Necrobumping is superior to just create the same thread over and over again (such as "god exists heres proof" and "trump bad" and "lgbtq+ should be accepted"), change my mind.
Being Pro choice is being pro abortion/homosexuality.
Posts
Total:
70
-->
@Double_R
You're basically saying I can support the choice resulting in abortion even though I'm against abortion.
This is a contradiction.
You're asking me to explain how a dilemma you cherry picked is not a dilemma.
I'm not arguing what you're cherry picking.
Your hand picked circumstance is not every circumstance. So in a case where there's no dilemma and there's more than enough justification to actually bring a pregnancy to term, no issues whatsoever, if you truly stand for no abortion, you would not want anything to contradict that or else you be lying.
Even if you're in a dilemma, it may be a way of proving where you truly stand or have you been disingenuous.
Do you support the choice of a continuous murderous person?
-->
@Mall
You're basically saying I can support the choice resulting in abortion even though I'm against abortion.This is a contradiction.
No, it’s not. You can disagree with someone’s decision while believing they should have the right to make that decision.
This has been explained repeatedly to you throughout this thread. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
You're asking me to explain how a dilemma you cherry picked is not a dilemma.
Cherry picking? WTF? It’s literally the topic of this thread.
So in a case where there's no dilemma and there's more than enough justification to actually bring a pregnancy to term…
If everyone agreed that there was justification to bring the pregnancy to term we would not be having this conversation. This debate exists specifically because there are instances where, for whatever reason, the woman who is pregnant does not wish to carry the pregnancy to term, so she has already decided that there isn’t justification. The only question at hand here is whether she gets to decide that or not. This debate has exactly zero to do with whether you or anyone else wants her to have the baby.
So let’s try this again:
A women is pregnant with an unwanted child. You can either:
A) Allow her to terminate the pregnancy thereby killing the unborn child
Or
B) Force the woman to carry the pregnancy to term against her will.
Explain how this is not both a dilemma and a true dichotomy.
Do you support the choice of a continuous murderous person?
Even though you have ignored my question, I will still be courteous enough to you as to not pretend you didn’t ask it.
I do not support the right of anyone to decide whether to murder another person.
-->
@Double_R
Ok so let's open up the basis and reasoning here .
Why would I believe in people having the right to decide to do whatever they want to do if I disagree with them on a serious subject and result?
We're not talking about me disagreeing with you choosing ketchup over mustard.
Let's us be clear , consistent and specific to the center of this topic.
When you have a contradiction such as what you're suggesting, of course nobody is going to understand.
Think about it. Do you support the choice of a continuous murderous person?
Why or why not? Do you support the choice of children using all kinds of drugs ongoing?
Do you support the choice of a pedophile that consistently engages in pedophilia?
If you say yes, to what end would be the point?
I'm sure the majority would say no. If you say no, the point of that end would be the same over the abortion issue which you tout there's no support in and of itself but to the same end, so there's no need to give strength to a decision of an act you're actually opposed to .
Quit the half stepping and compromising.
"Cherry picking? WTF? It’s literally the topic of this thread."
No it absolutely is not. Quote me where I specified the dilemma you broached.
"If everyone agreed that there was justification to bring the pregnancy to term we would not be having this conversation. This debate exists specifically because there are instances where, for whatever reason, the woman who is pregnant does not wish to carry the pregnancy to term, so she has already decided that there isn’t justification. The only question at hand here is whether she gets to decide that or not. This debate has exactly zero to do with whether you or anyone else wants her to have the baby."
Look the point I'm discussing in relation to abortion is that pro choice is pro abortion. These two are one in the same. That's all I'm discussing.
You can keep trying it again all you're going to, not we .
I say again:
You're asking me to explain how a dilemma you cherry picked is not a dilemma.
I'm not arguing what you're cherry picking.
The point of this topic is pro choice is pro abortion.
Now you can argue that you can support a choice without supporting the result attached to it or yield and concede that you can't.
You have said you believe homosexuality is a choice, if you are pro "gay choice" then you must be gay, right?
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
-->
@Mall
The point of this topic is pro choice is pro abortion.
Your intentionally misplaced/twisted concept is the topic.
"Being Pro choice is being pro abortion/homosexuality."
I'm not astute enough to know the correct terminology definning your repeated thread topics actions.
Malicious? Mischievous? Trolling? Click baiting? Uncompassionate? Inconsiderate? Etc
-->
@ebuc
The point of this topic is pro choice is pro abortion.Your intentionally misplaced/twisted concept is the topic."Being Pro choice is being pro abortion/homosexuality."I'm not astute enough to know the correct terminology definning your repeated thread topics actions.Malicious? Mischievous? Trolling? Click baiting? Uncompassionate? Inconsiderate? Etc
Could be as simple as dumb as a bag of hammers.
-->
@ebuc
Pro choice is pro abortion/homosexuality altogether.
-->
@Mall
As I've stated repeatedly.
Pro-choice is not necessarily pro-abortion.
And homosexuality is two blokes getting it on.
-->
@zedvictor4
I'll accept that. It is not necessarily but is.