Speaking of which, I noticed a pattern. It looks like role justifications for the most part are based on the powers the hero has. With GP’s claim, my role and character, and Pies role and character, I think we can assume that the role justification are based on the abilities. Is this true for everyone?Without char claiming or doing that, can you see if this is true with your characters?
Kinda weird claim by Pie. I don't really buy it, but I suppose it's semi-confirmable later on.
Whiteflame unvoted to prevent quickhammer
Is there any reason not to reveal my role right now? The only special thing about it is that it can be easily confirmed.
What is weird about it, and why do you not buy it? What do you want to do now? Answering my questions would be a start
What do you want to do now?
If you don’t get on in the next hour I’m voting you as well.
I think Barney has been lurky enough that I'm fine getting a claim from him, I guess.
You should post your opinions on this, so we can move forward with dp.
I remain fine with pushing Barney, though to avoid any possibility of someone hammering, Unvote.Consider my vote on you regardless.
Pie is generally anti-town, but shit and being scum are not the same thing. Hence I’m no OMGYSing him.
I find it weird that the literal namesake of the series doesn't even get assigned an active role (Commuter is basically a combination of two passive roles, Bulletproof and Ascetic). It's also an easy claim to explain why you're not getting NKed, as well as explaining any failed investigations and whatnot. This was the exact reason why I fakeclaimed Ascetic in the last game.
