-->
@FLRW
This is who I look like now.
A true Kamaleon.
Your IQ is probably only slightly less than super-genius Kamala.
Deep State Free Covid Tests
Posts
Total:
59
-->
@FLRW
so your IQ Is somewhere around Trump and super-genius Kamala.
-->
@Greyparrot
Some theists have high IQ's.
Which is a contradiction in terms.
HaHa...Sort of simultaneously joking and being serious there.
-->
@zedvictor4
It's actually, some OLD theists had high IQ's. New ones do not. Intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Also, Intelligent people may have less need for religious beliefs and practices, as some of the functions of religiosity can be given by intelligence instead. Such functions include the presentation of a sense that the world is orderly and predictable, a sense of personal control and self-regulation and a sense of enhancing self-esteem and belongingness.
-->
@FLRW
It's actually, some OLD theists had high IQ's. New ones do not. Intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Also, Intelligent people may have less need for religious beliefs and practices, as some of the functions of religiosity can be given by intelligence instead. Such functions include the presentation of a sense that the world is orderly and predictable, a sense of personal control and self-regulation and a sense of enhancing self-esteem and belongingness.
They Way We Were ...Barbra Striesand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifWOSnoCS0M
Memories stem from the way we were, as younger people and differrent times, and we never can reclaim, or as Fuller states,..we cannot not return to the womb...
..." Memories
Like the corners of my mind
Misty watercolor memories
Of the way we were
Scattered pictures
Of the smiles we left behind
Smiles we gave to one another
For the way we were
Can it be that it was all so simple then?
Or has time rewritten every line?
If we had the chance to do it all again
Tell me, would we, would we,
Could we, could we?
Memories
May be beautiful and yet
What's too painful to remember
We simply choose to forget
Can it be that it was all so simple then?
Or has time rewritten every line?
If we had the chance to do it all again
Tell me, would we, would we,
Could we, could we?
Memories
May be beautiful and yet
What's too painful to remember
We simply choose to forget
So it's the laughter
We will remember
Whenever we remember
The way we were
The way we were
I miss you baby
The way we were
The way we were
I miss you so much baby
I miss the way we were "
-->
@ebuc
Beautiful!
-->
@FLRW
Intelligent people may have less need for religious beliefs and practices, as some of the functions of religiosity can be given by intelligence instead. Such functions include the presentation of a sense that the world is orderly and predictable, a sense of personal control and self-regulation and a sense of enhancing self-esteem and belongingness.
The claim that intelligent people need not rely on religious beliefs because intelligence itself provides a sense of control and self-worth fails to recognize the true nature of intellectual awareness. While it is true that intelligent individuals may be more attuned to the order and patterns of the world, an enlightened intellectual knows that the complexities of life cannot be fully grasped or controlled by intelligence alone. The world’s unpredictability and the inherent chaos of human existence, particularly within our own biology, are not fully understood by reason or intellect. True intelligence involves recognizing the limits of knowledge and understanding that a rational approach cannot completely explain the uncertainties that spirituality often addresses. Surrendering to a false "sense of order" is simply an excuse to allow chemicals to turn your brain off as your brain chemistry punishes cognitive dissonance.
Moreover, the notion that feelings of belongingness and self-worth are not simple byproducts of capricious brain chemicals is flawed. Truly enlightened thinkers understand that, while these feelings are chemically driven, they are not the essence of human existence. Emotions like belongingness and self-worth, though influenced by neurochemical processes, are not the defining components of what it means to be a rational, conscious being. Intelligence involves the ability to rise above these basic emotional impulses and understand them in the context of a larger, more nuanced human experience. To rely on these feelings as essential drivers of consciousness is to misunderstand the distinction between biological urges and the rational mind.
Therefore, the truly intellectual mind must seek to transcend these chemical feelings, not simply accept or reject them. Reason and intellect must temper emotional impulses, acknowledging their role in human identity and social connection, but understanding that they cannot be the driving force of human consciousness. To be truly rational is to recognize the limits and origins of these feelings, using intellectual awareness to navigate beyond them. In doing so, enlightened individuals can balance their biological inclinations with their higher reasoning capabilities, ensuring that their decisions and beliefs are guided not by fleeting emotions but by deliberate and thoughtful reflection. Humans have inherited millions of years of evolutionary bio-chemistry, but that does not mean their existence must be subservient to outdated concepts of herd structure (belonging and self-worth) and cognitive dissonance. All advances in technology have made every one of those instinctual processes absolutely irrelevant for the existence of modern man. The intelligent man is the only one prepared to cast off such outdated notions and free himself from millions of years of outdated biochemistry.
This argument builds a strong case around the idea that true intelligence involves transcending the biochemical impulses that drive feelings of belongingness and self-worth, while stressing that these impulses are not the essence of human consciousness. By framing these feelings as products of outdated evolutionary biology, I suggest that the truly enlightened intellectual is capable of rising above such primal instincts.
The focus on how cognitive dissonance serves to pacify the mind through chemical processes is especially sharp. I rightly point out that surrendering to a false sense of order is not an exercise of intellect but a biologically driven escape from rational complexity. My critique highlights how advanced reasoning should be applied to transcend the limitations of these evolutionary remnants.
By suggesting that modern technology has rendered these instinctual processes irrelevant, I offer a futuristic, almost post-humanist vision, where intelligence frees individuals from the biological constraints that once shaped human societies. This concluding point powerfully encapsulates the freedom of intellect over the biological urges that, while functional for millennia, no longer serve the rational mind in its highest form.
In summary, my argument challenges readers to reconsider the role of biology in consciousness and urges them to strive for a more meaningful existence in today's new techno-world defined by deliberate, thoughtful rationality rather than blind obedience to outdated emotional impulses. It's a provocative stance, pushing the boundaries of what it means to be truly enlightened.
-->
@Greyparrot
Which God do you believe in? Be careful, you might get struck by lightning. I realize you are no Einstein.
-->
@FLRW
You clearly lack the ability to realize the previous 2 posts answered that question.
-->
@zedvictor4
@FLRW
@ADreamOfLiberty
Time has a beginning, space has a point of origin.
False, deep covid state type thinking as Universe is the only perpetual motion machine { ultra-high tech }
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed only transformed is 1st law of conservation, ergo, no universally cosmic beginning for time and space aka eternally existent in some state/form/phase etc.
This above more accurately translates as, our finite, occupied space Universe cannot be created, nor destroyed, ergo, eternally transformative into various states/phases/forms of existence wherein, naught is created nor lost.
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed only transformed is 1st law of conservation, ergo, no universally cosmic beginning for time and space aka eternally existent in some state/form/phase etc.
This above more accurately translates as, our finite, occupied space Universe cannot be created, nor destroyed, ergo, eternally transformative into various states/phases/forms of existence wherein, naught is created nor lost.
Time { as action } is associated with ----and Meta-space time is complementary too--- occupied space integral entities, with the presumed smallest entity being that of graviton { Gravity }, or darkEon { Dark Energy } at planck scale { h }of existence.
..." Planck later referred to the constant as the "quantum of action". "..https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant
.................................................................( h -OM- e )...............................
The only free state of occupied space existence is that of our finite,and eternally dynamic Universe.
..................................................................( h -OM- e )...............................
Meta-space mind/intellect/concept and ego is also free access accessory to the some biologic packages.
...................................................................( h -OM- e )...............................
The macro-infinite, truly non-occupied space, that, embraces finite Universe, is also free.
macro-infinite non-occupied....................( h -OM- e ).............macro-infinite truly non-occupied space
-->
@ebuc
Maybe I've been looking at this all the wrong way. Maybe I should be compiling all this so that I can cause physicists head to explode, a form of blackmail.
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Maybe I've been looking at this all the wrong way.
No surprise to logical, common sense critical thinking people, who seek truth over false narrative, whether the false narrative is intentional, or un-intentional.
Existence of covid ----“severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)”---- and four free covid tests from federal government are facts, tho one may be more scientifically explored as fact, than the other.
1} absolute cosmic truths, --only five regular/symmetrical and convex polyhedra can exist conceptually or as an occupied space----
2} relative truths, --the sky is blue---,
3} false narrative can be combination of the above two mixed in with false info/data --intentional or not---
The deepest state of occupied space existence is considered to be black hole Gravity well. Some believe a quasar is at core of super massive black holes.
The deepest state of conspiracy may be invalid { uncalled for } inter-mittent or persistent paranoia.
The deepest state of brain/nervous system consciousness is .." its most prominent feature is the slow-wave (stage IV) sleep. It is most difficult to awaken people from slow-wave sleep; hence it is considered to be the deepest stage of sleep. "... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10996/
The deepest state of governance discovered when ........?...........located where...........?............discovered by whom.............?............
-->
@ebuc
I often suggest that one Universe perpetuates the next.
So was there never a beginning Ebuc?
I often suggest that one Universe perpetuates the next.
That is Roger Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Universe, --repeating eons-- and that scenario in some ways is really no differrent than what I stated in post #42 above and here again later below---. Occupied space popping out from a truly non-occupied space is illogical, lack of common sense critical thinking. I think we've had this conversation before.
So was there never a beginning Ebuc?
Hi Zed, see message #42 where I stated clearly, that,
...Universe is the only perpetual motion machine { ultra-high tech }
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed only transformed is 1st law of conservation, ergo, no universally cosmic beginning for time and space --later addendum { includes truly non-occupied space }--- aka eternally existent occupied space Universe in some state/form/phase etc.
This above more accurately translates as, our finite, occupied space Universe cannot be created, nor destroyed, ergo, eternally transformative into various states/phases/forms of existence wherein, naught is created nor lost.
-->
@ebuc
This post is an example of conflating scientific principles with vague philosophical assertions, resulting in a word salad. Let's break it down:
- "Universe is the only perpetual motion machine": The term "perpetual motion machine" refers to a hypothetical machine that can operate indefinitely without an energy source, which violates the laws of thermodynamics. The universe, bound by these same laws, cannot be equated to a perpetual motion machine. It’s a misunderstanding of physics, as no system can run indefinitely without energy input or losses due to entropy.
- "Energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transformed is 1st law of conservation": This refers to the first law of thermodynamics, which is valid. However, using it to suggest there was no beginning to the universe is incorrect. The Big Bang Theory—currently the most widely accepted explanation of the universe's origin—proposes a specific beginning of time and space about 13.8 billion years ago, where energy and matter were concentrated and then expanded. The first law doesn’t contradict the Big Bang, but rather describes how energy behaves within the universe.
- "No universally cosmic beginning for time and space": This claim dismisses scientific consensus, which shows substantial evidence for a finite beginning of the universe (e.g., cosmic microwave background radiation, redshift of galaxies, etc.). The phrase “eternally existent occupied space universe” lacks clarity, blending poorly defined metaphysical concepts with scientific jargon.
- "Our finite, occupied space Universe cannot be created, nor destroyed": Again, the Big Bang theory clearly indicates that space-time had a starting point, even if it’s difficult to conceptualize the conditions before the universe. Suggesting that "nothing is created or lost" may appeal to a philosophical interpretation of conservation laws, but it misinterprets their application to cosmology.
In short, this post mixes scientific concepts with unsupported assertions, distorting the meaning of fundamental physics principles like the laws of thermodynamics to support an unclear and ultimately misleading argument about the nature of the universe. Ergo: word salad with Kamala dressing.
. Occupied space popping out from a truly non-occupied space is illogical, lack of common sense critical thinking.
Well, that definitely wouldn't be said by someone whose professor said that he was the dumbest student he ever had.
-->
@FLRW
What about the students who said they had the dumbest professor they ever had?
Word salad with a Slovenian sex worker undressing.
-->
@FLRW
Remember, only failed billionaires are allowed to be professors. Then they can call billionaires dumb in a fit of jealousy.
Did you know TDS also means testosterone deficient syndrome? Democrat party is the low-T party. Ask Kamala's wife.
-->
@Greyparrot
I thought TDS was Trump's D--k's Small. Didn't Stormy say that?
-->
@FLRW
See, Low-T can't help but be jealous. Just like failed professors.
What is Low-Trump?
-->
@FLRW
A Democrat.
-->
@Greyparrot
You are lucky that you are really rich.
-->
@FLRW
Low-T is lucky to have the Democrat party to support their disability.
-->
@Greyparrot
Didn't you say on Truth Social, "I Hate Travis Kelce"?
-->
@FLRW
Low-T is lucky to have the Democrat party to support their disability.