I'm voting for Biden and I don't think MAGA arguments against him are good

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 36
#31
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,167
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
You spread lies, it's not good to follow your example.
I don't lie about politics; everything I say I believe is true.
Then you are mentally disabled because I showed you a lie you spread in exacting detail and you did not care nor retract.

My fact check is that you are:
This 1/3 doesn't care about facts

Topic's author
#32
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Then you are mentally disabled because I showed you a lie you spread in exacting detail and you did not care nor retract.
Or I got too lazy to check it all and if the argument is, "This bill just legalized self defense", then that to me doesn't make sense because Arizona already had self defense as legal.

My fact check is that you are:
I don't trust your fact check (which is really biased).  I trust the experts (so not you).  I trust people with PhDs from Ivy League Schools; the smart people (and they claim a zygote is a human being due to science and I agree with them, so it's not even entirely leftist).  They care about facts.  Facts don't care about your feelings.  Anytime they are wrong, they change their stance.

College over chrisima.
#33
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,167
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
I don't trust your fact check (which is really biased).
Oh no.


I trust the experts (so not you).  I trust people with PhDs from Ivy League Schools; the smart people
You mean Kyle Kulinski.


and they claim a zygote is a human being due to science and I agree with them, so it's not even entirely leftist
Do they now? "Follow the science"

rofl


They care about facts.
So you don't have to (TM)


Anytime they are wrong, they change their stance.
Consider emulating "them", then you might be worthy of being emulated yourself.
Topic's author
#34
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You mean Kyle Kulinski.
I mean Pew Research.

Do they now? "Follow the science"
The science says a zygote is a human being, so it's what I believe.  I'm not as left wing as you think I am.

They care about facts.
So you don't have to (TM)
Incorrect.  You cited a far right poll and I cited Pew Research.

Anytime they are wrong, they change their stance.
Consider emulating "them", then you might be worthy of being emulated yourself.
If there is a good argument for it, then I will do that.  But I'm waiting.  And you said earlier your goal was not to change my mind, so you contradicted yourself in this thread.
#35
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,167
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
I'm not as left wing as you think I am.
I said you don't care about facts. I'll say further that you don't understand science or rational epistemology.

Political dogma is an optional symptom, not a root cause.


They care about facts.
So you don't have to (TM)
Incorrect.  You cited a far right poll and I cited Pew Research.
Where did I cite a "far right poll"?

I'm pretty sure I linked to the law published by the state.
Topic's author
#36
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Where did I cite a "far right poll"?
I confused you for some guy that cited this poll:


They are a biased source.