The words and concepts are understandable,
Though I don't know enough history or economics to have strong opinions on the subject.
"in capitalism, people are inequally rich not inequally poor," #59 befairbruh
I just take to mean argument that allowing people to freely trade, results in goods being available,
And because of competition or wanting to appeal to market, they become affordable to more customers.
Large quantity of items such as clothes, phones, TVs, blankets, furniture, enters the market,
Making for higher quality of life, than if free market did not exist, is the argument I think.
. . . Debatable point is whether we are richer because of free market, or because of technology and societal advance and accumulation over time.
But I do 'see the argument,
If only government products existed, maybe we'd see less variety of product types, or variations of certain products.