Tao - So simple, yet no one can understand it

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
What is Tao?

Least effort, maximum result.

Isnt this the ideal?

Least input, maximum output.

You would want to have a car which uses no fuel, yet can drive great distance.

You would want to spend very little money, yet earn very much.

You would want to buy at zero cost, yet sell at great price.

The military would love to have an aircraft which uses no fuel and can fly forever.

The buisness would love to reduce cost and increase output, so that it can profit more.

"Least input, maximum output" is the ideal state of things, and you are supposed to move towards it.

Whats next? What else is Tao?

Tao is constant. It does not exhaust.

What does it mean? It means Tao doesnt stop, and doesnt stop moving towards its goal.

Lets say you were driving a car, and suddenly, it ran out of fuel. It exhausted.

Your car is then not constant in reaching its destination. It exhausted.

One can avoid exhausting in three ways. By reducing input, or by increasing output, or by changing output.

Lets say that instead of traveling a long distance, you instead chose to travel shorter distance. Now your car wont exhaust and wont run out of fuel, because its input is equal to its output. Thus, by changing desired output, your car wont exhaust.

Maybe instead of this, you decided to put more fuel in your car, so it can reach its destination without exhausting. So you increased input and with it, the output, and now your car wont exhaust.

Or maybe somehow, you made your car use less fuel, so it can reach its destination without exhausting. So you reduced input per output, and thus your car wont exhaust.

This is Tao. Tao is most simple, yet not even the smartest person on Earth can understand it.

What else is Tao?

Tao does not compete, yet it defeats all competition and defeats all opponents.

"How is this possible?" - They ask.

What is the goal of competition?

The goal of competition is to eliminate all opponents.

Tao says "I dont have opponents. I have no enemies.". 

Thus, Tao: He who has no enemies, cannot be defeated by any enemy.

He who has no opponents has already eliminated all opponents. He has no opponents. He has no competition. He has defeated all competition. He destroyed all his enemies by simply ceasing to consider them enemies.

Strongest is the one who destroys all enemies.

Destroying all enemies means you have no enemies anymore.

Tao doesnt consider anyone an enemy, thus Tao has no enemies. Tao has destroyed all its enemies before the fight even began.

Such is Tao. Simple, yet impossible to understand.

Tao is like water. It doesnt crush obstacles. Water has no obstacles, thus nothing can stop it.

Water has destroyed all obstacles, because it doesnt consider anything as its obstacle. If water is stopped by a rock, it is not stopped but will go around it because the rock is not its obstacle. By simply changing path and goal, water turns obstacle into non-obstacle. Such is Tao.

Tao fights like there is no enemies because Tao has no enemies, thus no enemy can defeat it because no enemy exists because no one is the enemy.

Thus, we can destroy all enemies by not considering them enemies anymore.

We can destroy all obstacles by not considering them obstacles anymore.

Water doesnt actually have obstacles.

Its the humans who think "water would have gone the other path if it wasnt for this obstacle".

But water thinks "I have no obstacles, because I chose exactly this path which has no obstacles.".

Such is Tao. The path of least input, maximum output. The best path is the one which has no obstacles. The best path is the one which requires least effort to get to destination. The best destination is the one which has path of least effort and least obstacles.
The best path is Tao, and those who travel it have no enemies, have no obstacles, use least effort and achieve greatest result.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
We can fix everything. We can make everything and everyone better than they are. Thus, Tao is the person which seeks to make everyone good and doesnt seek to destroy or harm anyone, or seek fault in anyone. Tao benefits all and is good to all.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,580
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea

I agree, Tao is no Trump.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6
0
0
3
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Do you truly believe that a subject chooses its own enemies? Seems… ridiculous.

Now, admittedly, it’s hard to assign enemies to an aspect of nature, but I’ll try: Water’s enemy is not the rock, it is the dam. The dam restricts water, keeps it from moving at all and exerts its control over it. When water destroys the dam, it has destroyed its enemy, and may be free once again. However, if water remains still, it will never escape the dam’s clutches. Therefore, water attempts to push against its confines, and though it can succeed, due to its innate pacifism it will most often fail against one familiar with it.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@borz_kriffle
Do you truly believe that a subject chooses its own enemies?
Well, since the label "enemy" is assigned by the mind and subjectively defined, yes.

Water’s enemy is not the rock, it is the dam
Did water tell you that?
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6
0
0
3
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Ok, I’ll grant you this: I technically could say right now that no one is my enemy and (from my point of view) I would have no enemies.

But if there was a bullet heading towards my skull, that wouldn’t prevent my death.

Enemies are in the eye of the observer. You would not say that an unaware woman has no enemies simply because her boyfriend hasn’t yet revealed that he plans to kill her, would you? She doesn’t see the boyfriend as her enemy, yet he is. From her point of view, she has none, but from an objective one she certainly does.

And no, the water didn’t tell me that. Did it tell you that it has none? No. Because it doesn’t have a brain.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@borz_kriffle
So you think you can decide what water or woman considers as enemy.

Maybe woman would consider if she knew, but it seems that the label is still assigned by you and her.

Also, you seem to think that death is your enemy after claiming no one was your enemy.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6
0
0
3
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Ok, let’s make this personal: do you consider lifelong pain and suffering your enemy?
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@borz_kriffle
Not if I am someone who likes pain or just doesnt care.
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,609
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Best.Korea
Tao

I thought it was a song, BK.

Teo  come an me wan go ho um.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6
0
0
3
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Are you someone who likes pain? I think it’s hard to not care even a little, if not impossible.