-->
@Best.Korea
That is not the definition of faith, no matter how many times you proclaim it.If you are not going to agree on a definition, then there is no debate. Either give a definition you want to debate on, or this wont go anywhere.
Making up definitions of words just isn't necessary, they have resources for that, they are called dictionaries, check it out.
Is the rejection of science a precept of your religion?It was a comment on quantum physics. Even Einstein said that its not perfect because it doesnt have direct observation. When there is no direct observation, then there is only inductive reasoning or by results. Inductive is not perfect because its basically built on assumption that things we cannot observe are acting in same way as things we can observe. If you go by results of things you cant observe, it is like observing the effect while not seeing the cause. So while we know that cause exists and reacts to input, it is still not an observation of a cause. So without direct observation, it is very silly to assume that we can know exactly how it works. We dont even know everything about things we can directly observe. Brain can be observed given enough time, but brain has so many connections that mere amount makes it impossible to observe it effectively, let alone make complete theory from such an observation. With the things you cant observe directly or which rely on flawed observation instruments, it is even harder. Science isnt some magic which gives instantly correct answers. Most scientists spend decades working on theories, and face many failures. It is years of effort which eventually reveal a working theory out of bunch theories out there. Even theory of evolution today isnt same as it was when it was first produced.
Kim Jong-un said his archeologists found evidence of unicorns, do you think that is proof that unicorns exist.
Is that why you believe in unicorns, because Kim Jong-un's archeologists found proof?
