Gravity Is Not a Monopole Phenomena

Author: ebuc

Posts

Total: 49
Topic's author
#1
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,329
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Part 1: Pulling Inward Results in all Pushing Outward Phenomena

We have positive numbers and negatives ergo, math agrees with existence of di-polar electric and magnetic particles.

Historically it was believed that if a graviton { quantum of Gravity  } existed it would be a mono-pole.

I believe Ive discovered why attractive/contractive Gravity{ graviton } is not a monopole particle. because it is involved with the outer, positive geodesics of a torus, and its geodesic trajectory --as Gravtiational space--- leads to the inner negative geodesics of a the same torus, ergo,

expansive { outward vector }, Dark Energy geodesic space, leads back to positive geodesics of attractive/contractive { inward vector } and the Quantum Pulse as graviton-darkEon.

So why do we then observe spherical particles --ex the fuzzy electron cloud of atom--- , and not a torus?  Because the outer Gravity space geodesics and inner Dark Energy space geodesics are not quantized nor quantified by humans.

We do observe sine-waves associated with electron and other particles. The way we have spherical particle --ex the atom with its fuzzy electron cloud-- can be understood with the 2D pattern for the 3D torus via four circles on same plane.

.......outer gravity space geodesic >(    ((   )(    ))    )< outer gravity space geodesic.......

........(    ((    )< inner dark energy space geodesic >(    ))     )........ these two perspectives the  cross-section, bi-section b perspective of a torus from horizontal side view or birds-eye-view.  Following below is the 2D pattern for these four circles in more linear format, where looped circles have to be imagined.
Topic's author
#2
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,329
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Part 2
..1...........5p..7p.........11p....13p............17p...loops to meet itself in circle, tho not  shared location 17p / 1
-
0...............6...................12.......................18.loops to meet itself in a circle as 18/0, only shared location
.......3p.................9......................15.............loops to meet itself in circle, tho not shared location 3p / 15
-
....2p...4............8....10..............14....16..........loops to meet itself, tho not shared location 2p/16

More imagination is needed to imagine the longer space geodesics  from outer to inner ---ex 1 > 2p, 7p > 8, 13p > 14 etc and the  inner back outward ---ex 4 > 5p,  10 > 11p, 14 > 17p etc.

There are shorter geodesic trajectories --I label as invaginations-- that create the inside-the-tube sine-wave associated with observed { quantized and quantified } time aka physical reality or energy. The numericals  are 2p > 3p >4  as invagination,  5p > 6 >7p,  8 > 9 > 10 etc.

Since we do not the quantise/oberved the top line as outer positive geodesic of Gravitationl space, we place it aside from our above inventory, and the do the same with the bottom line, as the inner negative geodesic of Dark Energy space.

After placing aside the top and bottom lines we observe the sine-wave associated with reality { observed time } as the invaginations creating the inside-the-tube { body of reality }, 0...3p....6.....9.....12.....15....18 etc.

Topic's author
#3
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,329
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Part 3

So the sine-wave follows a circle { a vector }, and if we have two such sine-waves ---or more--, then we define a spherical. The more sine-wave circle patterns --and the higher the frequency--- the more energy of the particle of reality. And I believe it is specific orientations of the two or more sine-wave circles { as vectors }, ---and their interference frequencies--- to each other, that define specific types of particles

Here are two links to assist others with the geometric shape/pattern of a torus and positive and negative curvature.  Also, I believe the 2nd link below --the horn torus-- is what all of my proposed space-time tori is the specific pattern, because it fills the most space.

Neither of these two links show the invagination pattern Ive invoked. First link is a whole torus and 2nd is a cross-section.

#4
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@ebuc
You cant see gravity. You can only observe effects it has on things. Gravity is like magic which cannot be explained yet. We just know its there somewhere, causing things to happen. However, I have yet to see an explanation of what gravity actually is. We know that gravity is everywhere around us, but the problem rises in the fact that no one can explain why one body is capable of sending some "invisible hand" which pulls other bodies towards it. Its like there is some world out there which we cannot yet detect. It literally works like magic.
Topic's author
#5
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,329
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Part 4

Gravity { attractive/contractive/inward } is believed to create stars. The stars then push outward various frequencies of EMRadiation { photons } and other particles.The brain only sends one kind of signal to our muscles, and that is to contract. Once that signal stops, the muscle relaxes back to its rest state.
Japanese light weight hand saws, are designed to the cut on the pulling inward motions, wherease heavier western saws designed to cut on the push stroke.In olden days, we saw strong man on tv, pulling a box car of train. Sometimes with bite stick in his teeth, or maybe attached to his body in other ways than just using his hands-arms. We never saw the strong man pushing a box car.

The longer, contractive, Gravitational, space geodesic vectors go inward to become the expansive, Dark Energy space geodesic vectors go outward to become Gravity. We do not observe { quantised nor quantify } these phenomena directly, only indirectly.

..--><--- = inward, towards each other aka contractive space Gravity

...<-----> = outward away from each other aka expansive space Dark Energy

(   ) = around aka orbit etc.
The latter three are the only cosmic directions of Universe.

Further more, whereas Eiensteins general relativity math lead to null geodesic photon trajectorys  --i.e. just vanish as nothingness-- was verified by Roger Penrose in 1965 for which he won the nobel prize in 2016 for that single page proof.

However, Leonard Susskind the renowned Italian string theory dude, proved that null geodesics are the incorrect solution. Their string theory model called ADS/CFT nothing is ever lost. Yet some things appear to be trapped in black holes forever, however, black holes evaporate.

This vid with Leornard Susskind may be at time stampe 2:5o or so, Leonard states their string theory maths state nothing is ever lost, forever even in a black hole. this may not be the original vid I was thinking of, yet it should deliver the same comments I remmber from Susskind on this issue of photons not coming their end in black hole as null /incomplete null geodesics.
#6
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,847
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Best.Korea
You cant see gravity. You can only observe effects it has on things. Gravity is like magic which cannot be explained yet. We just know its there somewhere, causing things to happen. However, I have yet to see an explanation of what gravity actually is. We know that gravity is everywhere around us, but the problem rises in the fact that no one can explain why one body is capable of sending some "invisible hand" which pulls other bodies towards it. Its like there is some world out there which we cannot yet detect. It literally works like magic.

Gravity explained.

Gravity is a fundamental force of attraction between any two objects with mass or energy, causing them to pull towards each other, with stronger pulls occurring between objects with greater mass and closer proximity.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Universal Attraction:
Gravity is a universal force, meaning that every object in the universe, regardless of its size or composition, experiences a gravitational pull towards every other object.

Mass and Distance:
The strength of gravity depends on two main factors: mass and distance.
Mass: The more massive an object is, the stronger its gravitational pull.
Distance: The closer two objects are to each other, the stronger the gravitational pull between them.

Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation:
Sir Isaac Newton described gravity as a force that acts between all objects with mass, stating that the gravitational force is directly proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Einstein's Theory of General Relativity:
Albert Einstein later proposed a different view of gravity, stating that gravity is not a force but rather a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.

#7
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,457
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Shila

Well stated.
#8
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,457
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Didn't Stormy say, Trump Is Not a Monopole Phenomena?
#9
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,847
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
Didn't Stormy say, Trump Is Not a Monopole Phenomena?
Trump paid her 150k to keep silent about his handicap as a male. She did mention his mushroom head.
#10
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Shila
I hope he washed it . 

Who wants cheesy mushrooms?
#11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Who wants cheesy mushrooms?
Nasty perverted girls.

#12
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Have you contacted that hooker yet?
#13
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
I aint losing my virginity with a sell-out.
#14
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
It will be a buy-out.
#15
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
"Sell-out" is a term for person who abandons her own values and beliefs and takes different ones just to earn money. She is a sell-out.
#16
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Ah.

You just need to find a happy hooker who considers her work to be an essential social service.

A sort of sexual therapist.
#17
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
You just need to find a happy hooker who considers her work to be an essential social service.
If she does it for money, she is a sell-out.
#18
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Or a business woman.

You will find that most folk have to do things for money.

It's sort of how it works.
#19
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Sell-out means believing or doing things only because of money.

You will find that most folk have to do things for money.
They are sell-outs too. My issue here isnt that sell-outs are totally bad. I just dont want to lose my virginity to someone who is only doing it for money and doesnt even love me one bit, maybe even finds me disgusting.
#20
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Love.

An specific electro-chemical response to a specific stimulus.

But we pretend it's more than that.


#21
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
An specific electro-chemical response to a specific stimulus. But we pretend it's more than that.
Even if its just that, it still exists. I learned from "World Conquest Zvezda Plot" anime that sell-outs are bad and that it is better to die doing things you want than to live doing things you dont want.
Being a sell-out rarely pays off. Sell-outs sacrifice their own beliefs and growth to get material wealth. As a result, they have material wealth, but their "self" is lost, their dreams and knowledge are reduced, and they become mentally retarded and blind materialist consumers with no ability to even think or contain decent knowledge. They have no morality other than money, and will sacrifice others, even their children and nation, just to get money. They are sell-outs.
#22
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,457
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea

Hey, Melania has a great life.
#23
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FLRW
Hey, Melania has a great life.
Yes, but whole USA is suffering. Trump is a sell-out.
#24
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FLRW
Similar to "sell-outs" are "power-driven individuals". They sacrifice their "self" and others just to gain power, praise, fame and approval. They are as bad as sell-outs. But Trump is both a sell-out and a power-driven individual. Its great that USA has finally demonstrated what ancient thinkers told a thousand times: "Caring too much for material wealth corrupts the spirits and minds of people.".
#25
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,794
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
Gravity Is Not a Monopole Phenomena
Am I the only one who read this as "Gravity is not onomatopoeia"?
#26
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,875
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
So, how do you fund your lifestyle?
#27
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
So, how do you fund your lifestyle?
By not working much.

Topic's author
#28
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,329
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
I was'nt clear post #1, we do not see/observe { quantize nor quantify } the outer { top line of the four } Gravity (      ), and,

nor do we observe { quantzed nor quantify } the inner { bottom line of the four } Dark Energy   )(, i.e.
 
we only observe the inside-the-tube { two inside lines of the four } observed { quantized and quantified } time as physical reality.

...space (    ((     )(     ))     )space... so in this format the inside-the-tube reality is the intended-as-circles in bold.

In the 2 four line matrice pattern/formatting will only observe { quantized and quantify } the two inside-the-tube, as ever particle of Universe --except the graviton-darkEon---  the sine-wave pattern of invoked the two inside lines.

.1...........5p..7p.........11p....13p............17p...loops to meet itself in circle, tho not  shared location 17p / 1
-
0...............6...................12.......................18.loops to meet itself in a circle as 18/0, only shared location
.......3p.................9......................15..............loops to meet itself in circle, tho not shared location 3p / 15
-
....2p...4............8....10..............14....16..........loops to meet itself, tho not shared location 2p/16

The triangulated enumeration works very well for all know families of Fermionic matter i.e:
18 quarks and 18 anti-quarks,

3 aspects of electron, muon electron, tau electron and their 3 anti-particles

3 aspects of neutrinos, muon neutrino, tau neutrino and their 3 anti-particles
Then we have to consider the observed time reality of Bosonic Forces:

EMRadiation { two precessed at 90 degrees to each other } sine-wave of electric { charge ? } and magnetic { charge? }, however, photons are not consider to be charged particles. 
Weak force has three aspects W+, W- and Zo aka Z naught

The nuclear force: is exchange of two quarks between hadrons{ heavy fermionic matter } ex proton neutrons and they are labeled as mesons, and ultra-short lived particles.  No sine of three-ness there.

Strong sub-nuclear force of gluons, that hold three or two quarks together. Mathematically nine of them should exist, and for reasons always beyond my comprehension only 8 manifest themselves.  

#29
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,753
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@ebuc
I believe Ive discovered why attractive/contractive Gravity{ graviton } is not a monopole particle.
No you haven't...in fact you haven't "discovered" anything ever.
Topic's author
#30
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,329
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Part 5
Simplest geometrical pattern for a tube, with least amount of structural integrity,  is two triangular openings at each end of the tube, ---total of 6 nodal/vertexial events--   and and total of 15 lines-of-relationship { Lor's }.

The 6 nodal/vertexial events are surface only.   Of the 15 LoR's, three are surface and 12 LoR's crossing through the tube, as internal { inside-the-tube } body of the tube.

So the question arises,  why my prior presentation of 13 nodal/vertexial events with their 78 LoR's as the minimal graviton-darkEon quantum of Universe? Yes?

…1……3p...…................................................5…... has three surface LoR's
-
…….......................................................................
-
……2p..…..................................................4…….6.. has three surface LoR's

12 crossing, internal LoR's

Terminal opening 1..2p...3p……………………………..4….5p...6 Terminal opening

The questions that arise for me. Is tube without a mid-girth  triangular opening set of 3 nodal/vertexial events, truly a minimal structural integrity, as a fundamental, graviton-darkEon quantum pulse  of Universe?

Is the simplest triangular set for a tube, without any nucleated nodal/vertexial events, structurally the most ideal,  quantum pulse fundamental, that, Universe exhibit as the graviton-darkEon?  Yes?

There is no inherent sine-wave pattern of nodal events.

Is 6 nodal/vertexial sufficient to define structural integrity as tubular surface for the minimal quantum pulse of Universe?

Is 6 LoR's ufficient to define the  structural integrity surface for the minimal quantum pulse of Universe?

Part 6

Of the two versions Ive presented, which would other chose to be the most wholistic minimal set, and come closest to being likened to holographic scenario/representation, via our proposed, minimal quantum pulse, graviton-darkEon?

1} 6 events { non-nucleated } > 6 surface LoR's > 12 crossing internal LoR's with total of 15 LoR's

2} 13 events > 3 nucleated to the 3 triangles > 1 free agent nuclear event > 15 surface LoR's> 63 crossing internal LoR's, with a total of 78 LoR's?