Bill O'Reilly was a host on Fox News, hence I am the reporter.
I’m sus on that justification.
Since Fox News isn’t news (like seriously, they outright argued in court that no one would mistake them for news), calling someone a reporter merely for having worked there is somewhat out of place. Given that Bill O’Reilly incited terrorism in the very manner Wyilted recently launched a MEEP on, it seems if the role is defined by the person instead of the rant, that he’d have something related to that.
The major redeeming feature is that no one else has claimed an investigative role (but even there, yours is of very low utility for being outed before we have visiting or not claims from people). Why have you not pushed for that one piece of information from everyone?
…
Everyone else, is your role justified more so by the person or by the rant they made?