Steven Crowder showing his true self

you made O.P. and topic neither of which had anything to do with his change my mind videos, in fact you specifically gave time points of a video which is very specific and again had nothing and no mention of the change my mind videos.

So you've gone from be offended by a sexist joke he made and wanted everyone to watch to now bring up his change my mind which he has done on many different topics.  Pivot, change direction from the original post/topic of his sexist joke (a specific thing) to a general vague criticism/attack on his various change my mind videos.

What about the guy on Saturday night live that made fun of the congressman who lost an eye in combat?

and again you won't denounce making fun of liberal tv making fun of a veteran wounded in combat with a permanent disability.

This is what hypocrisy is, you've shown a great example of it.

To be fair, the left generally hates everyone.

Because Nobody on the right has a basket of deplorables.

You asked for my specific dislike for him.

Who was asking about what I thought about someone not relevant to the topic at hand?

The guy is far-right figure and won't denounce for a comedy skits doing what they do. People don't go on SNL for the latest breaking news they go for the comedy. Steven Crowder is a political commenter when he spends most of his time talking about the news instead of making jokes.

No you are the hypocrite and you can't even admit it when I called you out. You make excuses for Steven Crowder but not for SNL when they were making a joke. It is called the special pleading fallacy when you have different standards for different people. 

where did I ask you any such thing?

What about the guy on Saturday night live that made fun of the congressman who lost an eye in combat?

you took issue with a comedian making a sexist joke which bothered you enough to start a topic about, I wanted to know if a liberal tv show that has been on since the 70s making fun of a wounded war veteran who lost an eye and had other injuries was on par or how you felt about it since you never bothered to make a thread about that happening and you still haven't said it was horrible or denounced it in anyway after what 2 or 3 times of me bringing it up?    rather hypocritical of you.

far-right what a meaning less label, he calls himself a comedian and identifies as one,  how many political commentators post video drinking games?  which was what they were doing in that video.

People watch SNL and Crowder for the same reasons, entertainment.

I'm not making an excuse, I interpreted it as a joke given all the women, gays, trans etc he's interview in the past.  But if you want to equate what he said to making jokes about wounded, disabled vets as being the same thing, we obviously have vastly different moral compasses.

The difference between the left and the right is the basket. People on the right don't use baskets, or anything remotely resembling identity politics or intersectionality.

This is why basket of deplorables defines the culture of grouphate among the left and otherism hate. You can't simply say some people are good and some are bad. It's all or nothing.

This is also why people on the left cannot condemn the 7% radicalized Muslims in the world, or Hamas in Palestine, because they are all in one big basket according to the left, and that basket must be labeled "good"

So when someone like Trump comes along and says "some of them are good people" it's like nails on a chalkboard to a leftist used to dealing with baskets of deplorables and baskets of victims.

If you're in a political party that practices identity hate, then that's a culture I would never want to be a part of. I can disagree with individual people without creating hatebaskets.

and again you won't denounce making fun of liberal tv making fun of a veteran wounded in combat with a permanent disability.

This is what hypocrisy is, you've shown a great example of it.

Just relax and don't take 

this stuff so seriously, it will make you happier.  WSS?

You criticize Crowder for a sexist joke then I ask you to do the same to SNL for what they did but you won't because you've labeled Crowder a political commentator instead of a comedian

even a political comedian, as if being one or the other makes any difference.

You won't citizen SNL because they are a comedy even though everyone would agree what they said was far more egregious.  The selective moral outrage you show is very sad, you are blinded by your ideology.

Yes I find what SNL had said and done far more offensive than Crowder's statement, but not once did I ever say they didn't have the right to say it.

Do all leftist distort the truth and lie or just you?

I'm far right, and Steven Crowder, Candace Owens, and Ben Shapiro radicalized me. These hateful extremists are far too violent and malicious even for me; I disavow them all.

Have you heard yourself? You are crying over a joke. Grow up and stop crying for someone else. 

Crenshaw can pass laws. Steven can spread false information. One is worse than the other. Do I need to say more?

So you are for speech for consequence not for freedom of speech?

Hypocritical coming from a liar and a party which put feelings over facts. 

What happened to it's just a joke?

so says the one who started the thread LOL 

more selective moral outrage

wow, you don't think speech has consequences even if it's protected as free speech?  what planet do you live on exactly?

the Left thinks there's such a thing as hate speech because it makes people feel bad etc

you earn a quote

"KingLaddy01

I don't have time to decode your autism. Either start making sense or do not post at all." 

you'll have to ask the person who started the thread that was angered enough by a comedian to start this.

More you don't know what you are talking about. Steven Crowder doesn't directly impact laws but Crenshaw does.

Oh so you don't believe in free speech. Okay.

"You see grown ups do make jokes like that, joke as in they don't really mean what they are saying."

You have made the claim that he didn't actually mean what he said and said grown ups actually are sexist. 

what does that have to do with anything?

trying to keep up the lie still?  try harder

keep trying to twist the truth and maintain your lies.

perhaps you are not familiar with the different types and labels for humor "off color" "dark" "sarcastic" just to name a few and yes adults to say things they don't really mean as a joke to elicit a reaction or over exaggerate a point.  When you become an adult perhaps you'll understand this type of societal interaction and expression.

Focus more and keeping the b.s. in your mouth instead of spewing it on the screen.

If it is "b.s" why are you still for me to spew it on? Guess you must really like "b.s.".

It must be a conservative thing where they think everyone is a liar because they are one.

your comprehension is like grade school level, I think that's where the problem is

what I wrote was "keeping the b.s. in your mouth instead of spewing it on the screen."

you accused me of things that are not true, hence you are a liar, I didn't make you say those false accusations you did that all yourself as children often do.

Let's say you are in school sitting at your desk with all your little friends and you start yelling profanities.  While that is free speech do you think there would be consequences for doing so?  As I said there are consequences even for protected speech which does not mean I "don't believe in free speech" as you wrongfully claimed aka lied about.

that's not true, you so far are the only proven liar.  but you always have the opportunity to correct yourself.

you have yet to explain what you mean by Crowder showing his true self, what actions lead you believe he portrays himself one way but is really something else?

do try to explain if you can.

You believe in hate speech? Wow you pretty much admitted to it by saying no joking about a veteran is not allowed therefore you and other right-wingers will force the hand of a comedian to apologise. Who is for free speech again?

So you are for speech for consequence not for freedom of speech?

Oh so you don't believe in free speech. Okay. 

You have made the claim that he didn't actually mean what he said and said grown ups actually are sexist. 

Protected speech is a contradiction to free speech and if you don't understand that. You really need help.

I started to show Steven Crowder's true self. I wasn't crying about a whataboustim.

Then where are you? Centre right or far right? 

I just want to hang bankers and go back to the Latin Mass =(

lie, where did I ever, ever use the term hate speech or that joking about a veteran is not allowed?  You can't quote it because your statement is a lie.

But if you want to equate what he said to making jokes about wounded, disabled vets as being the same thing, we obviously have vastly different moral compasses.

lie, I've explained there can be consequences for speech even if it's protected by the B.O.R.s how you don't know this is mind boggling,  for further explanation raise your little hand and ask your teacher.

Yes I find what SNL had said and done far more offensive than Crowder's statement, but not once did I ever say they didn't have the right to say it.

lie, again nothing you can quote hence just another baseless lie

wow, you don't think speech has consequences even if it's protected as free speech?  what planet do you live on exactly?

You see grown ups do make jokes like that, joke as in they don't really mean what they are saying.

lie, I said grown ups (some since you'd just going to be pedantic) make or have made sexist jokes and or comments.

what I wrote was "keeping the b.s. in your mouth instead of spewing it on the screen."

if free speech isn't protected then it can't be free, speech is protected by the 1a, you are very confused.

so one joke labels him as not believing in equal rights?

ah so this is some kind of personal attack on Crowder, now it makes sense.

They are both jokes but since you consider one worse than the other. You consider it hate speech.

Another point that you consider what SNL did was hate speech. 

Do you agree with this or are you not a free speech absolutist?

My position isn't that I don't think speech has consequence but you think a joke is a joke but hypocritical when it comes to people you dislike. I'll quote and make sure you see it this time.

How is my fault that you didn't quantify how many grown-ups you meant? That fault is on you.

Who is protecting this speech and how is control somehow freedom again?

wow that's about the lamest attempt to backtrack I have ever seen, yup I never used the term hate speech just like I said, just because something is offensive or morally repugnant doesn't mean it's hate speech, because there's no such thing as hate speech, what you actually did was wrongfully assume and then made false accusations on that wrong assumption turning into and perpetuating a lie and put words in my mouth.

see previous reply, yet another distortion of the truth and another lie

no changes need to be made to the 1a is that plain enough for you now?  perhaps you should have asked that first before the lies?

that's the point of the thread YOU created LOL your attack on Crowder for a joke he made, then you split hairs by labeling him a political commentator like that is relevant.

children can often be pedantic, had I known you were a child I would have tried to be more specific and dumb it down more to avoid that.

um, seriously?  Are you not familiar with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights?  control?  wtf are you even talking about?

you labeled him a sexist, sounds like a personal attack to me.

What if he has other videos that show him not to be a sexist, what then?