Proving all (other) religions wrong.

So your saying the nature of one poorly defined term is another poorly defined term.

Somehow I'm not sure that this gives me any actionable data even if I accept it axiomatically.

Actually if you are asking me to accept a claim with no testable physical evidence then that is exactly what you are asking.

Science has different goals and methods than spirituality. For example spirituality depends on anecdotal testimony as "evidence" while science dismisses anecdotal testimony as irrelevant and unreliable. Please do not falsely conflate the two.

Just so we are clear I am not claiming that science can explain everything only that what science cannot e,plain we may have to accept as unexplainable.

That's a fair thing to say... i'm okay with unexplainable. What i'm not okay with is that they are irrelevant bc it is evidence if it truly happens. It's just not something we have a means to test for. And, i'm saying "frustrated" loosely. I'm okay with anything that comes my way and quite calm the whole time. The frustration aspect is that everyone thinks your lying bc of the people that took a turd in the subject. I'm more frustrated out the human condition... not skeptics or atheist... i mean crap, even when i hear a story i'm skeptical of it bc i know how many people lie. So i understand. 

As regard to your first paragraph, i would slightly disagree. I can't prove it to you, i agree there... but, i don't fully agree i can't make logical conclusions off my experiences. See, my experiences have spanned almost my whole life. I haven't had one in awhile, but i've also kinda drawn away from the world a bit. Taking a rest in that regard. However, i can make reasonable deductions from my experiences. 

The Vegas one alone has many implications. If you don't remember it's my healing experience. Even if the healing part didn't happen and was just coincidence, i knew up until that moment something was going to happen. If it played out as it did, we can draw some conclusions at least for my own experience. The one i've chosen goes along with all other experiences, but this one is a good example. I created myself here (or some variation of this). If so, then i knew exactly what this experience will be. Therefore, having precognition like this makes sense. Of course, we can also say B-theory of time, i'm psychic, god told me about it... etc. But, in combination with all my other experiences, the one that makes most sense is the 'creating myself here.' Bc if i'm only psychic, then other experiences don't make sense... if it's this or that, other ones don't make sense. Now, i know this is a tentative conclusion i've made and can change... but so far, it answers my entire life spans worth of experiences. 

But let's be clear... i am saying this only for myself. The problem is, i don't know anyone else's experience. And one other conclusion that would make sense is Solipsism and this is my reality. But, that ultimately also doesn't make sense either as much as that's not the case does. The thing is, multiple experiences like i've had are almost like a repeatable test science would have... so, i can kinda draw a good conclusion. But you are right in the end that it's still unexplained bc i don't know what will happen in the future, or how this can lead me somewhere else. But for myself at least... i have a good idea what works best. You can bring up alternatives if you like... i can explain why it's not that bc i've thought most of them through. This is why it's actually good most people don't experience like i have... bc it truly does become an obsession with figuring out what the heck is going on.   

Perhaps religions aren't all that different.  They are all based on the idea that events in the world are controlled by supernaural beings (ie gods)who can be influenced by performing ritual acts (religious practices).   The psychology of Roman Catholicism isn't that much different from that of a cargo cult.

You seem to be getting upset and taking this very personally so I think I will just remind you that rejection of your claims is not a personal attack on you and perhaps when you have calmed down we can try again.

 If that is you still feel it is worthwhile to have these discussions with me.

If you are not upset then neither of us is but your language did seem to be coming from a place of irritation or even anger. I don't think I have ever observed a cuss word in one of your posts before.

I have, to the best of my knowledge, been unwavering in what evidence I consider sufficient.

 If you wish to continue plying me with anecdotal testimony you are welcome to but my standard of evidence is not going to change. If you find that irritating all I can say is that this is not my goal.

Then you have to admit you are wavering in what evidence is relevant to spirituality?

In what way precisely?

aren't yet willing to observer the actual evidence available. 

Does this theory have merit?

That depends on what evidence you can provide.

 I mean it should be obvious something is going on more than peoples imaginations running wild..

My beliefs are first based on my own experiences and observation of this world, they are then reinforced/confirmed through cross examination by many sources that correlate with the nature of spirituality. One has to eventually look at how vast an arena of knowledge, information and experience spirituality really is, the numbers involved and the science behind it aren't something to just ignore...

I think I've established my point enough to observe you are biased to spirituality and religion. The standard is not the problem, it's your denial of what is being observed. You aren't yet willing to observe the actual evidence available.

Does this theory have merit?

Maybe in the Bizarro Universe.

because I have never dogged or evaded a question consciously only ever tried my best to answer topics and questions directly.

And yet each would deny that the other is a presentation of spiritual truth.

I personally think every religion that every god that ever existed is like a European colonial power and Earth is their Africa.

Lol... you really have a thing for Africa don't ya? Anyways, that was an interesting theory... but, religion is way more deep-rooted than that. You can make multiple theories. But one of the most obvious is that most people are very malleable... you can feed them anything. Promise them eternity in a place they get 72 virgins, or eternal "happiness" ... or, maybe charge them a couple thousand to see the last pages from our divine alien overlords, or even promise them their own planet... and, they'll follow. Plus, there's the whole indoctrination and believe or i'll kill you stuff too. It's deep, it's mind control. Unfortunately, at present still, people have a hard time thinking for themselves in a deeper sense. That's usually a rare quality. But even then... everything has its dogma. That's truly the hardest thing to escape... even for some deep thinkers.    

 most people are very malleable... you can feed them anything

I am not sure "malleable" is the right word it implies being forced into a belief.  

Malleable is just one element, i agree. I'm using it in the sense of "easily influenced." But i agree there is more to it than just that. Society needs to be build by someone. Either we make this a spiritual argument or just evolution based. Most people need to be this way in order to do the work needed. If the world was full of intellectuals... nothing would get done. However, this comes with pros and cons. A con being you can use these people for good or evil or just good and bad. Since i think the majority of people society gives power to aren't necessarily good... this reality is the result.

The way i look at it is kinda like an analogy... bc i do think things always balance themselves out. For instance if this was a movie, a battle between Joker and Batman... right now in our reality, it's the Joker's time. He's thriving. But eventually, he should be beat. I think social media will be the catalyst for the better people (not necessarily good since i think pure good as just as rare as pure evil), but the better people can get a hold of things and balance things out. It's just a prediction, so we'll see. 

But with social media and intelligence at our finger tips... the more detrimental beliefs will or should start cancelling out a bit. Same with bad ideas and people. Again, it all comes down to who controls the "malleable" side of the population and to what end. I mean, it's also conceivable that the Joker wins and we're just headed towards a reset, but i would say that's worst case scenario. I'm just curious how and in what form this change will happen. It all really comes down to knowledge and as the OP says, proving what is clearly "more" false than others as wrong. That's really all we can do. Bc no scientist or religious person has any clue to what this reality truly is. I mean, you can feed me plank length and infinite regress... but the way i see it, look up or into yourself... it's all infinite... that's pretty crazy. All we can do is make are best guess to what's wrong and try to fix it or grow.   

If the world was full of intellectuals... nothing would get done.