I believe in free speech, Trump does not

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 47
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
This is misdirection, that is not the context.
I am completely unaware of the Trump clip Fox News took down.

You can say you sell shoes, but if they're actually pine cones you're lying. Just like you can say you're a journalist, but if you censor matters of utmost public interest because you don't want your viewers/readers to know about them then you're lying.
The only time they wouldn’t cover a story is if it’s not profitable enough.  Big News stations are motivated by capitalism, and they will do whatever they believe is most profitable to advertisers.  It’s not out of hatred for conservatives, it’s out of a desire to make money.

Oh, you're trolling again. I suppose not knowing when you are trolling is part of the troll.
Nope.  I’ve seen many left wing and right wing videos get removed.  It turns out that multi trillion dollar companies are hard to manage in terms of data.

If they wanted to censor conservatives, then Ben Shapiro would have never became famous.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
But you seem to be dodging the question:

Do you agree with Trump on this?
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,803
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Either what I said was true or false .
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
If they wanted to censor conservatives, then Ben Shapiro would have never became famous.

Alex Jones is probably more famous for being censored.
Same with Tucker.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,164
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
But you seem to be dodging the question:
Have you considered the possibility that I did answer and it's a technical glitch that you can't see it?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I guess UD doesn't believe n the Streisand effect...
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
@GP

Alex Jones is probably more famous for being censored.
Same with Tucker.
Tucker was famous in 2000.  I'm referring to if Big Tech wanted to censor conservatives, then lets say generic conservative commentator A starts their channel Jan 1 2010.  Their channel would have been taken down by Jan 8, 2010 before they got big and famous.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Have you considered the possibility that I did answer and it's a technical glitch that you can't see it?
Possible, but if that's the case, then repost.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
Shapiro is becoming markedly less famous for censoring Candace Owens.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
@GP

Shapiro is becoming markedly less famous for censoring Candace Owens.
He did this because of capitalism.

But the Daily wire has been around since Aug 20, 2015.  Why wasn't their account banned in Aug 27?  It's because Big Tech isn't censoring conservatives due to capitalism.

Big Tech will do what is needed to make the most money.  If that means free speech, then fine.  If it means censorship, then fine.

Either you respect that or you don't believe in capitalism on this issue.  You would want ultimate equality of viewpoint freedom (socialism = equality).  Not all views are equal; some bring more profit than others.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You dodged again.

If Trump wants to censor leftist speech due to his belief that it's unpatriotic and unamerican, then do you agree with him doing that?  If you refuse to answer, then I (and I hope everyone else who readds this) will assume the answer is yes.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
He did this because of capitalism.
Pressing X to doubt.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
@GP

You will defend whoever MAGA world loves no matter what, so it’s not surprising that you would say this.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,164
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
You assume whatever you want, I forgot it was pointless to talk to you since you ignore fact checks.
Owen_T
Owen_T's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 590
3
2
9
Owen_T's avatar
Owen_T
3
2
9
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I find it really amusing you still didn't actually give an answer.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,164
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Owen_T
Maybe you should ask a question if you want an answer, unless you're a sock puppet of underdog; then don't bother.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You assume whatever you want, I forgot it was pointless to talk to you since you ignore fact checks.
2nd statement is incorrect.  The conservatives are the ones that claim the fac checks are leftist propaganda, not the independents.