Every thing you've ever done in your life is subject to world wide scrutiny and every word you speak will be played on an endless loop if you screw up so I really don't know why this narrative convinces you.
Whether a Harris flaw is something as harmless as speeding or something as serious as giving someone HIV (or same for Trump), this election demonstrated that MAGA won't change their minds on Trump (and vice versa for the dems).
Bernie Sanders was accused of having r@pe fantasies; nobody who initially liked him cared. Tim Waltz has a DUI to his name; the people that like him don't care.
Why you seem to think Joe Rogan is so much more intimidating than everyone else on planet earth. But whatever, you're entitled to your opinion.
Not intimidating; but influencial. If Obama, Jay Z, DeSantis, or Kid Rock endorses someone, it changes virtually nobody's minds. Joe Rogan endorses someone; a bunch of people change their minds. Same with RFK; if he backed Harris, then it would have helped Harris in the election; she might be at D+9 by now (initially D+5, but Trump would get angrier and more unhinged, boosting Harris'es numbers). But he backed Trump; so that made the election close.
For the same reason she along with every presidential candidate does anything they do this close to an election; because they along with their team calculated that there is a more effective use of their time.
How is Beyonce more effective than Rogan? Virtually every big Beyonce fan is voting for Harris; her fan base is black urban women. The ones that like Trump won't change their minds and are willing to listen to an artist they disagree with.
I listen to Billy Joel sometimes; he could endorse Trump or Harris; it won't change my support; but I'd still listen to his music.
Rogan is not like that at all to a lot of people.
You said you don't take any of her claims seriously, and yet the claims you are talking about are being made pretty much everywhere in the country including many times on this site.
Yes; but in terms of the evidence for and against those facts, I don't expect randos here left or right to have all the facts to defend their position. I'm sure some people are fast; but I wouldn't place them in a 100 meter Olympic dash. I would save that for the people who actually train and make that their life's work.
Harris is the one who has to actually train and make good arguments for her positions that she can tell Rogan. Same with Trump. For anyone who's a supporter of either; training (ie research) is optional; so they're less likely to do it nearly as well.
The claim that Trump is fascist is proven by playing his actual words that he has publicly uttered many times before.
Those words Harris can state on Rogan and Rogan would provide decent counters that Harris would be expected to be able to rebuttal.
Plus the fact that the people he appointed and worked side by side with him are telling us this is who he is behind the scenes as well.
Why Trump has a high turnover rate; I don't know. Harris can bring up this point in a Rogan interview. See what Rogan says; if he can't say anything and endorses Harris, then it will help Harris in the polls (which she needs at this point).
So why do you care what Kamala tells you to believe, do you not have your own opinions?
I do, but I am not going to put as much effort into them as someone who's litterally running for POTUS. Just like I may run occasionally, I'm not going to put in as much effort as the top 5 active marathoners.
But not every Harris supporter will go out and vote, neither will every Trump supporter. Undecided voters at this point in the campaign are a tiny sliver of the population, what's far more important at this stage is energizing your voters to go out and cast a ballot.
This is a good point; I just think most people are as energized enough to vote for either candidate if they support them. If you're energized on September 1 to vote Trump out; then it's likely that lasts for 2 months. In the 2020 election, there was the least amount of state by state swing out of any election since 2000, and Trump was running against someone many thought had dementia. People have largely made up their minds, and even though the undecided voters are a small part of the population, they are the annexable ones and should be treated as such.
