-->
@dustryder
look up pee tape.
OK so Muller turned in his report with no new indictments so this means Trump has been vindicated.
Approximately what percentage of Americans are estimated to despise the truth, and what fraction of those are considered "Trumpanzees"?
I'm not familiar with the term. Is it a reference to the Trump family?
Okay I'll give this a shot. Trumpanzee: An American who either does not regret voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 election, or would vote for Trump in the 2020 election. Thanks
Typical Trumpanzee talking falsehood fictions --pathological ? narcissist--- to keep their ego inflated with insignificant hot air.ol, how does it feel to be a member of a failed coup?
What was he supposed to say? He has a 400 page report that speaks for him. Shame Trump wants to vet it before it gets to the public. If Trump does not publish it I think it would not be a good idea. He could easily win the election if he relies on the Democrats using that against him. Since Republicans supporters don't even care about that it would take away from democract position like free health-care and free college.Response to a non response? Mueller has been completely silent. No collusion.
Well, discounting Mueller's rebuke on Buzzfeed fake news. Mueller has been completely silent.
mostly centering on Flynn, Cohen, and others who had process crimes against the FBI and the IRS.
Yeah there's stuff that was caught by Mueller, but there was no collusion. There was never any collusion.
continued silence from Mueller and his team about collusion.
You have to either believe they found nothing, or that they did not WANT to find anything.
Did you vote for him?Trump was never that smart to pull that off.
It probably should have been longer considering he had 500 witnesses and any one of those indictments needed to be fully explained from creation to conclusion.I doubt it takes 400 pages to talk about Comey and Cohen, FBI and the IRS.
Fox news is biased. What is your point?It's also very interesting to see the effects of completely biased Media outlets like MSNBC and Pakman over the last decade.
Whatever chaotic ripples Bernie Sanders threw into the DNC in 2016 will pale in comparison to the bombs AOC and Ilhan Omar and others of the fringe will be throwing at the establishment candidate.
Because the biased media was unable to critique Sanders on his policies, they will also be completely unable to critique and reign in the growing radical left of the democrat party.
and look very appealing to their base while seeming uninformed and out of touch to the independent voter.
and that won't translate to a 2020 win for Democrats.
I voted for him as the only choice against Hillary.
Not completely. There's far less documented fake news coming out of Fox to cover for political elites than Pakman and MSNBC.Fox news is biased. What is your point?
Any rational person would know an experienced politician is better than a businessman in charge of the White House.
It probably should have been longer considering he had 500 witnesses and any one of those indictments needed to be fully explained from creation to conclusion.
Not completely. There's far less documented fake news coming out of Fox to cover for political elites than Pakman and MSNBC.
If that was true, then the economy should have done way better than it did from 2008-2016.What looks good on paper doesn't actually translate to real world results.