-->
@Best.Korea
Nobody believes that.Maybe you just dont talk to many people.
Maybe you're just not listening
Nobody believes that.Maybe you just dont talk to many people.
The people had a referendum on Jan 6 last election
They chose to side with the victims instead of the tyrants.
That 5 when you asked for 1 instance.
Maybe you're just not listening
No one thinks that. You are, as usual, inventing your own opposition because you have no rational defense of your horrid position.That's what the conclusion of your beliefs are.
So your claim is 1500 people physically beat up cops that day?
So limit the pardon to them, but he didn't. I wonder why.What did they do? Show up to a protest? There are videos of cops letting people into the capital so they went into a building that was literally unlocked for them?
I rarely listen to people in real life, because they mostly talk nonsense which I am not interested in absorbing.
Then you have no business criticizing them.
It's kind of an odd choice for someone not interested in what others have to say to spend their time on a debate site responding to people you disagree with.
we recognize that the overwhelming majority oppose pardons for the J6 convicts
So the people who beat up police officers are the victims,
to pardon people who beat up police officers for doing their jobs.
Cite one comparable example that you are prepared to stand by.
A fully aware, fully conscious decision... to pardon people who beat up police officers for doing their jobs.
This is logic 101 and you are failing it's most basic test. If you want to present a rational argument provide data or examples of individuals who were unfairly prosecuted and then we can begin to have a discussion.
Did you know that in the last 2 years you have made over 50 threads and that only 2 of those threads has nothing to do with Trump?