Low quality threads are a serious issue

Until RM points it out, 2faced clown.

FYI, your own threads are trash.

If I have to be everybody's daddy here I will. I give you guys until Wednesday to get your shit together

Enough users did vote you to be their president which I guess equates to daddy of the site.

Let's compare those that voted me Vs voted you and the quality of their threads, go ahead and do so.

Best Korea is a Wylted voter.

Mall voted neither.

Guys, I promise you that my threads aint gonna get any better.

I dont regret voting for Wylted even tho it was objectively a mistake.

wylted is our daddy. dont make him turn this car around and force us to go home. 

What do you have that is "high " or "better" quality?

If you can provide none, well retract this .

This individual is communicating that the threads are lacking substance and yet offer no compensatory quality. 

This individual is communicating that the threads are lacking substance and yet offer no compensatory quality. 

Just because you have no interest in a thread or can't get anything out of it, so be it.

I see many threads that lack substance including the ones  that get labeled as hot topics. But it's called freedom of speech and expression. I don't get anything out of it, so be it .

You're entitled to say what you say, ask the questions you ask.

How do you not get an increase of substance out of a topic thread when questions are being asked in that thread?

The questions are there to spark mindful, insightful substance and responses. It's not someone "blowing hot air" just because. It's not quote on quote to hear yourself talk. You spark intellectual conversation particularly posing questions to the public.

You see a topic you're not interested in , pass by , keep it moving like I do . One example is with this Trump centralization. There are greater things to discuss but I guess he is the greatest to interact over. But I don't make a topic thread over it .

Not everything will always be controversial or inflammatory.

The average human's intellect makes it so that there can only be so many high quality debates and forum posts. Keep in mind that as dumb as many people are here, the people here are actually mostly above average compared to normies who wouldn't even have the attention span to read a single paragraph unless forced to and who find anything even remotely intellectual totally outside their scope of interest.

I am a very rare person in the sense that I am retarded but actually like thinking about intellectual stuff. Average humans will just make fun of you or ignore you if you talk about anything other than fortnite or tiktok.

The phrase is quote-unquote, not quote on quote.

It never feels good to vote for the lesser of 2 evils

The bar for your posts aren't really that high in the first place

Click this link and read a high quality debate comment from our favourite site president.

Shining star of quality content.

The lengths some people will go through to support pedophilia is amazing

Yes, I just come on this site to take a shit and let others talk about it.

The lengths some will go to act high and mighty while really being a toxic mess of a person is shocking too.

Wasn't it just 3-4 days ago I was called a bully for saying what your OP here says on even more objectively low quality threads than you're whining about here?

Well, its not like he's gonna stop trolling just because he became president. Being president is his secondary role on this site.

sure but I genuinely don't think he realises even his own voters see him as a pathetic troll, he unironically thinks people deeply respect him and value his contributions.

I'm being harsh on him because he's an arrogant harsh prick on others and needs to properly comprehend that essentially 0 members here, even those that enjoy him, see him as anything close to a high quality example of a member here.

Its just supporting free speech, which you said that you support.

People didnt vote for Wylted thinking he will improve the site. They voted for him because it seemed funny to do so or because they were friends or belonged to same side of the politics.

No one really votes to improve the site, except few exceptions.

Whatever.

I only told you because I myself have sometimes known a phrase or 2 wrong for a long time and was so happy the first time I realised I'd been wrong, to not do it again.

This individual still hasn't offered anything. 

You don't like that Best Korea and Mall are competing with you for most low-quality threads?

No I believe it was just a typo. I've heard the phrase before but I'm not as concerned with grammer as in getting my bottom line across.

Just like someone use the word organise instead of organize. I didn't harp on that because I was looking at getting the point.