-->
@Stephen
Consider the above an aside!
Raza Rumi has actually titled his piece:
The Prospects For Reform in Islam.
He says; in bold:“Muslims do in fact have a substantial body of both historical as well as contemporary thinking that they can draw upon to help improve their political and social structures and create more just, inclusive societies”.But Rumi - underlined - fails to tell us why it is that they do not "draw upon" this historical & contemporary literature & knowledge? . Could it be that the so called “islamists’ are following the Quran to the letter and simply refuse to “draw upon” anything that appears to contradict the Islamic book and Hadith? Or Simply because they believe, as he says “the view propagated by Islamists of all varieties is that Sharia law is “divinely ordained” ?He goes on to say islam/Shariah" cannot be questioned. Sharia, therefore, must be understood literally, and Islamists are driven by their belief that the Sharia represents a comprehensive political and belief system".
Salafists and Wahhabists take precisely the position you state. But the parallel is that is like saying fundamentalism is the only valid form of Christianity. Ask a Christian fundamentalist and they would say their way and only their way was the correct one. lucky for us, funamentalism is not as dominant in Christendom as Salafism is in the Muslim world. Non fundamentalist,progressive forms of islam exist. What we need is to encourage the islamic equivalent of Anglicanism!