The thing is children imagine many things so to say this is out of their bounds would not be true.There really is something about making it a real part of life that is inspiring, and people only learn things the easy way if they are willing to take the initiative.
I don't see any indication of understanding such a privilege here.
There really is something about making it a real part of life that is inspiring, and people only learn things the easy way if they are willing to take the initiative.The thing is children imagine many things so to say this is out of their bounds would not be true.
I don't see any indication of understanding such a privilege here.What do you mean?
Well, that's not what I'm saying
No I am saying children have imagination therefore they do not a statue to have some sort of idea of what history was like. If they do simply see that picture in a book.Oh, are you delving into parenthood now?
Of course, everyone has an imagination but I don't understand how you intend for me to tie that in.
You are arguing from personal experience which is a bad way to argue since you are not the only person who went through what you did and all I have to show is an anecdote to show an example of my way working.I'm relating this with what happened to me. I am not arguing anything....
I am just saying that some people don't want the statues to be removed because they think it will diminish the importance of, and the interest in,.... history. I agree with that, you don't have to. But that does not make either of us an evil person.
So some of the people that were there protesting the removal of a stature were not at all white supremacists, neo nazi, or racist, as many people believe because of the media.
Trump was referring to these people when he said, "there are fine people on both sides."
You have to be pretty dense to believe that Trump said White supremacists are fine people.
But, many do because they have been trained to trust the falsehoods of the media.
“You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists,”Have you ever observed these words in your life?
Post 221?I was curious after reading post 221, as to the significance.
I used ctrl-f to find where I said that here but I didn't.Edited
“You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists,”
Yeah, I'm asking if you've seen or heard them before
Yeah, I'm asking if you've seen or heard them beforeI am thinking Trump must have said it but all his st*pid comments are blocking my memory from his reasonable ones.
At least we agree that they were "stupid comments". It is not out of context when they show what happened before and after when he said that ridiculous line. I don't want to through and waste my time with an entire Donald Trump speech. That very speech I was listening for 1 minutes and found 4 errors in what he was saying.And many of the stupid comments were/are taken out of context just like the example we are talking about.
Either way, monuments do insight interest, that is one reason they are there, books are here to back up that interest. I'm not going to argue that point further, it is just common sense, which the country (and the world) seems to be losing a lot of these days.
I didn't have to look it up to know that it is ridiculous to think our president would say that, that is the difference between the real world and believing an opinion news anchor who gets paid to try and persuade you one way or another. Then they pick on each other for spreading falsehoods, I don't have time for that BS.
C'mon man, think.
This happens just as much on Fox News and other media outlets you mentioned, just on the other spectrum. When a senator, or someone in high office is claimed to say something ridiculous, it is usually not true, or completely taken out of context.
So do you support Trump?That, I can relate to. Thanks for the laugh
Yes my argument is that A is better than B so B can be destroyed since we have A.Your argument is books exist, therefore we should get rid of statues and monuments. It's the same thing you are accusing me of.
I will read the argument written by linate in another post. I'm done trying to convince you that monuments build interest for young people in history.
Yes and I doubt most people are not capable of that.Looking at the cover of a book requires you to go to a library and see it.
A monument is out for everyone to see, even if you are not looking for it, you drive past it and it can build interest unexpectedly, then you go searching for a good book.
And I don't think the internet is a good option either, anyone can write whatever they want on the internet, but a book needs to get published.
The chances that the book is more accurate than anything on the internet is greater.
It may not be the best example because it is named after her for doing good, but it was still provocative, just like the monuments and statues are.
Oh come on. Is this what you have resorted to when you can't actually rebut my claims? Petty insults? It is real shame that I dedicated time to telling you how wrong you are only for you to throw it in my face without learning from your mistakes.i can tell by your arguments, statements, grammar, examples, beliefs, and the way that you write, that you have not achieved maturity yet.
You don't understand what I am talking about,
and won't understand until you have gained more experience, maturity, and understanding of reality.
We can have this conversation again when you have reached at least 35 years of age, when you have finished school, found a career, bought a house, and support a family. At that point we will be on the same page, and we can continue.
