-->
@Dr.Franklin
Yes he has, see General relativity or gravitons? | Ro's blog
Gravity Is Not a Monopole Phenomena
Posts
Total:
49
-->
@FLRW
We all know he cant type normally
The short answer is because there is no observational or experimental reason whatsoever to believe in the existence of monopoles.
They exist as purely theoretical mathematics, and I'm pretty sure the theory began when a group of mathematicians got really high and said "wouldn't it be cool if..."
That, plus they aren't even possible theoretically. The existence of magnetic monopoles would fundamentally violate our physical theories of electromagnetism, and electromagnetism is kind of a big deal in physics, you know, foundational to the unity of a vast amount of interrelated scientific disciplines, and all that.
If you really want to try to unravel the world ofscience, you probably need to be armed with a little more than absolutely nothing in the way of observational or experimental reasons to do so.
-->
@zedvictor4
@FLRW
@Sidewalker
FLRW..Yes he has, see General relativity or gravitons? | Ro's blog
Ha, thanks for your confidence in me FL.
However, I think I made two math accounting errors for the simplest tube as graviton-darkEon to exist.
The total 15 LoR's is correct via Fullers given formula 6^2 = 36, minus 6 = 30, divided by 2 = 15.
However, total 15LoR's, minus 9 surface LoR's, --not my mistaken 6-- leaves 6 internal loR's, not my stated 12. Duhh! :--( )--:
So once again, the following Two line, 2D matrice pattern = 6 events { non-nucleated triangles on each end } > 9 surface LoR's > 12 crossing internal LoR's with total of 15 LoR's. And of course we have to imagine trajectories connecting all of these. Sorry, still no graphics from ebuc. :--((
…1……3p...…................................................5…... has three surface LoR's
-
…….......................................................................... no nucleated nodal events = no internal occupied space body to any proposed graviton-darkEon
-
……2p..…..................................................4…….6.. has three surface LoR's
Terminal end triangle opening 1..2p...3p……………………………..4….5p...6 Terminal end triangle opening
My choice is course for the minimal quantum pulse of Universe is the Four line pattern, that,
> 13 nodal/vertexial events >
> 3 nucleations to the 3 triangles >
> 1 free radical/fluctuating virtual agent { 9th nodal event } nucleus event inside the tube >
> 15 surface LoR's >
> 63 crossing internal LoR's, with a total of 78 LoR's
And remmember, if we were to not have the 9th nodal event, the total LoR's would be 66, instead of 78. I find that interesting because of my other considerations of Cosmic Pi-Time 66.4.......
So I wanted to point out one other thing in regards to the four line pattern with the nucleated set as body of the graviton-darKeon, and that is in regards to any holographic ideas I would love to assign it.
And that is, most complex humans have 64 codons { genetic triplets } and if take the 63 crossing internal LoR's plus the internal 9th nodal event, we do arrive at resultant of 64. Yes, I realize this mixing apples and oranges, however, we have to consider, those internal 64 can perhaps be more likened to a Quantum Field set of vibrations/fluctuations, within the graviton-darkEon, than the nucleated end triangles that are surface, the mid-girth triangle --tho nucleated internally by 6, it appears as less of a free radical agent than 9th nodal event--- and the other end nucleated triangle is also part of the surface set.
I guess what I feel is signiricant is that the vibrating field { Quantum Field Theory } creates scenario, where there exist no truly non-occupied space within the surface or internal body of the gravition-darkEon. So read my lips carefully there. Im trying to invoke some way of clarifying that no truly non-occupied space exists within Universe even at the most planck-like scales of existence, that, is the graviton-darkEon.
..1...........5p..7p.........11p....13p............17p...loops to meet itself in circle, tho not shared location 17p / 1
-
0...............6...................12.......................18.loops to meet itself in a circle as 18/0, only shared location
.......3p.................9......................15.............loops to meet itself in circle, tho not shared location 3p / 15
-
....2p...4............8....10..............14....16..........loops to meet itself, tho not shared location 2p/16
-->
@ebuc
Ha, thanks for your confidence in me.
I think I was agreeing with you, but you just say it differently, like real extremely differently.
Ha, thanks for your confidence in me.I think I was agreeing with you, but you just say it differently, like real extremely differently.
You have to read his lips not what he is writing.
So read my lips carefully there. Im trying to invoke some way of clarifying that no truly non-occupied space exists within Universe even at the most planck-like scales of existence, that, is the graviton-darkEon.
-->
@Sidewalker
SD...I think I was agreeing with you, but you just say it differently, like real extremely differently.
I agree totally SD. You and I are on same page regarding gravity not having a mono-pole particle.
I was mainly addressing FLRW with the Ha, thanks for you confidence FL comment. Sorry for confusion
I was mainly addressing FLRW with the Ha, thanks for you confidence FL comment. Sorry for confusion
-->
@ebuc
I agree totally SD. You and I are on same page regarding gravity not having a mono-pole particle.I was mainly addressing FLRW with the Ha, thanks for you confidence FL comment. Sorry for confusion
So even reading your lips should not have helped?
……2p..…..................................................4…….6.. has three surface LoR's
I could have chosen any one of these fragments; this one will do the job. Most of us, boyo, [I mean ebuc, but he has blocked me] are not advanced mathematicians, so frankly don't know if this is legit, or bullshyte. Either way, it is excessive premature efactulation, and evidence of singular track mind. Have any other subjects needing clean-up after the exercise? After years of this, it's a little boring.
-->
@fauxlaw
……2p..…..................................................4…….6.. has three surface LoR'sI could have chosen any one of these fragments; this one will do the job. Most of us, boyo, [I mean ebuc, but he has blocked me] are not advanced mathematicians, so frankly don't know if this is legit, or bullshyte. Either way, it is excessive premature efactulation, and evidence of singular track mind. Have any other subjects needing clean-up after the exercise? After years of this, it's a little boring.
Take it to AI to deal with his limitations.
-->
@Shila
Take it to AI to deal with his limitations.
I don't deal with AI, at all. It is, after all, artificial. What's so great about that?
-->
@fauxlaw
Take it to AI to deal with his limitations.I don't deal with AI, at all. It is, after all, artificial. What's so great about that?
America is spending trillions on AI. It’s the wave of the future.
-->
@Shila
on. AI, the wave may end up being a tsunami. Like I said, being associated with artificiality is not my cup of tea. This ought to be cautious territory, and many experts in the field agree. Many others do not...
Fauxlaw states i message #39....[I mean ebuc, but he has blocked me]
Thats false. If I have ever had him blocked, I undid block months ago and have since stated many times that he still has me blocked. He said he would unblock when he figured out how to do it.
As for this apparrent quote{?} ……2p..…..................................................4…….6.. has three surface LoR's
I dont know that is the case, and he does not address it specifically with any logical, common sense critical thinking, or ask what it means.
Ive been very clear for the most part --grammar or mis-speak does occur--- and I will do so here since faux is clueless --old news--- yet think his clueless oppinions are of significance to validating or invalidating what I express.
1..2p....4 define a triangular surface relationship and 6 { inside-the-tube } is the nuclear to that triangle.
1..2p....4 define a triangular surface relationship and 6 { inside-the-tube } is the nuclear to that triangle.
That is what the true statement should read, and I think ive gotten correct in some messsage around here if not others.
Fauxlaw has no interest in my ideas ergo, they should ignore. Simple.
Fauxlaw has no interest in my ideas ergo, they should ignore. Simple.
And yes, several month later he still has me blocked. There is three nucleated, surface triangles in the dual-invaginted di-pyramid,
Two end nucleated triangles where nucleus is on surface, and the mid-girth triangle where #6 is inside-the-tube.
Two end nucleated triangles where nucleus is on surface, and the mid-girth triangle where #6 is inside-the-tube.
Read my lips/text is best for those who have any true desire to grasp relatively easy concepts of the dual -invaginated space and time horn torus I attempt to present with clarity. Simple This link does not have the set of dual invaginations
-->
@fauxlaw
on. AI, the wave may end up being a tsunami. Like I said, being associated with artificiality is not my cup of tea. This ought to be cautious territory, and many experts in the field agree. Many others do not...
You might miss the most eventful development of a lifetime.
-->
@Shila
I have never in my life played an online video game, but I am well aware of them
Oops, I followed and error that Faux was creating not me. There exists no inside-the-tube with only two lines. Faux was citing the two line pattern.
Ive been very clear otherwise
Ive been very clear otherwise
Some here have respectful integrity for truth
The four line pattern Ive presented is clear:
1...2p...4 have the inside-the-tube 3p as nucleus ...inside-the-tube reality
5p....7p...8 has 6 as nucleus --mid-girth of the dual invaginated, truncated triangular based di-pyramid
10...1p..13p have inside-the-tube 12 as nucleus and as physical reality of observed time { quantised and quantified }
10...1p..13p have inside-the-tube 12 as nucleus and as physical reality of observed time { quantised and quantified }
Peace be upon those who seek truth and pathways of logical, common sense critical thinking based on human observation.
-->
@fauxlaw
I have never in my life played an online video game, but I am well aware of them
Never too late to start.
-->
@Shila
Nope, a decided waste of time. I was bored by Pong, released in 1972, within 30 seconds.