Truth and facts do not change because their repeated.
Did you mean, "Truth and facts do not change because they are repeated?"
If that is what you mean, I agree, so what is your point?
Read my lips/text again. Umpteen times Ive stated yes, fetus/baby is human and of course it is alive. Ive never ever stated otherwise.
If it is human and it is alive why are you treating it as less human because you are not willing to give it basic rights - the right to life?
You keep dehumanizing and discriminating against the unborn and treating it with less worth than you give the woman.
#313--You are okay with killing them (condoning murdering another human being).
Read my lips/text:I'm ok with pregnant woman deciding what she does with a non-breathing human being that,
1} is inside her as a non-independent/individual human fetus/baby,
Why should one human being have the right to kill another human being just because it is dependent on them? The newborn is dependent on her too. Should she be able to kill it too?
2} is an organism of that woman via her body inherenlty directing all nutritional sustinence to that non-breathing, non-independent/individual, non-breating human fetus/baby,
Non-breathing does not make it less human. You keep setting up this artificial distinction. If you want to find a way of killing one class of human beings on the preference of a few, why should we not be able to do it with others, like your class, for instance?
3} non-independent/individual, human fetus/baby, that, exists in many/multiple and rapid transistional phases that have not yet lead to,
....3a} not being born-out,
.....3b} not taken its first IN-spiration of oxygen,
So what makes it any less human than you? You want to deny the most defenseless of all the right to life on the whim of another.
So, why not apply that standard to yourself?
1} I asked you to behave as a rational, logical common sense adult, and you keep refusing to do so ergo I cannot repeatedly keep this line immature, irrational illogical lack of common sense with youas the info I give you;
If you want to make a distinction on killing helpless human beings who cannot as yet defend themselves why can't we make similar distinctions with you? There are four basic differences between you and the unborn - 1. Your size, 2. Your level of development, 3. Your environment, 4. You level of dependency. None of these make you any less human than the unborn. Try arguing that they do. Should I be able to kill you like you give the woman the right to kill her unborn just because of one of these differences? Should I be able to decide whether you live or die based on the fact that I'm taller or bigger than you, or that you are less developed in one area than I am, so, therefore, I can kill you? It makes no sense, yet you are doing this with the unborn.
....1a} It goes in one ear and gets lost in a black hole, or,
.....1b} goes out the other ear with no reading compreehension along the way through.
I would charge the same with you.
Are you okay with those who make laws and legislate the unborns death determining you are unfit to live because the elite does not see you are as advanced in some manner as they are?
I'm ok with mature adults who use rational, logical common sense and exhibit moral integrity. This is not you or any radical religious etremist and/or Trumpanzee.
So, you discriminate on the less mature, like children and babies and the unborn who are not as mature then?
I have not used religious arguments for the most part. You just charge this to avoid the question at hand - why should we treat one human being different than another and if we pick one class how do you justify not picking another class of humans?
If you recognize they are alive and they are human beings (I believe I could find many posts that you argue against them being such
BS and you have not nor will you ever find such posts by me.
You have dehumanized them many times based on them not breathing as yet. Because of this, you deem it justified to kill them.
Do not speak to me about moral integrity until you examine your own position.
Do not speak to me about moral integrity until you stop virutal rape{?} of all prenant woman by sticking your immoral nose *v* into their bodily business. Do you understand that? No? I didnt think so. Take a hike. I cannot repeatedly keep responding to your lack of moral integrity, immature irrational, illogical lack of common sense.
In most cases, the woman agreed to sex and did not like the consequences because she did not take adequate precautions.
Where do you get your morality from? Discuss that.
