Imperialism has nothing to do with refugees or islamaphobia,
How do Islamaphobia and refugees have anything to do with the root cause of Islamic terror? Islamic terror began in majority-Muslim countries long before it began to inspire acts of violence in the West. Let's not conflate the past and the present.
Imperialism doesn't exist anymore and was a made up term trying to derail America,
That's false. Imperialism does not exist as it once did, but to the extent that Western countries continue to exert hegemonic influence over other countries, imperialism continues. Consider, for instance, the numerous dictators and leaders who have, throughout recent history, been propped up by and become beholden to US power. Fundamentally, that is imperialistic.
Saying that it is a "made up term" is even more laughable, when you consider the US's colonialist ambitions in Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Philippines, Guam, and Samoa, etc. The Monroe Doctrine is an excellent example of US claims to hegemony. That you see the term as an attempt to "derail America" reveals that you are dismissing imperialism on an ideological basis rather than a factual one. In other words, you are attempting to dismiss reality because it doesn't jibe with your political beliefs.
Violent Islamic Terrorism is PREVENTED with right wing policies,
I can agree that many of the policies used to prosecute the war on terror--such as the PATRIOT Act--are right-wing policies. That, by no means, either (a) confirms the efficacy of those policies or (b) refutes the reality that right-wing policies created the problem in the first place.
ISIS arose from Obama but stopped with Trump
This is a red-herring and a shifting of the goal posts. ISIS arose out of a larger background of Islamic extremism which was itself caused by right-wing policies. I think Obama did not do enough to stem ISIS's rise, but even if Obama were the precipitating cause, the culture of extremism which made the rise of ISIS possible in the first place is due to right-wing policies. I should add, as an FYI, ISIS was effectively dead before Trump took office; claiming that Trump defeated ISIS is like saying Pompei defeated Spartacus--it's dead wrong.
islamic terrorism is in the Quran
This is a tired argument that has been made before. It is wrong, largely because no major Abrahamic religious is free of exhortations to commit violence in the name of the faith. The text is not the cause of the violence, but more so a post-hoc attempt by the perpetrators to give the violence ideological meaning.
If your talking about the mujahadeen, when Reagan trained, sure but was it really right-wing? All presidents hated communism,no matter what ideology
Yes, that's one example. And yes, most Presidents engaged in imperialistic, anti-communist policies. But, and hopefully this is not a revelation to you, left-wing presidents can engage in right-wing policies. It is not the person who implements the policy which makes the policy left or right, but the traits of the policy itself. So, the imperialism in that case was a cause of terrorism, and that imperialism was a right-wing policy irrespective of which president carried it out.
