed minded simply because you refuse to accept what I believe as valid and it frustrates you.

You don't understand my faith, but you are not really open to understanding it because you have already dismissed it.

You don't know what we believe, which is why you are pointing to the bible as if we took it as a scientific manual to begin with.

Yes I do and you concede that science is better at making observations than the Bible?

You sre simply assuming what we believe, and you do not really know. If I told you, you wouldn't believe me, because it doesn't conform to your current understanding.

My religion is not anti-science. I have always loved science. Even before I ever became a Christian. You are making a false dichotomy.

You can be condescending and pretentious about this issue all you want, but in pointing the finger at me and calling me close minded, you have 3 pointing right back at you.

You don't know what the bible is to us. Your argument is foundationally inept.

It sounds like you are close minded to understanding what we believe, so you calling me close minded is simply you projecting yourself on to me.

We certainly have a discipline, a discipline that would even give more competence to a scientist. That discipline is the purifying of the nous. A scientist with a clean intellect is going to be a more effective scientist.