I'm afraid we're entering onto stagflation, with no way out

Author: n8nrgim

Posts

Hot
Total: 47
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,177
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
Which is economic stagnation plus inflation. Reckless tariffs causes both, they dampen economic activity and cause things to become more expensive.

Raising or lowering interest rates, neither r a good option. If economy is bad, raising them is bad. If inflation is bad, lowering them is bad.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
Tariffs do not cause inflation.

One and only one thing causes inflation: An increase in the money supply.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@n8nrgim
US imports are like 10% of economy. So yes, 10% of products will be slightly more expensive, and due to counter tariffs, US buisnesses might sell more locally, so dont expect any too big change in prices. There will only be more space for US buisnesses to compete in USA.
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,177
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Looks like you have your libertarian blinders on and r only worrying about things that libertarians typically worry about. Anything that increases or limits supply and demand will cause the effects I'm talking about. Inflation and stimulating economy is the whole point. To Make businesses in the usa have more demand. I don't know a single economist who would say tariffs don't cause inflation. Can you find a single credible source that backs up your claim? 
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,871
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
US imports are like 10% of economy. So yes, 10% of products will be slightly more expensive, and due to counter tariffs, US buisnesses might sell more locally, so dont expect any too big change in prices. There will only be more space for US buisnesses to compete in USA.
The United States is the largest goods importer in the world. U.S. goods imports from the world totaled $3.2 trillion in 2022, up 14.6 percent ($413.7 billion) from 2021. China was the top supplier of goods to the United States, accounting for 16.5 percent of total goods imports. The top five suppliers of U.S. goods imports in 2022 were: China ($536.3 billion), Mexico ($454.8 billion), Canada ($436.6 billion), Japan ($148.1 billion), and Germany ($146.6 billion). U.S. goods imports from the European Union 27 were $553.3 billion.


n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,177
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
As of my last knowledge update in October 2023, imports accounted for about 15% to 20% of the U.S. GDP. This percentage can fluctuate based on various factors, including trade policies, global economic conditions, and changes in consumer demand.

For the most accurate and current statistics, I recommend checking sources like the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) or the U.S. Census Bureau, which provide up-to-date trade data.
It's not just a direct effect on our economy. Even shaking consumer and business confidence can cause these things. Plus our export market will be out of whack. Trade wars r a double edge sword

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,871
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@n8nrgim
It's not just a direct effect on our economy. Even shaking consumer and business confidence can cause these things. Plus our export market will be out of whack. Trade wars r a double edge sword
Even Trump Media and Trump meme coins have dropped in value.

TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@n8nrgim
As of my last knowledge update in October 2023, imports accounted for about 15% to 20% of the U.S. GDP
Really?

3 trillion import, 30 trillion GDP = 10% of GDP is import.

Even if you pushed it to 15% somehow, it wouldnt amount to much.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@n8nrgim
Looks like you have your libertarian blinders on
It's called logic and evidence actually.

What is the evidence of the meaning of a word? A dictionary.

Page 749 (748 in epub index)


I don't know a single economist who would say tariffs don't cause inflation
Then you don't know any economists at all.


Can you find a single credible source that backs up your claim?
See above.

n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,177
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I'm not gonna watch a whole video to narrow down what maybe your point is. It looks like you just don't want to call prices going up as inflation? What you call it is irrelevant so your point is irrelevant. Tariffs cause prices to go up, bottom line. As a libertarian yourself, you should be supporting my defense of the free market
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
As of my last knowledge update in October 2023, imports accounted for about 15% to 20% of the U.S. GDP
Really?

3 trillion import, 30 trillion GDP = 10% of GDP is import.

Even if you pushed it to 15% somehow, it wouldnt amount to much.
Keynesian conceptual sophistry.

Ask how it is that something call "product" includes consumption in its sum?

If a petty chief sits in a house built by slaves eating the food of ten men, is his GDP the same as the product of ten men?


He has produced nothing, his ability to steal is not production.

No portion of the production of the united states comes from government spending or imports. Exports are production.

When a nation's (or company's, or household's) imports exceed its exports it's either going into debt, stealing, or benefiting from charity.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I am just saying, US doesnt really depend on import much, and tariffs arent going to cause any great rise in prices. They are just going to reduce trade deficit, and pretty much every economist agrees that trade deficit should be reduced.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@n8nrgim
It looks like you just don't want to call prices going up as inflation?
I will continue to reject and call out subversive redefinition.

Woman = state of mind : rejected

Inflation = prices going up for any reason : rejected

Terrorism = violence for political motivations : rejected

Socialism = liberalism, progressivism, etc... : rejected


What you call it is irrelevant
Attempting to erase the concept or hide the historical associations by redefinition is very relevant.


Tariffs cause prices to go up
That is possible, but I won't be taking seriously the alarmism of people who have no trouble with sales taxes, income taxes, corporate taxes, wealth taxes, property taxes about the danger of what is by definition a specialized tax on the buying power of the average man.

Where was this insight for the last 100 years?

A free market is self-balancing. Trade deficits are by their nature unstable, a persistent trade deficit is smoke that only comes from one fire: government interference.

I see these tariffs no differently than I see covid stimulus checks. Just another flawed action meant to bandaid a system failing due to flawed concepts. I would weap a river and find a tiny violin if it was something new.


As a libertarian yourself, you should be supporting my defense of the free market
As a rational human being my first duty is to the truth.

I like liberty, but if you said that praying to Jesus destroyed liberty because you have redefined religion as tyranny, I would object.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
tariffs arent going to cause any great rise in prices.
If they stay around for more than two months (that is the typical lead time for ordering from east Asia), they most certainly will.

and if they stay around for four years while the north American economy remains shackled and suppressed by endless regulation, taxation, and inflation; then we will certainly suffer.

The large majority of imported items (and there are many) no longer have local competition. They aren't services that we can just start doing, nor are they things small run industrial shops can produce efficiently.

This is a sink or swim strategy, and it would be insane if not for a simple fact: The public are idiots. If something doesn't happen in four years, then it won't happen at all because the pendulum will swing and they'll elect a new batch of idiots who will undo everything.

The only way to change policy in the USA is to do something so radical that it sabotages any attempt at reversion.

That is EXACTLY how the left-tribe has consistently made progress over the last century.

The ratchet strategy.

The ratchet here is simple: Nobody is going to trust a business model which is based on exporting to the USA if this lasts for more than a month. Nor should they.

After they stop obsessing over selling to us, we'll have to start building things ourselves even if the left-tribe retakes control.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
The large majority of imported items (and there are many) no longer have local competition
Thats not really true. Many products are in competition with not just products of same type, but with different products which serve similar purpose. For example, almost any food item is in competition with most other food items, even if different. Besides, Trump isnt banning import. He is just encouraging US citizens to prefer local buisnesses which will now be forced to rise out of necessity and given space. Some buisnesses will even produce more due to new available market opening in USA.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Thats not really true. Many products are in competition with not just products of same type, but with different products which serve similar purpose.
I'll give you an example. Miniature skid steers.


USA made: $80,000 no bells and whistles

China made: $12,000 base, $15,000 all bells and whistles, $25k after import


An 80k machine is not a drop in for a 25k machine. It doesn't matter if it can do the same thing, people can't afford it. Combine it with all the illegal leaving and there won't be a low wage workforce to do things without a machine.

That means light earth works companies shut down.

They can't raise their prices by 200% to afford american machines and american labor.

That's facing all our sins at one time, and whether that's better than easing into it I don't know.


Of course we can be a prosperous society, we can adapt, but that would require that all the government theft stop, it would require that the government stop ruining schools and universities, it would require that the government stop making rules so complicated and inconsistently enforced that sometimes you can't even pay a lawyer to figure out if doing something harmless and productive is legal (and you couldn't afford the rates if there was a willing lawyer).


Again, my point is that the things which created the trade imbalance are poisons in our own body. These tariffs create a quarantine, but if you're already sick it doesn't help.

What this is doing is making it life or death, and the problem is that for Trump changing the tariffs is infinitely easier (politically) than stopping the mass theft and regulation.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Also, US trade deficit with China is 300 billions. Thats 3 trillion dollars going to China every 10 years, and we know China isnt exactly an ally of USA.

I like People's Republic of China!
🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

Do you?
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I'll give you an example. Miniature skid steers.
USA made: $80,000 no bells and whistles
China made: $12,000 base, $15,000 all bells and whistles, $25k after import
25% tariffs aint gonna push that price to 80,000.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
No, but it will push the chinese import out of range, and companies will fail. Again just a specific example. Far from the only case.

This is not just temu fashion in question

Bulk industrial tools and resources
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,804
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Tariffs do not cause inflation.
If you define inflation as an increase in prices, tariffs can cause inflation.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
No, but it will push the chinese import out of range
It wont. The Chinese will just sell at higher price in USA until some competitor appears to replace them.

Again, USA cannot afford losing trillions out of its economy every year, and US buisnesses cannot ever compete with things like Chinese slave labor workforce. Their people work at much lower wage for  much more time, while their buisnesses are being granted money from government and have barely any regulations. You cant compete with such shithole without becoming shithole yourself, or just use tariffs and make shithole pay for being a shithole.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Savant
Tariffs do not cause inflation.
If you define inflation as an increase in prices, tariffs can cause inflation.
If you define a woman as anyone who identifies as a woman then ketanji brown jackson isn't a biologist.


TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
But there are many shitty things USA imports from China.

In 2023, smartphones, computers, lithium-ion batteries, toys, and video game consoles accounted for 27% of U.S. goods imports from China.

Yeah.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
No, but it will push the chinese import out of range
It wont. The Chinese will just sell at higher price in USA until some competitor appears to replace them.
They can't because there would be no buyers.

That's the problem.

If American companies could afford to buy American and simply choose not to for profit motive, then tariffs could alter behavior.

However if they are on a business model that cannot drastically increase prices and they cannot afford American made, then they don't buy Chinese or American, they go out of business.

This is also the fallacy of the minimum wage increases, the assumption that there is a large profit margin that the government can redirect in its infinite wisdom to the politicians constituents. i.e. you increase minimum wage and nobody gets fired. That is an incredibly baseless assumption.


It's a big economy, you'll find specific examples of everything, but in general the companies that we need the most have thin margins. You increase minimum wage and they will fire or go out of business. You take away the cheap east Asian imports and their business model no longer works at all.



ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
lithium-ion batteries
That is not nothing, and it is the perfect example to further make my point.

US government decides carbon dioxide is going to make the ocean boil, introduces all sorts of taxes and regulations making it ever more impossible to use combustion (especially diesel), while making it advantegous to use an EV.

All in the context of not mining our own lithium but getting it from China.

Now EVs work, bad reasons aside.

ICEs work.

However if you cut off the battery imports, and you don't remove the shit you did to ruin ICE appeal and production; then you don't have any vehicles and you are very screwed.

That is a highly representative example of the whole situation.

We can survive, but not without an explosive restoration of economic liberty. One that will be politically very difficult to deliver. One I am not confident Trump is even aware is necessary.

I fear he thinks he's just done the hard part, and if that is the case; we are going to go into a chaotic depression and not recover. This will be used as proof Trump and "capitalism" (economic liberty) were wrong. "late stage capitalism", the USA will fully embrace socialism, and then it will end up like all the other American nations that have tried socialism (poor as fuck, possibly hyper inflated, dominated by a black market run by organized crime)

TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
China is ready to go in great debt just to fund its buisnesses so they can send cheap products to USA and destroy local buisnesses in USA and make US economy depend on China. Maybe US products arent cheapest, but they should be chosen when the alternative is to go in trade deficit and constantly lose money. If US was imagined like a buisness, currently it would be a buisness which loses twice more money than it earns, and that means US either has to print more money or go in debt to make up for lost money. Its not good, and tariffs are the only realistic solution.

They can't because there would be no buyers
Companies will still buy Chinese necessary products at slightly higher price, and increase their own prices to make up for the difference. Its that simple. Also, the reason why there are no competitors right now to Chinese goods is because Chinese goods are too cheap to be competed with. Almost no one opens a buisness knowing it cant possibly compete with what China brings.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 254
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
We can survive, but not without an explosive restoration of economic liberty
Trump also promised lower taxes, less government spending and less regulations, so I think its going to work out.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 7,585
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@n8nrgim
Venezuela has already discussed dropping their tarrifs so we can drop ours. It appears the strategy is working.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,804
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
"An increase in prices" is the most common definition of inflation (and pretty much the only one that I can find). Here are the first five results when I google "what is inflation?"

ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,392
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Savant