-->
@YeshuaRedeemed
Divorce is also a sin. How do you object to a gay wedding but not to a divorcee wedding?...it's not hate to disagree with something the Bible calls a sin.
Divorce is also a sin. How do you object to a gay wedding but not to a divorcee wedding?...it's not hate to disagree with something the Bible calls a sin.
Out of curiosity, why is cash of significance to you?
How do you object to a gay wedding but not to a divorcee wedding?
I disagree. Would you say the same if Muslims are in charge, or is your issue with Christians?
How do you object to a gay wedding but not to a divorcee wedding?can atheist object to gay weddings or are they somehow prohibited from doing so?
Let's not conflate personal and professional standards here.I am frequently objecting to divorce. Next question, please. I would rather die alone than ever go through a divorce.
Text is useful as a common basis, a testament or a proof, or a check on reason. The Bible is not an instruction manual.
Text is useful as a common basis, a testament or a proof, or a check on reason. The Bible is not an instruction manual.Is your argument that people should be able to claim religious objections that are made up on the spot? If not how should we determine if a religious objection is legitimate without a specific corresponding religious text?
Is your argument that people should be able to claim religious objections that are made up on the spot?
If not and there is no way to separate legitimate religious objections from false/made up ones then how do you suggest we determine which objections should be protected?
The following is a conditional statement.(IFF) you claim your objection is based on your religion (THEN) you need to present the specific text.
does the muslim religion have specific texts, I honestly don't know but I assume they do since they toss gays off of buildings etc they must, which I gather you'd give them a pass
The issue is not forcing someone to do something that they would under normal circumstances refuse to do it is in insuring equality which sadly often requires legal action.
Since "Motorcycle Club" is not a protected class, this would seem perfectly reasonable.